SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive In-wall Speakers
  3. KEF Ci200QL vs KEF CI3160RLM THX

KEF Ci200QL vs KEF CI3160RLM THX Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

KEF Ci200QL

Passive In-wall | 35-34k Hz

KEF Ci200QL
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
KEF CI3160RLM THX

Passive In-wall | 43-28k Hz

KEF CI3160RLM THX
Check price atAmazon›
KEF Ci200QL KEF Ci200QL
Check price atAmazon›
KEF CI3160RLM THX KEF CI3160RLM THX
Check price atAmazon›
KEF Ci200QL
See at AMAZON
KEF CI3160RLM THX
See at AMAZON

KEF Ci200QL vs KEF CI3160RLM THX Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Ci200QL and CI3160RLM THX, two Passive In-wall speakers by KEF.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF Ci200QL and KEF CI3160RLM THX first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsKEF Ci200QLKEF CI3160RLM THX
BrandKEF
United Kingdom · founded 1961
KEF
United Kingdom · founded 1961
Design2-way2-way
Uni-Q driver—12th Generation Uni-Q
Tweeter1"1"
Woofer8"2 x 6.5"
Frequency response35-34k Hz43-28k Hz
Sensitivity90 dB89 dB
Impedance8 ohms4 ohms
Weight2.63kg / 5.8lbs11.97kg / 26.3lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)14-9/16" x 10-3/4" x 4-5/16"
369.9 x 273.1 x 109.5mm
26-13/16" x 9-1/16" x 3-7/8"
681.0 x 230.2 x 99.0mm

Ci200QL and CI3160RLM THX are members of KEF's Ci series of speakers. Below you can find the loudspeakers from this series.

KEF Ci Series History
Model Body Frequency SensitivityImpedance Woofer
KEF CI3160RLM THX
In-wall 43-28k Hz 89 dB4Ω 2 x 6.5"
KEF Ci200QL
In-wall 35-34k Hz 90 dB8Ω 1 x 8"

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both Ci200QL and CI3160RLM THX are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 8 inch
KEF Ci200QL
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
KEF CI3160RLM THX

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver KEF Ci200QL KEF CI3160RLM THX
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 1 x 8-inch 2 x 6.5-inch

Ci200QL features a 1" Tweeter and 1 x 8" Woofer. On the other hand, the CI3160RLM THX features a 1" Tweeter and 2 x 6.5" Woofer.

Frequency Response

Ci200QL has a frequency range of 35-34k Hz whereas CI3160RLM THX has a frequency range of 43-28k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 35Hz, the Ci200QL can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the CI3160RLM THX's min frequency of 43Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the In-wall class in our database.

Low Frequency

In-wall Speakers

Ci200QL
CI3160RLM THX
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Ci200QL is a 8 ohms speaker compared to the CI3160RLM THX which has a nominal impedance of 4 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the CI3160RLM THX can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. Ci200QL sensitivity is rated at 90 dB and the CI3160RLM THX's is rated at 89 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the KEF Ci200QL a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF CI3160RLM THX, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

In-wall Speakers

Ci200QL
CI3160RLM THX
Min
Average
Median

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

KEF Ci200QL
 
KEF CI3160RLM THX
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Ci200QL features Spring post type posts and CI3160RLM THX has a Spring post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare KEF Ci200QL's and KEF CI3160RLM THX's external dimensions. KEF Ci200QL has external dimensions of 369.9 x 273.1 x 109.5mm () whereas KEF CI3160RLM THX has external dimensions of 681.0 x 230.2 x 99.0mm ().

KEF CI3160RLM THX is 42.9mm narrower and 10.5mm less deeper than KEF Ci200QL but it is also 311.1mm taller.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTKEF Ci200QL front: 273 x 370 mm (10.8 x 14.6 in)KEF CI3160RLM THX front: 230 x 681 mm (9.1 x 26.8 in)KEF Ci200QL273 × 370 mmKEF CI3160RLM THX230 × 681 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTKEF Ci200QL footprint: 273 x 110 mm (10.8 x 4.3 in)KEF CI3160RLM THX footprint: 230 x 99 mm (9.1 x 3.9 in)KEF Ci200QL273 × 110 mmKEF CI3160RLM THX230 × 99 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

KEF Ci200QL needs about 31% more floor or shelf area. KEF CI3160RLM THX is 311mm taller.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The KEF Ci200QL weighs 2.63kg / 5.8lbs and the KEF CI3160RLM THX weighs 11.97kg / 26.3lbs. This makes the CI3160RLM THX 355% heavier than the Ci200QL.

Here is a comparison of how Ci200QL and CI3160RLM THX's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive In-wall class.

Weight
All In-wall Speakers
KEF Ci200QL
KEF CI3160RLM THX
Min
Average
Max

Reasons to choose KEF Ci200QL over KEF CI3160RLM THX

Sensitivity 90 dB vs 89 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Woofer Size 8 inches vs 6.5 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 35 Hz vs 43 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 34k Hz vs 28k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 369mm vs 681mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Price per pair* 1200USD vs 4600USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Reasons to choose KEF CI3160RLM THX over KEF Ci200QL

Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Base Surface Area 227cm2 vs 299cm2 Takes less floor space

KEF Ci200QL vs KEF CI3160RLM THX Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General KEF Ci200QL KEF CI3160RLM THX
Brand KEF KEF
Speaker Type Passive In-wall Speaker Passive In-wall Speaker
Sensitivity 90 dB 89 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 4 ohms
Frequency Response 35-34k Hz 43-28k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 2
Woofer Size 8" 6.5"
Woofer Composition
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No 6.5"
Physical Specs
Height 369.9mm (14.6") 681.0mm (26.8")
Width 273.1mm (10.8") 230.2mm (9.1")
Depth 109.5mm (4.3") 99.0mm (3.9")
Weight 2.63kg (5.8lbs) 11.97kg (26.3lbs)
Enclosure
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Other
Parts Warranty 6 Years w/ registration 6 Years w/ registration
Labor Warranty 6 Years w/ registration 6 Years w/ registration

Verdict

Siblings in KEF's Ci series, so they share a family sound. It comes down to size, output and price.

AreaBetterWhy
BassAKEF Ci200QL digs deeper - 35Hz against 43Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (90dB vs 89dB) - both want much the same power.
Amplifier matchAKEF Ci200QL is the easier load at 8 ohms; the other is 4 ohms and wants an amplifier rated for it.
SizedependsKEF Ci200QL is easier to place; KEF CI3160RLM THX is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
PriceAKEF Ci200QL is cheaper - $1,200 against $4,600, about 74% less; arguably a different class.

A KEF Ci200QL  B KEF CI3160RLM THX
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

KEF Ci200QL is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take KEF CI3160RLM THX if its size, looks or fit in your room suit you better. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 43Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. In a large or open-plan room, KEF CI3160RLM THX has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, KEF Ci200QL is the easier speaker to get right.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction