SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Bookshelf Speakers
  3. ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 vs Klipsch RP-600M

ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 vs Klipsch RP-600M Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52

Passive Bookshelf | 46-35k Hz

ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Klipsch RP-600M

Passive Bookshelf | 45-25k Hz

Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-600M
Check price atAmazon›
ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch RP-600M Klipsch RP-600M
Check price atAmazon›
ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52
See at AMAZON
Klipsch RP-600M
See at AMAZON

ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 vs Klipsch RP-600M Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 and RP-600M, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from ELAC and Klipsch.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 and Klipsch RP-600M first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52Klipsch RP-600M
BrandELAC
Germany · founded 1926
Klipsch
United States · founded 1946
Design3-way2-way
Tweeter1" soft dome1" Tractrix Horn
Midrange4"—
Woofer5.25" Aluminum6.5" Cerametallic
Frequency response46-35k Hz45-25k Hz
Sensitivity85 dB96 dB
Impedance6 ohms8 ohms
Power range40-140 wattsup to 100 watts
Weight8.30kg / 18.3lbs7.30kg / 16.1lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)13-5/8" x 7-5/16" x 11-11/16"
347.0 x 186.0 x 297.0mm
15.7" x 7.9" x 11.8"
399.0 x 202.0 x 301.0mm

What size room are the ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 and Klipsch RP-600M speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 Klipsch RP-600M
Near-field Poor Average
Small Room Average Good
Mid-size Room Good Average
Large Room Average Poor
Very Large Room Poor Bad

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 is a 3-way design whereas the RP-600M is a 2-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 4 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Klipsch RP-600M

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 Klipsch RP-600M
Driver Setup 3-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 4-inch -
Woofer 1 x 5.25-inch 1 x 6.5-inch

Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 features a 1" soft dome Tweeter, a 4" Midrange and 1 x 5.25" Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 200hZ and 2000HZ. On the other hand, the RP-600M features a 1" Tractrix Horn Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" Cerametallic Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 1500Hz.

ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 driver frequency bandsELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52Klipsch RP-600M46-20045-1.5kWoofer200-2kMidrange2k-35k1.5k-25kTweeter20501002005001k2k5k10k20k40kHz, log scale

Frequency Response

Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 has a frequency range of 46-35k Hz whereas RP-600M has a frequency range of 45-25k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 45Hz, the RP-600M can go slightly deeper then the Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52's min frequency of 46Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Bookshelf class in our database.

Low Frequency

Bookshelf Speakers

Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52
RP-600M
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 is a 6 ohms speaker compared to the RP-600M which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 sensitivity is rated at 85 dB and the RP-600M's is rated at 96 dB. This 11 dB difference makes the Klipsch RP-600M a more sensitive speaker compared to ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Bookshelf Speakers

Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52
RP-600M
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 can handle a max power of 140 watts RMS, whereas RP-600M has a max power handling value of 100 watts RMS, 40 watts less than the Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52
 
Klipsch RP-600M
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

RP-600M features Dual binding posts/bi-wire/bi-amp posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 has a 5-way post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 Terminals
ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52's 5-way post terminals

Klipsch RP-600MDual binding posts/bi-wire/bi-amp Terminals
Klipsch RP-600M's Dual binding posts/bi-wire/bi-amp terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 has a front firing port whereas RP-600M has a rear firing ports. ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52's front-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to Klipsch RP-600M with its rear-firing port.

Klipsch RP-600M  Port
Klipsch RP-600M Tractrix horn-shaped Port

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52's and Klipsch RP-600M's external dimensions. ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 has external dimensions of 347.0 x 186.0 x 297.0mm (13-5/8 x 7-5/16 x 11-11/16inch) whereas Klipsch RP-600M has external dimensions of 399.0 x 202.0 x 301.0mm (15.7 x 7.9 x 11.8inch).

Klipsch RP-600M is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 16mm wider, 52mm taller and 4mm deeper than ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 and Klipsch RP-600M in scale.

ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 vs Klipsch RP-600M Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 and Klipsch RP-600M Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 is approximately 552.4cm2 / 85.6inch2 and base area of the Klipsch RP-600M is approximately 608.0cm2 / 94.2inch2. The Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 requires 9% less surface area than the RP-600M which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Here is another comparison that shows both speakers on a BDI Octave Media Cabinet, next to a standard size amplifier and turntable in scale:

ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 vs Klipsch RP-600M Size Comparison on a Media Console
Size Comparison image of ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 and Klipsch RP-600M on a Media Console
Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 weighs 8.30kg / 18.3lbs and the Klipsch RP-600M weighs 7.30kg / 16.1lbs. This makes the Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 14% heavier than the RP-600M.

Here is a comparison of how Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 and RP-600M's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Bookshelf class.

Weight
All Bookshelf Speakers
ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52
Klipsch RP-600M
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles
  • Operating Instructions

What's in the Box of Klipsch RP-600M?

Here are the items that come with the RP-600M:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles (installed)
  • 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • 4 Terminal jumpers (installed)
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 over Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-600M

Max Input Power 140 watts vs 100 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
High Frequency Response 35k Hz vs 25k Hz Generates higher frequency
Port Position Front vs Rear Gives more flexibility placing close to walls
Height 347mm vs 399mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 552cm2 vs 608cm2 Takes less floor space

Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-600M over ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52

Sensitivity 96 dB vs 85 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 6 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5.25 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 45 Hz vs 46 Hz Generates deeper bass
Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections
Price per pair* 459USD vs 700USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 vs Klipsch RP-600M Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-600M
Brand ELAC Klipsch
Speaker Type Bookshelf speakers Bookshelf speakers
Power Range 40-140 watts up to 100 watts
Sensitivity 85 dB 96 dB
Impedance 6 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 46-35k Hz 45-25k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 5.25" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Aluminum Cerametallic
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type soft dome Tractrix Horn
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 4" No
Crossover Frequency 200hZ and 2000HZ 1500Hz
Firing Direction front rear
Physical Specs
Height 347.0mm (13.7") 399.0mm (15.7")
Width 186.0mm (7.3") 202.0mm (8")
Depth 297.0mm (11.7") 301.0mm (11.9")
Weight 8.30kg (18.3lbs) 7.30kg (16.1lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF/Wood-grain vinyl MDF/Wood-grain vinyl
Available Colors Black Ebony, Walnut, Piano Black
Mounting Bracket No No
Recommended Stand Height 24-28" 22-26"
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 3 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 3 Years 5 Years

Verdict

No single best speaker here - they are built to different priorities, and the right one depends on your room, your amplifier and what you listen to.

AreaBetterWhy
Bassevenly matchedMuch the same reach (46Hz vs 45Hz).
Amplifier needsBKlipsch RP-600M is more sensitive (96dB vs 85dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier matchBKlipsch RP-600M is the easier load at 8 ohms.
HeadroomAELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 takes more power (140W vs 100W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 is easier to place; Klipsch RP-600M is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilityBKlipsch RP-600M: bi-amping. Klipsch RP-600M sits in a wider range (17 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBKlipsch RP-600M is cheaper - $459 against $700, about 34% less.

A ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52  B Klipsch RP-600M
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Klipsch RP-600M is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 if its size, looks or fit in your room suit you better. Match it to your room: we rate ELAC Uni-Fi 2.0 UB52 the better fit for a mid-size room and a large room, and Klipsch RP-600M for near-field listening and a small room. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, Klipsch RP-600M is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction