SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive In-wall Speakers
  3. B&W CWM362 vs B&W CWM664

B&W CWM362 vs B&W CWM664 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

B&W CWM362

Passive In-wall | 50-30kHz

Bowers & Wilkins Flexible Series CWM362
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
B&W CWM664

Passive In-wall | 45-35kHz

Bowers & Wilkins Performance Series CWM664
Check price atAmazon›
B&W CWM362 B&W CWM362
Check price atAmazon›
B&W CWM664 B&W CWM664
Check price atAmazon›
B&W CWM362
See at AMAZON
B&W CWM664
See at AMAZON

B&W CWM362 vs B&W CWM664 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing CWM362 and CWM664, two Passive In-wall speakers by Bowers Wilkins.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of B&W CWM362 and B&W CWM664 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsB&W CWM362B&W CWM664
BrandBowers Wilkins
United Kingdom · founded 1966
Bowers Wilkins
United Kingdom · founded 1966
Design2-way2-way
Tweeter1" Soft-Dome1" Soft-Dome
Woofer6" Polypropylene6" Glass-fiber
Frequency response50-30kHz45-35kHz
Sensitivity89 dB87.5 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range10-80 watts25-130 watts
Dimensions (H x W x D)11.0000" x 7.2500" x 3.0000"
280.0 x 185.0 x 77.0mm
11.0000" x 7.2500" x 3.7500"
280.0 x 185.0 x 96.0mm

What size room are the B&W CWM362 and B&W CWM664 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* B&W CWM362 B&W CWM664
Near-field Average Poor
Small Room Good Average
Mid-size Room Average Good
Large Room Poor Average
Very Large Room Bad Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both CWM362 and CWM664 are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6 inch
B&W CWM362
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6 inch
B&W CWM664

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver B&W CWM362 B&W CWM664
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 1 x 6-inch 1 x 6-inch

CWM362 features a 1" Soft-Dome Tweeter and 1 x 6" Polypropylene Woofer. On the other hand, the CWM664 features a 1" Soft-Dome Tweeter and 1 x 6" Glass-fiber Woofer.

Frequency Response

CWM362 has a frequency range of 50-30kHz whereas CWM664 has a frequency range of 45-35kHz. With a minimum frequency of 45Hz, the CWM664 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the CWM362's min frequency of 50Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the In-wall class in our database.

Low Frequency

In-wall Speakers

CWM362
CWM664
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

CWM362 and CWM664 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. CWM362 sensitivity is rated at 89 dB and the CWM664's is at 87.5 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the B&W CWM362 a more sensitive speaker compared to B&W CWM664, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

In-wall Speakers

CWM362
CWM664
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

CWM664 can handle a max power of 130 watts RMS, whereas CWM362 has a max power handling value of 80 watts RMS, 50 watts less than the CWM664.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

B&W CWM362
 
B&W CWM664
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

CWM362 features Spring post type posts and CWM664 has a Spring post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare B&W CWM362's and B&W CWM664's external dimensions. B&W CWM362 has external dimensions of 280.0 x 185.0 x 77.0mm (11.0000-inch x 7.2500-inch x 3.0000-inch) whereas B&W CWM664 has external dimensions of 280.0 x 185.0 x 96.0mm (11.0000-inch x 7.2500-inch x 3.7500-inch).

B&W CWM362 has the same height and width with B&W CWM664. On the other hand, with a thickness of 77.0mm, it is 19mm less deeper.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of B&W CWM362 and B&W CWM664 in scale.

B&W CWM362 vs B&W CWM664 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of B&W CWM362 and B&W CWM664 Size and External Dimensions

What's in the Box of B&W CWM362?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of CWM362:
  • 2 In-wall loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles
  • 2 Paint masks
  • Quick Start Guide
  • Wall Mount Cut-Out Template
  • Warranty Information

What's in the Box of B&W CWM664?

Here are the items that come with the CWM664:
  • 2 In-wall loudspeakers
  • 2 Mounting frames
  • 2 Grilles
  • 2 Paint mask
  • 2 Cut-out templates
  • Quick Start Guide
  • Template
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose Bowers & Wilkins Flexible Series CWM362 over Bowers & Wilkins Performance Series CWM664

Sensitivity 89 dB vs 88 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Base Surface Area 142cm2 vs 177cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 520USD vs 700USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Reasons to choose Bowers & Wilkins Performance Series CWM664 over Bowers & Wilkins Flexible Series CWM362

Max Input Power 130 watts vs 80 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Low Frequency Response 45 Hz vs 50 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 35k Hz vs 30k Hz Generates higher frequency

B&W CWM362 vs B&W CWM664 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Bowers & Wilkins Flexible Series CWM362 Bowers & Wilkins Performance Series CWM664
Brand Bowers Wilkins Bowers Wilkins
Speaker Type Passive In-wall Speaker Passive In-wall Speaker
Power Range 10-80 watts 25-130 watts
Sensitivity 89 dB 87.5 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 50-30kHz 45-35kHz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 6" 6"
Woofer Composition Polypropylene Glass-fiber
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Soft-Dome Soft-Dome
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Physical Specs
Height 280.0mm (11") 280.0mm (11")
Width 185.0mm (7.3") 185.0mm (7.3")
Depth 77.0mm (3") 96.0mm (3.8")
Enclosure In-wall In-wall
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

Both are Bowers Wilkins, from different ranges - so the house sound is shared and the differences are mostly in scale, engineering and price.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBB&W CWM664 digs deeper - 45Hz against 50Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (89dB vs 88dB) - both want much the same power.
HeadroomBB&W CWM664 takes more power (130W vs 80W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
PriceAB&W CWM362 is cheaper - $520 against $700, about 26% less.

A B&W CWM362  B B&W CWM664
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: B&W CWM664 measures better, B&W CWM362 costs about about 35% more% less. Whether that gap is worth the money is the call only you can make - and in a normal room it is often smaller than the numbers suggest. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 50Hz anyway, which makes the cheaper B&W CWM362 much easier to justify. Match it to your room: we rate B&W CWM362 the better fit for near-field listening and a small room, and B&W CWM664 for a mid-size room and a large room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction