SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers AnthemARCAMDenonIntegraJBLMarantzMcIntoshNADOnkyoSonyYamaha
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. B&W 603 S3 vs Polk R700

B&W 603 S3 vs Polk R700 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

B&W 603 S3

Passive Floor-standing | 46-28k Hz

Bowers & Wilkins 603 S3
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Polk R700

Passive Floor-standing | 38-38k Hz

Polk Audio Reserve R700
Check price atAmazon›
B&W 603 S3 B&W 603 S3
Check price atAmazon›
Polk R700 Polk R700
Check price atAmazon›
B&W 603 S3
See at AMAZON
Polk R700
See at AMAZON

B&W 603 S3 vs Polk R700 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing 603 S3 and R700, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from Bowers Wilkins and Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of B&W 603 S3 and Polk R700 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsB&W 603 S3Polk R700
BrandBowers Wilkins
United Kingdom · founded 1966
Polk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Design3-way3-way
Tweeter1" Decoupled Double Dome1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator
Midrange6"6.5"
Woofer2 x 6.5" Paper2 x 8" Polypropylene
Frequency response46-28k Hz38-38k Hz
Sensitivity90 dB88 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range30-200 watts50-300 watts
Weight27.50kg / 60.5lbs35.90kg / 79lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)38.8" x 7.5" x 14.5"
985.0 x 190.0 x 368.0mm
45" x 12.6" x 16.9"
1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3mm

What size room are the B&W 603 S3 and Polk R700 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* B&W 603 S3 Polk R700
Near-field Bad Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Good Average
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Poor Average

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both 603 S3 and R700 are 3-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
B&W 603 S3
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6.5 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inch
Polk R700

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver B&W 603 S3 Polk R700
Driver Setup 3-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 6-inch 1 x 6.5-inch
Woofer 2 x 6.5-inch 2 x 8-inch

603 S3 features a 1" Titanium Decoupled Double Dome Tweeter, a 6" Midrange and 2 x 6.5" Paper Woofer. On the other hand, the R700 features a 1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator Tweeter, a 6.5" Midrange and 2 x 8" Polypropylene Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 350Hz and 2700Hz.

Frequency Response

603 S3 has a frequency range of 46-28k Hz whereas R700 has a frequency range of 38-38k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 38Hz, the R700 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the 603 S3's min frequency of 46Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

603 S3
R700
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

603 S3 and R700 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. 603 S3 sensitivity is rated at 90 dB and the R700's is at 88 dB. This 2 dB difference makes the B&W 603 S3 a more sensitive speaker compared to Polk R700, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

603 S3
R700
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

R700 can handle a max power of 300 watts RMS, whereas 603 S3 has a max power handling value of 200 watts RMS, 100 watts less than the R700.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

B&W 603 S3
 
Polk R700
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Both 603 S3 and R700 features dual binding post speaker terminals for bi-amping or bi-wiring.

B&W 603 S3 Terminals
B&W 603 S3's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Polk R700Post Terminals
Polk R700's Post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Cabinet Type and Port Position

603 S3 has a rear firing port whereas R700 has a bottom firing ports. Polk R700's bottom-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to B&W 603 S3 with its rear-firing port.

Polk R700  Port
Polk R700 Port

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare B&W 603 S3's and Polk R700's external dimensions. B&W 603 S3 has external dimensions of 985.0 x 190.0 x 368.0mm (38.8 x 7.5 x 14.5inch) whereas Polk R700 has external dimensions of 1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3mm (45 x 12.6 x 16.9inch).

Polk R700 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 130.7mm wider, 158.8mm taller and 60.3mm deeper than B&W 603 S3.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of B&W 603 S3 and Polk R700 in scale.

B&W 603 S3 vs Polk R700 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of B&W 603 S3 and Polk R700 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the B&W 603 S3 is approximately 699.2cm2 / 108.4inch2 and base area of the Polk R700 is approximately 1373.6cm2 / 212.9inch2. The 603 S3 requires 49% less surface area than the R700 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The B&W 603 S3 weighs 27.50kg / 60.5lbs and the Polk R700 weighs 35.90kg / 79lbs. This makes the R700 31% heavier than the 603 S3.

Here is a comparison of how 603 S3 and R700's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
B&W 603 S3
Polk R700
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of B&W 603 S3?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of 603 S3:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Plinith (base)
  • 2 Jumper-straps (pre-installed)
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • 4 Spike feet
  • 4 Hex-nuts
  • 4 Screws
  • 4 Washers
  • 4 Lock-washers
  • Two-piece foam port plug
  • Hex-key
  • Manual
  • Bowers & Wilkins brochure
  • Warranty Information

What's in the Box of Polk R700?

Here are the items that come with the R700:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • 4 Outrigger feet (pre-installed)
  • 4 Rubber feet (pre-installed)
  • 4 Spike feet (pre-installed)
  • Grille
  • Hex-key
  • Owner's Manual
  • Online Registration


Reasons to choose Bowers & Wilkins 603 S3 over Polk Audio Reserve R700

Sensitivity 90 dB vs 88 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Height 985mm vs 1143mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 699cm2 vs 1373cm2 Takes less floor space

Reasons to choose Polk Audio Reserve R700 over Bowers & Wilkins 603 S3

Max Input Power 300 watts vs 200 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Minimum Impedance 3.6 ohms vs 3 ohms Very low impedance levels puts more pressure on amplifier
Woofer Size 8 inches vs 6.5 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 38 Hz vs 46 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 38k Hz vs 28k Hz Generates higher frequency
Price per pair* 2198USD vs 2700USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

B&W 603 S3 vs Polk R700 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Bowers & Wilkins 603 S3 Polk Audio Reserve R700
Brand Bowers Wilkins Polk Audio
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 30-200 watts 50-300 watts
Sensitivity 90 dB 88 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 3 ohms 3.6 ohms
Frequency Response 46-28k Hz 38-38k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 2
Woofer Size 6.5" 8"
Woofer Composition Paper Polypropylene
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Decoupled Double Dome Pinnacle Ring Radiator
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 6" 6.5"
Crossover Frequency n/a 350Hz and 2700Hz
Firing Direction rear bottom
Physical Specs
Height 985.0mm (38.8") 1143.8mm (45")
Width 190.0mm (7.5") 320.7mm (12.6")
Depth 368.0mm (14.5") 428.3mm (16.9")
Weight 27.50kg (60.5lbs) 35.90kg (79lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF/Vinyl MDF/Vinyl
Available Colors Matte Black, Matte White, Oak, Red Cherry Black, Walnut, White
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Verdict

No single best speaker here - they are built to different priorities, and the right one depends on your room, your amplifier and what you listen to.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBPolk R700 digs deeper - 38Hz against 46Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsAB&W 603 S3 is more sensitive (90dB vs 88dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
HeadroomBPolk R700 takes more power (300W vs 200W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsB&W 603 S3 is easier to place; Polk R700 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilitydependsB&W 603 S3: bi-amping; Polk R700: bi-amping. Polk R700 sits in a wider range (10 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBPolk R700 is cheaper - $2,198 against $2,700, about 19% less.

A B&W 603 S3  B Polk R700
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Polk R700 has the edge on paper, though the margin is not large. The rows marked "depends" may matter more to you than the score does. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 46Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate B&W 603 S3 the better fit for a mid-size room, and Polk R700 for a very large room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction