SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SOUNDBARS
    • Soundbars
      Soundbars Home All Soundbars (filter + sort) Size Simulator
      By TV Size
      43-50 inch TVs 55 inch TVs 65 inch and larger
      By Feature
      Dolby Atmos height channels Subwoofer included Can add rear speakers Compact (30 in or narrower) Under $500
      By Brand
      Bluesound Bose Denon Devialet Dual Furrion Harman Kardon JBL KEF Klipsch Marshall Polk Audio Samsung Sennheiser Sonos Sony WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. JBL Studio 680 vs PSB Imagine X2T

JBL Studio 680 vs PSB Imagine X2T Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

JBL Studio 680

Passive Floor-standing | 38-40k Hz

JBL Studio 680
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
PSB Imagine X2T

Passive Floor-standing | 30-23k Hz

PSB Imagine X2T
Check price atAmazon›
JBL Studio 680 JBL Studio 680
Check price atAmazon›
PSB Imagine X2T PSB Imagine X2T
Check price atAmazon›
JBL Studio 680
See at AMAZON
PSB Imagine X2T
See at AMAZON

JBL Studio 680 vs PSB Imagine X2T Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Studio 680 and Imagine X2T, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from JBL and PSB.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of JBL Studio 680 and PSB Imagine X2T first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsJBL Studio 680PSB Imagine X2T
BrandJBL
United States · founded 1946
PSB
Canada · founded 1972
Design2-way3-way
Tweeter1" compression driver with HDI (High Definition Imaging) waveguide1" Dome
Midrange—5.25"
Woofer2 x 6.5" PolyPlas2 x 6.2" Clay/Ceramic/Poly
Frequency response38-40k Hz30-23k Hz
Sensitivity88 dB90 dB
Impedance6 ohms8 ohms
Power rangeup to 200 watts20-200 watts
Weight22.68kg / 49.9lbs23.60kg / 51.9lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)40-3/4" x 8-15/16" x 12-1/16"
1036.0 x 228.0 x 307.0mm
40-1/8" x 9" x 16-3/4"
1020.0 x 229.0 x 426.0mm

What size room are the JBL Studio 680 and PSB Imagine X2T speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* JBL Studio 680 PSB Imagine X2T
Near-field Bad Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Average Good
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Average Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that Studio 680 is a 2-way design whereas the Imagine X2T is a 3-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
JBL Studio 680
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 5.25 inchWoofer - 6.2 inchWoofer - 6.2 inch
PSB Imagine X2T

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver JBL Studio 680 PSB Imagine X2T
Driver Setup 2-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - 1 x 5.25-inch
Woofer 2 x 6.5-inch 2 x 6.2-inch

Studio 680 features a 1" compression driver with HDI (High Definition Imaging) waveguide Tweeter and 2 x 6.5" PolyPlas Woofer. On the other hand, the Imagine X2T features a 1" titanium with neodymium magnets Dome Tweeter, a 5.25" Midrange and 2 x 6.2" Clay/Ceramic/Poly Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 500Hz and 2200Hz.

Frequency Response

Studio 680 has a frequency range of 38-40k Hz whereas Imagine X2T has a frequency range of 30-23k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 30Hz, the Imagine X2T can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Studio 680's min frequency of 38Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Studio 680
Imagine X2T
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Studio 680 is a 6 ohms speaker compared to the Imagine X2T which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. Studio 680 sensitivity is rated at 88 dB and the Imagine X2T's is rated at 90 dB. This 2 dB difference makes the PSB Imagine X2T a more sensitive speaker compared to JBL Studio 680, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

Studio 680
Imagine X2T
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Both handle the same maximum of 200 watts RMS, though Studio 680 is rated up to 200 watts and Imagine X2T 20-200 watts.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

JBL Studio 680
 
PSB Imagine X2T
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Both Studio 680 and Imagine X2T features dual binding post speaker terminals for bi-amping or bi-wiring.

JBL Studio 680 Terminals
JBL Studio 680's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

PSB Imagine X2T Terminals
PSB Imagine X2T's 5-Way post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Studio 680 has a rear firing port whereas Imagine X2T has a front firing ports. PSB Imagine X2T's front-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to JBL Studio 680 with its rear-firing port.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare JBL Studio 680's and PSB Imagine X2T's external dimensions. JBL Studio 680 has external dimensions of 1036.0 x 228.0 x 307.0mm (40-3/4-inch x 8-15/16-inch x 12-1/16-inch) whereas PSB Imagine X2T has external dimensions of 1020.0 x 229.0 x 426.0mm (40-1/8 x 9 x 16-3/4inch).

JBL Studio 680 is 1mm narrower and 119mm less deeper than PSB Imagine X2T but it is also 16mm taller.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTJBL Studio 680 front: 228 x 1036 mm (9 x 40.8 in)PSB Imagine X2T front: 229 x 1020 mm (9 x 40.2 in)JBL Studio 680228 × 1036 mmPSB Imagine X2T229 × 1020 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTJBL Studio 680 footprint: 228 x 307 mm (9 x 12.1 in)PSB Imagine X2T footprint: 229 x 426 mm (9 x 16.8 in)JBL Studio 680228 × 307 mmPSB Imagine X2T229 × 426 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

PSB Imagine X2T needs about 39% more floor or shelf area. PSB Imagine X2T is 119mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. JBL Studio 680 is 16mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the JBL Studio 680 is approximately 700.0cm2 / 108.5inch2 and base area of the PSB Imagine X2T is approximately 975.5cm2 / 151.2inch2. The Studio 680 requires 28% less surface area than the Imagine X2T which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The JBL Studio 680 weighs 22.68kg / 49.9lbs and the PSB Imagine X2T weighs 23.60kg / 51.9lbs. This makes the Imagine X2T 4% heavier than the Studio 680.

Here is a comparison of how Studio 680 and Imagine X2T's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
JBL Studio 680
PSB Imagine X2T
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of JBL Studio 680?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Studio 680:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • 4 Spike feet
  • 4 Washers
  • 4 Locking-collars
  • 4 Foot pads
  • 2 Jumper-straps (pre-installed)
  • Owners Manual
  • Warranty Card

What's in the Box of PSB Imagine X2T?

Here are the items that come with the Imagine X2T:
  • Floor-standing speaker
  • Grille
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • 4 Spiked Feet
  • Wrench
  • Quick Start Guide
  • Warranty Card


Reasons to choose JBL Studio 680 over PSB Imagine X2T

Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 6.2 inches Larger woofer
High Frequency Response 40k Hz vs 23k Hz Generates higher frequency
Base Surface Area 700cm2 vs 975cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 1198USD vs 1500USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Reasons to choose PSB Imagine X2T over JBL Studio 680

Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Sensitivity 90 dB vs 88 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 6 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Low Frequency Response 30 Hz vs 38 Hz Generates deeper bass
Port Position Front vs Rear Gives more flexibility placing close to walls
Height 1020mm vs 1036mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

JBL Studio 680 vs PSB Imagine X2T Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General JBL Studio 680 PSB Imagine X2T
Brand JBL PSB
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range up to 200 watts 20-200 watts
Sensitivity 88 dB 90 dB
Impedance 6 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 38-40k Hz 30-23k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 2
Woofer Size 6.5" 6.2"
Woofer Composition PolyPlas Clay/Ceramic/Poly
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type compression driver with HDI (High Definition Imaging) waveguide Dome
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No 5.25"
Crossover Frequency n/a 500Hz and 2200Hz
Firing Direction rear front
Physical Specs
Height 1036.0mm (40.8") 1020.0mm (40.2")
Width 228.0mm (9") 229.0mm (9")
Depth 307.0mm (12.1") 426.0mm (16.8")
Weight 22.68kg (49.9lbs) 23.60kg (51.9lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF/Wood-grain vinyl MDF/Wood-grain
Available Colors Wood, Dark Wood Black
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

A generation apart: JBL Studio 680 is the newer design, against a 2013 model. Newer is not automatically better, but the older one is more likely to be discounted or near run-out.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBPSB Imagine X2T digs deeper - 30Hz against 38Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsBPSB Imagine X2T is more sensitive (90dB vs 88dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier matchBPSB Imagine X2T is the easier load at 8 ohms.
Headroomevenly matchedSimilar power handling (200W vs 200W).
SizedependsJBL Studio 680 is easier to place; PSB Imagine X2T is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilitydependsJBL Studio 680: bi-amping; PSB Imagine X2T: bi-amping. JBL Studio 680 sits in a wider range (15 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceAJBL Studio 680 is cheaper - $1,198 against $1,500, about 20% less.

A JBL Studio 680  B PSB Imagine X2T
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

PSB Imagine X2T leads across most of the measured areas for a fairly modest premium, which makes it the easier pick if the budget stretches. JBL Studio 680 is the one to take if it does not. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 38Hz anyway, which makes the cheaper JBL Studio 680 much easier to justify. Match it to your room: we rate JBL Studio 680 the better fit for a very large room, and PSB Imagine X2T for a mid-size room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction