SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. ATC SCM100ASLT vs MartinLogan Foundation F1

ATC SCM100ASLT vs MartinLogan Foundation F1 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

ATC SCM100ASLT

Powered Floor-standing | 65-17k Hz

ATC SCM100ASLT
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
MartinLogan Foundation F1

Passive Floor-standing | 41-23k Hz

MartinLogan Foundation F1
Check price atAmazon›
ATC SCM100ASLT ATC SCM100ASLT
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan Foundation F1 MartinLogan Foundati...
Check price atAmazon›
ATC SCM100ASLT
See at AMAZON
MartinLogan Foundati...
See at AMAZON

ATC SCM100ASLT vs MartinLogan Foundation F1 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing SCM100ASLT and Foundation F1, two Floor-standing speakers from ATC and MartinLogan. The main difference between these two speakers is that the ATC SCM100ASLT is a Powered speaker which means that it has a built-in amplifier inside the speaker body so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp whereas the MartinLogan Foundation F1 is a Passive speaker so has to be matched with an amplifier to get any sound from it.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of ATC SCM100ASLT and MartinLogan Foundation F1 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsATC SCM100ASLTMartinLogan Foundation F1
BrandATC
United Kingdom · founded 1974
MartinLogan
United States · founded 1982
Design3-way3-way
Built-in amplifierYes—
Tweeter0.98"1" Folded Motion Ribbon
Midrange2.95"5.5"
Woofer12.36"3 x 5.5" Aluminum
Frequency response65-17k Hz41-23k Hz
Sensitivity88 dB92 dB
Impedance8 ohms4 ohms
Power range100 to 1500 Watts wattsup to 200 watts
Weight63.00kg / 138.6lbs21.14kg / 46.5lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)45.94" x 16.85" x 22.87"
1167.0 x 428.0 x 581.0mm
41-7/16" x 8-3/8" x 14-7/16"
1053.0 x 213.0 x 367.0mm

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both SCM100ASLT and Foundation F1 are 3-way speakers.

Tweeter - 0.98 inchMidrange - 2.95 inchWoofer - 12.36 inch
ATC SCM100ASLT
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 5.5 inchWoofer - 5.5 inchWoofer - 5.5 inchWoofer - 5.5 inch
MartinLogan Foundation F1

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver ATC SCM100ASLT MartinLogan Foundation F1
Driver Setup 3-way 3-way
Tweeter 0.98-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 2.95-inch 1 x 5.5-inch
Woofer 1 x 12.36-inch 3 x 5.5-inch

SCM100ASLT features a 0.98" Tweeter, a 2.95" Midrange and 1 x 12.36" Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 380Hz & 3.5kHz. On the other hand, the Foundation F1 features a 1" Gen2 Obsidian Folded Motion Ribbon Tweeter, a 5.5" Midrange and 3 x 5.5" Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 240 Hz - 3700 Hz.

ATC SCM100ASLT driver frequency bandsATC SCM100ASLTMartinLogan Foundation F165-38041-240Woofer380-3.5k240-3.7kMidrange3.5k-17k3.7k-23kTweeter20501002005001k2k5k10k20k40kHz, log scale

Frequency Response

SCM100ASLT has a frequency range of 65-17k Hz whereas Foundation F1 has a frequency range of 41-23k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 41Hz, the Foundation F1 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the SCM100ASLT's min frequency of 65Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

SCM100ASLT
Foundation F1
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

SCM100ASLT is a 8 ohms speaker compared to the Foundation F1 which has a nominal impedance of 4 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the Foundation F1 can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. SCM100ASLT sensitivity is rated at 88 dB and the Foundation F1's is rated at 92 dB. This 4 dB difference makes the MartinLogan Foundation F1 a more sensitive speaker compared to ATC SCM100ASLT, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

SCM100ASLT
Foundation F1
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

SCM100ASLT can handle a max power of 1500 watts RMS, whereas Foundation F1 has a max power handling value of 200 watts RMS, 1300 watts less than the SCM100ASLT.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

SCM100ASLT features Binding post type posts and Foundation F1 has a Binding post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

MartinLogan Foundation F1Binding post Terminals
MartinLogan Foundation F1's Binding post terminals

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare ATC SCM100ASLT's and MartinLogan Foundation F1's external dimensions. ATC SCM100ASLT has external dimensions of 1167.0 x 428.0 x 581.0mm (45.94 x 16.85 x 22.87inch) whereas MartinLogan Foundation F1 has external dimensions of 1053.0 x 213.0 x 367.0mm (41-7/16inch x 8-3/8inch x 14-7/16inch).

ATC SCM100ASLT is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 215mm wider, 114mm taller and 214mm deeper than MartinLogan Foundation F1.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTATC SCM100ASLT front: 428 x 1167 mm (16.9 x 45.9 in)MartinLogan Foundation F1 front: 213 x 1053 mm (8.4 x 41.5 in)ATC SCM100ASLT428 × 1167 mmMartinLogan Foundation F1213 × 1053 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTATC SCM100ASLT footprint: 428 x 581 mm (16.9 x 22.9 in)MartinLogan Foundation F1 footprint: 213 x 367 mm (8.4 x 14.4 in)ATC SCM100ASLT428 × 581 mmMartinLogan Foundation F1213 × 367 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

ATC SCM100ASLT needs about 218% more floor or shelf area. ATC SCM100ASLT is 214mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. ATC SCM100ASLT is 114mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the ATC SCM100ASLT is approximately 2486.7cm2 / 385.4inch2 and base area of the MartinLogan Foundation F1 is approximately 781.7cm2 / 121.2inch2. The SCM100ASLT requires 218% more surface area than the Foundation F1 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.


Reasons to choose ATC SCM100ASLT over MartinLogan Foundation F1

Speaker Type Powered vs Passive Built-in amplifier
Max Input Power 1500 watts vs 200 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Woofer Size 12.36 inches vs 5.5 inches Larger woofer

Reasons to choose MartinLogan Foundation F1 over ATC SCM100ASLT

Sensitivity 92 dB vs 88 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Number of Woofers 3 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 41 Hz vs 65 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 23k Hz vs 17k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 1053mm vs 1167mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 781cm2 vs 2486cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 1499USD vs 36999USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

ATC SCM100ASLT vs MartinLogan Foundation F1 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General ATC SCM100ASLT MartinLogan Foundation F1
Brand ATC MartinLogan
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 100 to 1500 Watts watts up to 200 watts
Sensitivity 88 dB 92 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 4 ohms
Frequency Response 65-17k Hz 41-23k Hz
Amplifier
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 3
Woofer Size 12.36" 5.5"
Woofer Composition Aluminum
Tweeter Size 0.98" 1"
Tweeter Type n/a Folded Motion Ribbon
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 2.95" 5.5"
Crossover Frequency 380Hz & 3.5kHz 240 Hz - 3700 Hz
Firing Direction n/a rear
Physical Specs
Height 1167.0mm (45.9") 1053.0mm (41.5")
Width 428.0mm (16.9") 213.0mm (8.4")
Depth 581.0mm (22.9") 367.0mm (14.4")
Weight 63.00kg (138.6lbs) 21.14kg (46.5lbs)
Enclosure Sealed Bass Reflex
Available Colors n/a Walnut,Black,Satin White
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs n/a No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 years
Labor Warranty 5 years

Verdict

Different kinds of product: one is active with its amplifier built in, the other passive and needs one. Judge them on how you want to own the system, not just the specs.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBMartinLogan Foundation F1 digs deeper - 41Hz against 65Hz.
What you buydependsATC SCM100ASLT is a complete system - just add a source. MartinLogan Foundation F1 also needs an amplifier: more money and another box, but you choose it.
ConnectionsdependsWith MartinLogan Foundation F1 that all comes from the amplifier you pair it with.
Upgrade pathdependsMartinLogan Foundation F1 can be re-amped later and outlive several amplifiers; ATC SCM100ASLT ages as one unit.
SizedependsMartinLogan Foundation F1 is easier to place; ATC SCM100ASLT is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
CabinetdependsSealed vs Ported. Sealed is tighter and happier near a wall; ported digs lower but wants space behind it.
PriceBMartinLogan Foundation F1 is cheaper - $1,499 against $36,999, about 96% less; arguably a different class. Speakers only - an amplifier narrows that gap.

A ATC SCM100ASLT  B MartinLogan Foundation F1
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

ATC SCM100ASLT suits you if you want one box, ready to play, with nothing else to buy. MartinLogan Foundation F1 suits you if you already have an amplifier, want to choose the electronics, or expect to upgrade in stages. Neither is the better speaker in the abstract. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 65Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate ATC SCM100ASLT the better fit for a very large room, and MartinLogan Foundation F1 for a mid-size room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction