SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers AnthemARCAMDenonIntegraJBLMarantzMcIntoshNADOnkyoSonyYamaha
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive In-wall Speakers
  3. B&W CWM362 vs Monitor Audio W265

B&W CWM362 vs Monitor Audio W265 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

B&W CWM362

Passive In-wall | 50-30kHz

Bowers & Wilkins Flexible Series CWM362
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Monitor Audio W265

Passive In-wall | 55-30kHz

Monitor Audio W265
Check price atAmazon›
B&W CWM362 B&W CWM362
Check price atAmazon›
Monitor Audio W265 Monitor Audio W265
Check price atAmazon›
B&W CWM362
See at AMAZON
Monitor Audio W265
See at AMAZON

B&W CWM362 vs Monitor Audio W265 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing CWM362 and W265, two Passive In-wall speakers from Bowers Wilkins and Monitor Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of B&W CWM362 and Monitor Audio W265 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsB&W CWM362Monitor Audio W265
BrandBowers Wilkins
United Kingdom · founded 1966
Monitor Audio
United Kingdom · founded 1972
Design2-way2-way
Tweeter1" Soft-Dome1" Hard-Dome
Woofer6" Polypropylene6.5" C-CAM
Frequency response50-30kHz55-30kHz
Sensitivity89 dB88.5 dB
Impedance8 ohms6 ohms
Power range10-80 watts20-65 watts
Weight—2.27kg / 5lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)11.0000" x 7.2500" x 3.0000"
280.0 x 185.0 x 77.0mm
13.0625" x 8.3750" x 3.6250"
332.0 x 213.0 x 93.0mm

What size room are the B&W CWM362 and Monitor Audio W265 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* B&W CWM362 Monitor Audio W265
Near-field Average Good
Small Room Good Good
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Poor Poor
Very Large Room Bad No way

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both CWM362 and W265 are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6 inch
B&W CWM362
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Monitor Audio W265

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver B&W CWM362 Monitor Audio W265
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 1 x 6-inch 1 x 6.5-inch

CWM362 features a 1" Soft-Dome Tweeter and 1 x 6" Polypropylene Woofer. On the other hand, the W265 features a 1" Hard-Dome Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" C-CAM Woofer.

Frequency Response

CWM362 has a frequency range of 50-30kHz whereas W265 has a frequency range of 55-30kHz. With a minimum frequency of 50Hz, the CWM362 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the W265's min frequency of 55Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the In-wall class in our database.

Low Frequency

In-wall Speakers

CWM362
W265
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

CWM362 is a 8 ohms speaker compared to the W265 which has a nominal impedance of 6 ohms.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. CWM362 sensitivity is rated at 89 dB and the W265's is rated at 88.5 dB.

Sensitivity

In-wall Speakers

CWM362
W265
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

CWM362 can handle a max power of 80 watts RMS, whereas W265 has a max power handling value of 65 watts RMS, 15 watts less than the CWM362.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

B&W CWM362
 
Monitor Audio W265
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

CWM362 features Spring post type posts and W265 has a Spring post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare B&W CWM362's and Monitor Audio W265's external dimensions. B&W CWM362 has external dimensions of 280.0 x 185.0 x 77.0mm (11.0000-inch x 7.2500-inch x 3.0000-inch) whereas Monitor Audio W265 has external dimensions of 332.0 x 213.0 x 93.0mm (13.0625-inch x 8.3750-inch x 3.6250-inch).

Monitor Audio W265 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 28mm wider, 52mm taller and 16mm deeper than B&W CWM362.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of B&W CWM362 and Monitor Audio W265 in scale.

B&W CWM362 vs Monitor Audio W265 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of B&W CWM362 and Monitor Audio W265 Size and External Dimensions

What's in the Box of B&W CWM362?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of CWM362:
  • 2 In-wall loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles
  • 2 Paint masks
  • Quick Start Guide
  • Wall Mount Cut-Out Template
  • Warranty Information

What's in the Box of Monitor Audio W265?

Here are the items that come with the W265:
  • In-wall speaker
  • Grille
  • Paint skim
  • Installation Guide
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Cutout Template


Reasons to choose Bowers & Wilkins Flexible Series CWM362 over Monitor Audio W265

Max Input Power 80 watts vs 65 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 6 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Low Frequency Response 50 Hz vs 55 Hz Generates deeper bass
Height 280mm vs 332mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 142cm2 vs 198cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 520USD vs 780USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Reasons to choose Monitor Audio W265 over Bowers & Wilkins Flexible Series CWM362

Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 6 inches Larger woofer

B&W CWM362 vs Monitor Audio W265 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Bowers & Wilkins Flexible Series CWM362 Monitor Audio W265
Brand Bowers Wilkins Monitor Audio
Speaker Type Passive In-wall Speaker Passive In-wall Speaker
Power Range 10-80 watts 20-65 watts
Sensitivity 89 dB 88.5 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 6 ohms
Frequency Response 50-30kHz 55-30kHz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 6" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Polypropylene C-CAM
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Soft-Dome Hard-Dome
Aimable Tweeter No Yes
Midrange Driver No No
Physical Specs
Height 280.0mm (11") 332.0mm (13.1")
Width 185.0mm (7.3") 213.0mm (8.4")
Depth 77.0mm (3") 93.0mm (3.7")
Weight n/a 2.27kg (5lbs)
Enclosure In-wall In-wall
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years Lifetime
Labor Warranty 5 Years Lifetime

Verdict

No single best speaker here - they are built to different priorities, and the right one depends on your room, your amplifier and what you listen to.

AreaBetterWhy
BassAB&W CWM362 digs deeper - 50Hz against 55Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (89dB vs 89dB) - both want much the same power.
Amplifier matchAB&W CWM362 is the easier load at 8 ohms.
Headroomevenly matchedSimilar power handling (80W vs 65W).
SizedependsB&W CWM362 is easier to place; Monitor Audio W265 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
PriceAB&W CWM362 is cheaper - $520 against $780, about 33% less.

A B&W CWM362  B Monitor Audio W265
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

B&W CWM362 is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take Monitor Audio W265 if its size, looks or fit in your room suit you better. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 55Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate Monitor Audio W265 the better fit for near-field listening; elsewhere the two are rated the same.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction