SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Bookshelf Speakers
  3. Cambridge SX-50 vs KEF Q150

Cambridge SX-50 vs KEF Q150 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Cambridge SX-50

Passive Bookshelf | 50-22k Hz

Cambridge Audio SX-50
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
KEF Q150

Passive Bookshelf | 51-28k Hz

KEF Q150
Check price atAmazon›
Cambridge SX-50 Cambridge SX-50
Check price atAmazon›
KEF Q150 KEF Q150
Check price atAmazon›
Cambridge SX-50
See at AMAZON
KEF Q150
See at AMAZON

Cambridge SX-50 vs KEF Q150 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing SX-50 and Q150, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from Cambridge Audio and KEF.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge SX-50 and KEF Q150 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsCambridge SX-50KEF Q150
BrandCambridge Audio
United Kingdom · founded 1968
KEF
United Kingdom · founded 1961
Design2-way2-way
Uni-Q driver—11th Generation Uni-Q
Tweeter1" Dome1" Dome
Woofer5.25" Treated paper5.25" Aluminum
Frequency response50-22k Hz51-28k Hz
Sensitivity90 dB86 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range10-100 watts10-100 watts
Weight3.00kg / 6.6lbs5.60kg / 12.3lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)8.8" x 6.3" x 9.4"
225.0 x 161.0 x 240.0mm
11.9" x 7.0" x 10.9"
303.0 x 180.0 x 278.0mm

What size room are the Cambridge SX-50 and KEF Q150 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Cambridge SX-50 KEF Q150
Near-field Average Average
Small Room Good Good
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Poor Poor
Very Large Room Bad Bad

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both SX-50 and Q150 are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
Cambridge SX-50
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
KEF Q150

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Cambridge SX-50 KEF Q150
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 1 x 5.25-inch 1 x 5.25-inch

SX-50 features a 1" Silk Dome Tweeter and 1 x 5.25" Treated paper Woofer. On the other hand, the Q150 features a 1" vented aluminum Dome Tweeter and 1 x 5.25" Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2500Hz.

Frequency Response

SX-50 has a frequency range of 50-22k Hz whereas Q150 has a frequency range of 51-28k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 50Hz, the SX-50 can go slightly deeper then the Q150's min frequency of 51Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Bookshelf class in our database.

Low Frequency

Bookshelf Speakers

SX-50
Q150
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

SX-50 and Q150 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. SX-50 sensitivity is rated at 90 dB and the Q150's is at 86 dB. This 4 dB difference makes the Cambridge SX-50 a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF Q150, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Bookshelf Speakers

SX-50
Q150
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

SX-50 and Q150 have the same power range of 10-100 watts.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Cambridge SX-50
 
KEF Q150
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

SX-50 features Post type posts and Q150 has a Post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Cambridge SX-50 Terminals
Cambridge SX-50's 5-way post terminals

KEF Q150 Terminals
KEF Q150's Post terminals

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both SX-50 and Q150 have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.

If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.

Cambridge SX-50  Port
Cambridge SX-50 Port

KEF Q150  Port
KEF Q150 Port

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Cambridge SX-50's and KEF Q150's external dimensions. Cambridge SX-50 has external dimensions of 225.0 x 161.0 x 240.0mm (8.8 x 6.3 x 9.4inch) whereas KEF Q150 has external dimensions of 303.0 x 180.0 x 278.0mm (11.9 x 7.0 x 10.9inch).

KEF Q150 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 19mm wider, 78mm taller and 38mm deeper than Cambridge SX-50.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Cambridge SX-50 and KEF Q150 in scale.

Cambridge SX-50 vs KEF Q150 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Cambridge SX-50 and KEF Q150 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Cambridge SX-50 is approximately 386.4cm2 / 59.9inch2 and base area of the KEF Q150 is approximately 500.4cm2 / 77.6inch2. The SX-50 requires 23% less surface area than the Q150 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Here is another comparison that shows both speakers on a BDI Octave Media Cabinet, next to a standard size amplifier and turntable in scale:

Cambridge SX-50 vs KEF Q150 Size Comparison on a Media Console
Size Comparison image of Cambridge SX-50 and KEF Q150 on a Media Console
Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Cambridge SX-50 weighs 3.00kg / 6.6lbs and the KEF Q150 weighs 5.60kg / 12.3lbs. This makes the Q150 87% heavier than the SX-50.

Here is a comparison of how SX-50 and Q150's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Bookshelf class.

Weight
All Bookshelf Speakers
Cambridge SX-50
KEF Q150
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Cambridge SX-50?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of SX-50:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles
  • 8 Self-adhesive feet
  • 2 Foam port inserts
  • Installation Guide

What's in the Box of KEF Q150?

Here are the items that come with the Q150:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Foam port plugs
  • 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • Owner's Manual
  • Warranty Registration Card


Reasons to choose Cambridge Audio SX-50 over KEF Q150

Sensitivity 90 dB vs 86 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Low Frequency Response 50 Hz vs 51 Hz Generates deeper bass
Height 225mm vs 303mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 386cm2 vs 500cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 199USD vs 600USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Reasons to choose KEF Q150 over Cambridge Audio SX-50

High Frequency Response 28k Hz vs 22k Hz Generates higher frequency

Cambridge SX-50 vs KEF Q150 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Cambridge Audio SX-50 KEF Q150
Brand Cambridge Audio KEF
Speaker Type Bookshelf speakers Bookshelf speakers
Power Range 10-100 watts 10-100 watts
Sensitivity 90 dB 86 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance n/a 3.7 ohms
Frequency Response 50-22k Hz 51-28k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 5.25" 5.25"
Woofer Composition Treated paper Aluminum
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Dome Dome
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Crossover Frequency n/a 2500Hz
Firing Direction rear rear
Physical Specs
Height 225.0mm (8.9") 303.0mm (11.9")
Width 161.0mm (6.3") 180.0mm (7.1")
Depth 240.0mm (9.4") 278.0mm (10.9")
Weight 3.00kg (6.6lbs) 5.60kg (12.3lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF/Woodgrain vinyl MDF/Vinyl-wrapped
Available Colors Black Black, Walnut, White
Mounting Bracket No No
Recommended Stand Height 28-31" 18-24"
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

These sit in different price classes - KEF Q150 costs roughly 3x what Cambridge SX-50 does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.

AreaBetterWhy
Bassevenly matchedMuch the same reach (50Hz vs 51Hz).
Amplifier needsACambridge SX-50 is more sensitive (90dB vs 86dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Headroomevenly matchedSimilar power handling (100W vs 100W).
SizedependsCambridge SX-50 is easier to place; KEF Q150 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilitydependsNeither adds bi-amping, a sub output or height drivers. KEF Q150 sits in a wider range (7 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceACambridge SX-50 is cheaper - $199 against $600, about 67% less; arguably a different class.

A Cambridge SX-50  B KEF Q150
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Cambridge SX-50 has the edge on paper, though the margin is not large. The rows marked "depends" may matter more to you than the score does. In a large or open-plan room, KEF Q150 has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, Cambridge SX-50 is the easier speaker to get right. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, Cambridge SX-50 is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction