SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. B&W 702 S3 vs KEF R11

B&W 702 S3 vs KEF R11 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

B&W 702 S3

Passive Floor-standing | 46-28k Hz

Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
KEF R11

Passive Floor-standing | 46-28k Hz

KEF R11
Check price atAmazon›
B&W 702 S3 B&W 702 S3
Check price atAmazon›
KEF R11 KEF R11
Check price atAmazon›
B&W 702 S3
See at AMAZON
KEF R11
See at AMAZON

B&W 702 S3 vs KEF R11 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing 702 S3 and R11, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from Bowers Wilkins and KEF.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of B&W 702 S3 and KEF R11 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsB&W 702 S3KEF R11
BrandBowers Wilkins
United Kingdom · founded 1966
KEF
United Kingdom · founded 1961
Design3-way3-way
Uni-Q driver—12th Generation Uni-Q
Tweeter1"1" Dome
Midrange6"5"
Woofer3 x 6.5" Aerofoil4 x 6.5" Hybrid Aluminum
Frequency response46-28k Hz46-28k Hz
Sensitivity90 dB90 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range30-300 watts15-300 watts
Weight33.46kg / 73.6lbs37.70kg / 82.9lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)44.8" x 7.6" x 15.4"
1138.0 x 192.0 x 391.0mm
51-3/16" x 12-1/4" x 15-5/16"
1301.0 x 312.0 x 389.0mm

What size room are the B&W 702 S3 and KEF R11 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* B&W 702 S3 KEF R11
Near-field Bad Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Average Average

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both 702 S3 and R11 are 3-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
B&W 702 S3
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
KEF R11

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver B&W 702 S3 KEF R11
Driver Setup 3-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 6-inch 1 x 5-inch
Woofer 3 x 6.5-inch 4 x 6.5-inch

702 S3 features a 1" Tweeter, a 6" Midrange and 3 x 6.5" Aerofoil Woofer. On the other hand, the R11 features a 1" aluminum Dome Tweeter, a 5" Midrange and 4 x 6.5" Hybrid Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 400Hz and 2900Hz.

Frequency Response

702 S3 and R11 has exactly the same frequency range of 46-28k Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

702 S3
R11
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

702 S3 and R11 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms and their sensitivity is also same at 88 dB.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

702 S3
R11
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Both handle the same maximum of 300 watts RMS, though 702 S3 is rated 30-300 watts and R11 15-300 watts.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

B&W 702 S3
 
KEF R11
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Both 702 S3 and R11 features dual binding post speaker terminals for bi-amping or bi-wiring.

B&W 702 S3 Terminals
B&W 702 S3's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

KEF R11 Terminals
KEF R11's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both 702 S3 and R11 have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.

If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare B&W 702 S3's and KEF R11's external dimensions. B&W 702 S3 has external dimensions of 1138.0 x 192.0 x 391.0mm (44.8-inch x 7.6-inch x 15.4-inch) whereas KEF R11 has external dimensions of 1301.0 x 312.0 x 389.0mm (51-3/16 x 12-1/4 x 15-5/16inch).

B&W 702 S3 is 120mm narrower and 163mm shorter than KEF R11 but it is also 2mm deeper.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of B&W 702 S3 and KEF R11 in scale.

B&W 702 S3 vs KEF R11 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of B&W 702 S3 and KEF R11 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the B&W 702 S3 is approximately 750.7cm2 / 116.4inch2 and base area of the KEF R11 is approximately 1213.7cm2 / 188.1inch2. The 702 S3 requires 38% less surface area than the R11 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The B&W 702 S3 weighs 33.46kg / 73.6lbs and the KEF R11 weighs 37.70kg / 82.9lbs. This makes the R11 13% heavier than the 702 S3.

Here is a comparison of how 702 S3 and R11's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
B&W 702 S3
KEF R11
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of B&W 702 S3?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of 702 S3:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Plinth (base)
  • 2 Jumper-straps (pre-installed)
  • Two-piece foam port plug
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • 4 Spike feet
  • 4 Lock-nuts
  • 4 Screws
  • 4 Washers
  • 4 Lock washers
  • Hex-key
  • Manual
  • Bowers & Wilkins brochure
  • Warranty Information

What's in the Box of KEF R11?

Here are the items that come with the R11:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • 2 Foam port plugs
  • 4 Outrigger feet
  • 4 Spikes
  • 4 Protective discs
  • 4 Screws
  • 4 Washers
  • Wrench
  • Hex-key
  • User Manual
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 over KEF R11

Height 1138mm vs 1301mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 750cm2 vs 1213cm2 Takes less floor space

Reasons to choose KEF R11 over Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3

Sensitivity 90 dB vs 88 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Minimum Impedance 3.2 ohms vs 3.1 ohms Very low impedance levels puts more pressure on amplifier
Number of Woofers 4 vs 3 More woofers
Price per pair* 6000USD vs 6998USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

B&W 702 S3 vs KEF R11 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 KEF R11
Brand Bowers Wilkins KEF
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 30-300 watts 15-300 watts
Sensitivity 90 dB 90 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 3.1 ohms 3.2 ohms
Frequency Response 46-28k Hz 46-28k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 3 4
Woofer Size 6.5" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Aerofoil Hybrid Aluminum
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type n/a Dome
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 6" 5"
Crossover Frequency n/a 400Hz and 2900Hz
Firing Direction rear rear
Physical Specs
Height 1138.0mm (44.8") 1301.0mm (51.2")
Width 192.0mm (7.6") 312.0mm (12.3")
Depth 391.0mm (15.4") 389.0mm (15.3")
Weight 33.46kg (73.6lbs) 37.70kg (82.9lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF/Lacquer MDF/Lacquer
Available Colors Gloss Black,Satin White,Mocha,Rosenut Black Gloss, White Gloss, Walnut
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

A generation apart: B&W 702 S3 is the newer design, against a 2018 model. Newer is not automatically better, but the older one is more likely to be discounted or near run-out.

AreaBetterWhy
Bassevenly matchedMuch the same reach (46Hz vs 46Hz).
Amplifier needsBKEF R11 is more sensitive (90dB vs 88dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Headroomevenly matchedSimilar power handling (300W vs 300W).
SizedependsB&W 702 S3 is easier to place; KEF R11 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilitydependsB&W 702 S3: bi-amping; KEF R11: bi-amping. B&W 702 S3 sits in a wider range (8 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBKEF R11 is cheaper - $6,000 against $6,998, about 14% less.

A B&W 702 S3  B KEF R11
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

KEF R11 has the edge on paper, though the margin is not large. The rows marked "depends" may matter more to you than the score does. In a large or open-plan room, KEF R11 has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, B&W 702 S3 is the easier speaker to get right. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, KEF R11 is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction