SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Bowers Wilkins Speakers
  3. B&W HTM72 S3 vs B&W 702 S3

B&W HTM72 S3 vs B&W 702 S3 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

B&W HTM72 S3

Passive Center Channel | 70-28k Hz

Bowers & Wilkins HTM72 S3
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
B&W 702 S3

Passive Floor-standing | 46-28k Hz

Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3
Check price atAmazon›
B&W HTM72 S3 B&W HTM72 S3
Check price atAmazon›
B&W 702 S3 B&W 702 S3
Check price atAmazon›
B&W HTM72 S3
See at AMAZON
B&W 702 S3
See at AMAZON

B&W HTM72 S3 vs B&W 702 S3 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing two different types of speakers by Bowers Wilkins. Bowers & Wilkins HTM72 S3 is a Center Channel speaker whereas the 702 S3 is a Floor-standing speaker.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of B&W HTM72 S3 and B&W 702 S3 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsB&W HTM72 S3B&W 702 S3
BrandBowers Wilkins
United Kingdom · founded 1966
Bowers Wilkins
United Kingdom · founded 1966
Design2-way3-way
Tweeter1" Decoupled Soft-Dome1"
Midrange—6"
Woofer2 x 5" Continuum cone3 x 6.5" Aerofoil
Frequency response70-28k Hz46-28k Hz
Sensitivity87 dB90 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range30-120 watts30-300 watts
Weight9.70kg / 21.3lbs33.46kg / 73.6lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)6-1/2" x 18-13/16" x 11-15/16"
166.0 x 478.0 x 304.0mm
44.8" x 7.6" x 15.4"
1138.0 x 192.0 x 391.0mm

HTM72 S3 and 702 S3 are members of Bowers Wilkins's 700 S3 series of speakers. Below you can find the loudspeakers from this series.

Bowers Wilkins 700 S3 Series History
Model Body Frequency SensitivityImpedance Woofer
B&W 702 S3
Floor-standing 46-28k Hz 90 dB8Ω 3 x 6.5"
B&W 704 S3
  
Floor-standing 46-28k Hz 88 dB8Ω 2 x 5"
B&W 706 S3
  
Bookshelf 50-28k Hz 88 dB8Ω 1 x 6.5"
B&W 703 S3
  
Floor-standing 46-28k Hz 90 dB8Ω 2 x 6.5"
B&W 707 S3
  
Bookshelf 50-28k Hz 84 dB8Ω 1 x 5"
B&W 705 S3
  
Bookshelf 50-28k Hz 88 dB8Ω 1 x 6.5"
B&W HTM71 S3
  
Center Channel 50-28k Hz 89 dB8Ω 4 x 5"
B&W HTM72 S3
Center Channel 70-28k Hz 87 dB8Ω 2 x 5"

What size room are the B&W HTM72 S3 and B&W 702 S3 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* B&W HTM72 S3 B&W 702 S3
Near-field Poor Bad
Small Room Average Poor
Mid-size Room Good Average
Large Room Average Good
Very Large Room Poor Average

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that HTM72 S3 is a 2-way design whereas the 702 S3 is a 3-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Woofer - 5 inchTweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5 inch
B&W HTM72 S3
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
B&W 702 S3

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver B&W HTM72 S3 B&W 702 S3
Driver Setup 2-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - 1 x 6-inch
Woofer 2 x 5-inch 3 x 6.5-inch

HTM72 S3 features a 1" Decoupled Carbon Decoupled Soft-Dome Tweeter and 2 x 5" Continuum cone Woofer. On the other hand, the 702 S3 features a 1" Tweeter, a 6" Midrange and 3 x 6.5" Aerofoil Woofer.

Frequency Response

HTM72 S3 has a frequency range of 70-28k Hz whereas 702 S3 has a frequency range of 46-28k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 46Hz, the 702 S3 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the HTM72 S3's min frequency of 70Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Center Channel class in our database.

Low Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

HTM72 S3
702 S3
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

HTM72 S3 and 702 S3 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. HTM72 S3 sensitivity is rated at 87 dB and the 702 S3's is at 90 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the B&W 702 S3 a more sensitive speaker compared to B&W HTM72 S3, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Center Channel Speakers

HTM72 S3
702 S3
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

702 S3 can handle a max power of 300 watts RMS, whereas HTM72 S3 has a max power handling value of 120 watts RMS, 180 watts less than the 702 S3.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

B&W HTM72 S3
 
B&W 702 S3
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Both HTM72 S3 and 702 S3 features dual binding post speaker terminals for bi-amping or bi-wiring.

B&W HTM72 S3 Terminals
B&W HTM72 S3's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

B&W 702 S3Binding post Terminals
B&W 702 S3's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both HTM72 S3 and 702 S3 have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.

If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare B&W HTM72 S3's and B&W 702 S3's external dimensions. B&W HTM72 S3 has external dimensions of 166.0 x 478.0 x 304.0mm (6-1/2inch x 18-13/16inch x 11-15/16inch) whereas B&W 702 S3 has external dimensions of 1138.0 x 192.0 x 391.0mm (44.8-inch x 7.6-inch x 15.4-inch).

B&W HTM72 S3 is 972mm shorter and 87mm less deeper than B&W 702 S3 but it is also 286mm wider.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTB&W HTM72 S3 front: 478 x 166 mm (18.8 x 6.5 in)B&W 702 S3 front: 192 x 1138 mm (7.6 x 44.8 in)B&W HTM72 S3478 × 166 mmB&W 702 S3192 × 1138 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTB&W HTM72 S3 footprint: 478 x 304 mm (18.8 x 12 in)B&W 702 S3 footprint: 192 x 391 mm (7.6 x 15.4 in)B&W HTM72 S3478 × 304 mmB&W 702 S3192 × 391 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

B&W HTM72 S3 needs about 94% more floor or shelf area. B&W 702 S3 is 87mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. B&W 702 S3 is 972mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the B&W HTM72 S3 is approximately 1453.1cm2 / 225.2inch2 and base area of the B&W 702 S3 is approximately 750.7cm2 / 116.4inch2. The HTM72 S3 requires 94% more surface area than the 702 S3 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

What's in the Box of B&W HTM72 S3?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of HTM72 S3:
  • Center-channel loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Two-piece foam port plug
  • 4 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • 4 Jumper-straps (pre-installed)
  • Manual
  • Bowers & Wilkins brochure
  • Warranty Information
  • Online Registration Card

What's in the Box of B&W 702 S3?

Here are the items that come with the 702 S3:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Plinth (base)
  • 2 Jumper-straps (pre-installed)
  • Two-piece foam port plug
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • 4 Spike feet
  • 4 Lock-nuts
  • 4 Screws
  • 4 Washers
  • 4 Lock washers
  • Hex-key
  • Manual
  • Bowers & Wilkins brochure
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose Bowers & Wilkins HTM72 S3 over Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3

Height 166mm vs 1138mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Price per pair* 1499USD vs 6998USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Reasons to choose Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 over Bowers & Wilkins HTM72 S3

Max Input Power 300 watts vs 120 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Sensitivity 88 dB vs 87 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Minimum Impedance 3.1 ohms vs 3 ohms Very low impedance levels puts more pressure on amplifier
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5 inches Larger woofer
Number of Woofers 3 vs 2 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 46 Hz vs 70 Hz Generates deeper bass
Base Surface Area 750cm2 vs 1453cm2 Takes less floor space

B&W HTM72 S3 vs B&W 702 S3 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Bowers & Wilkins HTM72 S3 Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3
Brand Bowers Wilkins Bowers Wilkins
Speaker Type Center channel speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 30-120 watts 30-300 watts
Sensitivity 87 dB 90 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 3 ohms 3.1 ohms
Frequency Response 70-28k Hz 46-28k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 3
Woofer Size 5" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Continuum cone Aerofoil
Woofer Surround Material n/a Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Decoupled Soft-Dome n/a
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No 6"
Firing Direction rear rear
Physical Specs
Height 166.0mm (6.5") 1138.0mm (44.8")
Width 478.0mm (18.8") 192.0mm (7.6")
Depth 304.0mm (12") 391.0mm (15.4")
Weight 9.70kg (21.3lbs) 33.46kg (73.6lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish n/a MDF/Lacquer
Available Colors Gloss Black Gloss Black,Satin White,Mocha,Rosenut
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

Siblings in Bowers Wilkins's 700 S3 series, so they share a family sound. It comes down to size, output and price.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBB&W 702 S3 digs deeper - 46Hz against 70Hz.
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (87dB vs 88dB) - both want much the same power.
HeadroomBB&W 702 S3 takes more power (300W vs 120W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsB&W HTM72 S3 is easier to place; B&W 702 S3 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
TypedependsA Passive Center Channel against a Passive Floor-standing - a different job rather than a better one.
ExpandabilitydependsB&W HTM72 S3: bi-amping; B&W 702 S3: bi-amping.
PriceAB&W HTM72 S3 is cheaper - $1,499 against $6,998, about 79% less; arguably a different class.

A B&W HTM72 S3  B B&W 702 S3
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: B&W 702 S3 measures better, B&W HTM72 S3 costs about about 4.7x the price% less. Whether that gap is worth the money is the call only you can make - and in a normal room it is often smaller than the numbers suggest. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 70Hz anyway, which makes the cheaper B&W HTM72 S3 much easier to justify. Match it to your room: we rate B&W HTM72 S3 the better fit for a small room and a mid-size room, and B&W 702 S3 for a large room and a very large room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction