These sit in different price classes - Fyne Audio F703 costs roughly 8x what KLH Kendall does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.
| Area | Better | Why |
|---|
| Bass |
evenly matched |
Much the same reach (26Hz vs 25Hz). |
| Amplifier needs |
B |
KLH Kendall is more sensitive (96dB vs 94dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier. |
| Size |
depends |
KLH Kendall is easier to place; Fyne Audio F703 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides. |
| Expandability |
B |
KLH Kendall: bi-amping. |
| Price |
B |
KLH Kendall is cheaper - $1,500 against $11,999, about 87% less; arguably a different class. |
A Fyne Audio F703
B KLH Kendall
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, placement or how you will use them.
Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.
Which should you choose?
KLH Kendall is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take Fyne Audio F703 if its size, looks or fit in your room suit you better. In a large or open-plan room, Fyne Audio F703 has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, KLH Kendall is the easier speaker to get right. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, KLH Kendall is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.
And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.