SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND

AE320 vs Triangle Borea BR09 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

AE320

Passive Floor-standing | 35Hz - 30kHz

Acoustic Energy AE320
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Triangle Borea BR09

Passive Floor-standing | 35 - 22k Hz

Triangle Borea BR09
CHECK PRICE
AE320 AE320
See at AMAZON
Triangle Borea BR09 Triangle Borea BR09
See at AMAZON
AE320
See at AMAZON
Triangle Borea BR09
See at AMAZON
AE320 vs Triangle Borea BR09 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing AE320 and Borea BR09, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from Acoustic Energy and Triangle.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of AE320 and Triangle Borea BR09 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

AE320 Key Specs

  • 3-way Design
  • 1.1" dome with waveguide Tweeter
  • 5.2" Midrange
  • 2 x 5.2" ceramic aluminium sandwich Woofer
  • 35Hz - 30kHz Frequency Response
  • 90 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:up to 200watts
  • Weight:26.00kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 1000.0" x 6.9" x 10.2"( 1000.0 x 175.0 x 260.0mm )

Triangle Borea BR09 Key Specs

  • 3-way Design
  • 1" dome Tweeter
  • 6" Midrange
  • 3 x 6" fiberglass Woofer
  • 6" Midrange
  • 35 - 22k Hz Frequency Response
  • 92.5 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:up to 170watts
  • Weight:21.80kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 1095.0" x 8.1" x 12.3"( 1095.0 x 206.0 x 314.0mm )

What size room are the AE320 and Triangle Borea BR09 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* AE320 Triangle Borea BR09
Near-field Bad Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Good Good
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Poor Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the AE320 and Triangle Borea BR09 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both AE320 and Borea BR09 are 3-way speakers.

Driver AE320 Triangle Borea BR09
Driver Setup 3-way 3-way
Tweeter 1.1-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 5.2-inch 1 x 6-inch
Woofer 2 x 5.2-inch 3 x 6-inch

AE320 features a 1.1" aluminium dome with waveguide Tweeter , a 5.2" Midrange and 2 x 5.2" ceramic aluminium sandwich Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 380Hz and 3400Hz. On the other hand, the Borea BR09 features a 1" silk dome Tweeter , a 6" Midrange and 3 x 6" fiberglass Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 310Hz and 3900Hz.

Frequency Response

AE320 has a frequency range of 35Hz - 30kHz whereas Borea BR09 has a frequency range of 35 - 22k Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

AE320
Borea BR09
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

AE320
Triangle Borea BR09
Min
Average
Max

None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

AE320 and Borea BR09 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. AE320 sensitivity is rated at 90 dB and the Borea BR09's is at 92.5 dB. This 3 dB difference makes the Triangle Borea BR09 a more sensitive speaker compared to AE320, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

AE320
Borea BR09
Min
Average
Max

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.

AE320 can handle a max power of 200 watts RMS from the amp the whereas Borea BR09 has a max power handling value of 170 watts RMS, 30 watts less than the AE320.

Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.

Cabinet Type and Port Position

AE320 has a rear firing port whereas Borea BR09 has a front firing ports. Triangle Borea BR09's front-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to AE320 with its rear-firing port.

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare AE320's and Triangle Borea BR09's external dimensions. AE320 has external dimensions of 1000.0 x 175.0 x 260.0mm ( 39.4 x 6.9 x 10.2inch) whereas Triangle Borea BR09 has external dimensions of 1095.0 x 206.0 x 314.0mm ( 43.1 x 8.1 x 12.3inch) .

Triangle Borea BR09 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 31mm wider, 95mm taller and 54mm deeper than AE320.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the AE320 is approximately 455.0cm2 / 70.5inch2 and base area of the Triangle Borea BR09 is approximately 646.8cm2 / 100.3inch2. The AE320 requires 30% less surface area than the Borea BR09 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The AE320 weighs 26.00kg / 57.2lbs and the Triangle Borea BR09 weighs 21.80kg / 48lbs. This makes the AE320 19% heavier than the Borea BR09.

Here is a comparison of how AE320 and Borea BR09's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
AE320
Triangle Borea BR09
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Triangle Borea BR09?

Here are the items that come with the Borea BR09:
  • 2 x Borea speakers
  • 2 x protections grids
  • 2 x pedestals
  • 8 x screws
  • 8 x adhesive rubber plots
  • 8 x decoupling spikes
  • 1 x user manual

  • Reasons to choose Acoustic Energy AE320 over Triangle Borea BR09
    Max Input Power 200 watts vs 170 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
    High Frequency Response 30k Hz vs 22k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Height 1000mm vs 1095mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 455cm2 vs 646cm2 Takes less floor space

    Reasons to choose Triangle Borea BR09 over Acoustic Energy AE320

    Sensitivity 93 dB vs 90 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
    Woofer Size 6 inches vs 5.2 inches Larger woofer
    Number of Woofers 3 vs 2 More woofers
    Port Position Front vs Rear Gives more flexibility placing close to walls
    Price per pair* 1850USD vs 2699USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    AE320 vs Triangle Borea BR09 Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General Acoustic Energy AE320 Triangle Borea BR09
    Brand Acoustic Energy Triangle
    Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
    Power Range up to 200 watts up to 170 watts
    Sensitivity 90 dB 92.5 dB
    Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
    Impedance n/a 3.3 ohms
    Frequency Response 35Hz - 30kHz 35 - 22k Hz
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 2 3
    Woofer Size 5.2" 6"
    Woofer Composition ceramic aluminium sandwich fiberglass
    Tweeter Size 1.1" 1"
    Tweeter Type dome with waveguide dome
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver 5.2" 6"
    Crossover Frequency 380Hz and 3400Hz 310Hz and 3900Hz
    Firing Direction rear front
    Physical Specs
    Height 1000.0mm (39.4") 1095.0mm (43.1")
    Width 175.0mm (6.9") 206.0mm (8.1")
    Depth 260.0mm (10.2") 314.0mm (12.4")
    Weight 26.00kg (57.2lbs) 21.80kg (48lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
    Finish high density MDF n/a
    Available Colors Piano Gloss White, Piano Gloss Black, Real Walnut wood veneer Light Oak, Walnut, Black, White
    Grille Yes Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Biamp Inputs n/a No
    Other
    Parts Warranty 5 Years
    Labor Warranty 5 Years

    Most Popular Speakers
    Klipsch Reference R-51M
    Klipsch R-51M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
    B&W 606 S2
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    KEF Q150
    KEF Q150
    2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
    Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
    Klipsch RP-500M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606
    B&W 606
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction