SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Powered Subwoofers
  3. Sonus faber Gravis VI vs Polk Monitor XT12
Sonus faber Gravis VI vs Polk Audio Monitor XT12 Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Sonus faber Gravis VI

Powered Subwoofer | 18-120 Hz

Sonus faber Gravis VI
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Polk Monitor XT12

Powered Subwoofer | 24-160 Hz

Polk Monitor XT12
Check price atAmazon›
Sonus faber Gravis VI Sonus faber Gravis V...
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Monitor XT12 Polk Monitor XT12
Check price atAmazon›
Sonus faber Gravis V...
See at AMAZON
Polk Monitor XT12
See at AMAZON

Sonus faber Gravis VI vs Polk Monitor XT12 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Gravis VI and Monitor XT12, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Sonus faber and Polk Audio. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Sonus faber Gravis VI and Polk Monitor XT12 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsSonus faber Gravis VIPolk Monitor XT12
BrandSonus faber
Italy · founded 1983
Polk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Driver2 x 12.5" Honeycomb sandwich12" Bi-laminate paper
Amplifier1700 watts RMS50 watts RMS
EnclosureSealedPorted
Frequency response18-120 Hz24-160 Hz
Weight52.00kg / 114.4lbs17.73kg / 39lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)24-1/4" x 17-5/8" x 23-1/16"
616.0 x 448.0 x 585.0mm
16-7/16" x 16-1/16" x 19-1/16"
418.0 x 408.0 x 485.0mm
Woofer - 12.5 inchWoofer - 12.5 inch
Sonus faber Gravis VI
Woofer - 12 inch
Polk Monitor XT12

Woofer

Drivers drawn to scale and directly comparable. Cabinet outlines are indicative: full dimensions are not published for both. Hover a driver for its size.

The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Sonus faber Gravis VI and Polk Monitor XT12 have a totally different setup: the Sonus faber Gravis VI features 2 x 12.5-inch drivers whereas the Monitor XT12 features 1 x 12-inch drivers.

Frequency Response

Gravis VI has a frequency range of 18-120 Hz whereas Monitor XT12 has a frequency range of 24-160 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 18Hz, the Gravis VI can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Monitor XT12's min frequency of 24Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Sonus faber Gravis VI
Polk Monitor XT12
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Sonus faber Gravis VI
Polk Monitor XT12
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The Sonus faber Gravis VI has a Acoustic Suspension type cabinet. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs. On the other hand the Polk Monitor XT12 have Bass Reflex type enclosure. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Sonus faber Gravis VI's and Polk Monitor XT12's external dimensions. Sonus faber Gravis VI has external dimensions of 616.0 x 448.0 x 585.0mm (24-1/4 x 17-5/8 x 23-1/16inch) whereas Polk Monitor XT12 has external dimensions of 418.0 x 408.0 x 485.0mm (16-7/16inch x 16-1/16inch x 19-1/16inch).

Sonus faber Gravis VI is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 40mm wider, 198mm taller and 100mm deeper than Polk Monitor XT12.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTSonus faber Gravis VI front: 448 x 616 mm (17.6 x 24.3 in)Polk Monitor XT12 front: 408 x 418 mm (16.1 x 16.5 in)Sonus faber Gravis VI448 × 616 mmPolk Monitor XT12408 × 418 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTSonus faber Gravis VI footprint: 448 x 585 mm (17.6 x 23 in)Polk Monitor XT12 footprint: 408 x 485 mm (16.1 x 19.1 in)Sonus faber Gravis VI448 × 585 mmPolk Monitor XT12408 × 485 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

Sonus faber Gravis VI needs about 32% more floor or shelf area. Sonus faber Gravis VI is 100mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. Sonus faber Gravis VI is 198mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Sonus faber Gravis VI is approximately 2620.8cm2 / 406.2inch2 and base area of the Polk Monitor XT12 is approximately 1978.8cm2 / 306.7inch2. The Gravis VI requires 32% more surface area than the Monitor XT12 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Sonus faber Gravis VI weighs 52.00kg / 114.4lbs and the Polk Monitor XT12 weighs 17.73kg / 39lbs. This makes the Gravis VI 193% heavier than the Monitor XT12.

Here is a comparison of how Gravis VI and Monitor XT12's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Sonus faber Gravis VI
Polk Monitor XT12
Min
Average
Max

Reasons to choose Sonus faber Gravis VI over Polk Monitor XT12
Woofer Size 12.5 inches vs 12 inches Larger woofer
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 18 Hz vs 24 Hz Generates deeper bass
Reasons to choose Polk Monitor XT12 over Sonus faber Gravis VI
High Frequency Response 160 Hz vs 120 Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 418mm vs 616mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 1978cm2 vs 2620cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 399USD vs 6500USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTSonus faber Gravis VI front: 448 x 616 mm (17.6 x 24.3 in)Polk Monitor XT12 front: 408 x 418 mm (16.1 x 16.5 in)Sonus faber Gravis VI448 × 616 mmPolk Monitor XT12408 × 418 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTSonus faber Gravis VI footprint: 448 x 585 mm (17.6 x 23 in)Polk Monitor XT12 footprint: 408 x 485 mm (16.1 x 19.1 in)Sonus faber Gravis VI448 × 585 mmPolk Monitor XT12408 × 485 mm
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.

Sonus faber Gravis VI needs about 32% more floor area. Sonus faber Gravis VI stands 100mm further into the room. Sonus faber Gravis VI is 198mm taller.

Sonus faber Gravis VI vs Polk Monitor XT12 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Sonus faber Gravis VI Polk Monitor XT12
Brand Sonus faber Polk Audio
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 1700 watts 50 watts
Frequency Response 18-120 Hz 24-160 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 1700-watt RMS 50-watt RMS
Watts Peak (Max) 2400-watt RMS n/a
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 1
Woofer Size 12.5" 12"
Woofer Composition Honeycomb sandwich Bi-laminate paper
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Crossover Frequency Continuously adjustable n/a
Firing Direction n/a front
Physical Specs
Height 616.0mm (24.3") 418.0mm (16.5")
Width 448.0mm (17.6") 408.0mm (16.1")
Depth 585.0mm (23") 485.0mm (19.1")
Weight 52.00kg (114.4lbs) 17.73kg (39lbs)
Enclosure Acoustic Suspension Bass Reflex
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Other
Parts Warranty 3 Years
Labor Warranty 3 Years

Verdict

A sealed subwoofer against a ported one. That is the most consequential line on this page: it decides how the bass rolls off, how it behaves in a small room, and how much output you get for the size of the box.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass depthASonus faber Gravis VI goes deeper - 18Hz against 24Hz. Under 20Hz is felt more than heard - the bottom of a pipe organ and the bottom of a film mix.
Amplifier powerASonus faber Gravis VI has the bigger amplifier - 1700W against 50W RMS, about 15.3dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting.
Driver areaASonus faber Gravis VI moves more air: 2 x 12.5" against 12" is 2.17x the cone area, not the 1.47x the diameters suggest. More area means the same output with less excursion, and less distortion with it.
EnclosuredependsSonus faber Gravis VI is sealed - a sealed box rolls off gently and is usually the easier one to integrate in a small or awkward room; Polk Monitor XT12 is ported - a ported box gives more output low down for its size, at the cost of a steeper roll-off below tuning. Neither is better in the abstract; ported tends to suit films and sealed tends to suit music, and both generalisations have exceptions.
Cabinet sizedependsPolk Monitor XT12 is about 49% smaller by volume. In a subwoofer that is a real trade rather than a preference: box volume is how you get output low down without a bigger amplifier.
PriceBPolk Monitor XT12 costs less - $399 against $6,500, about 94% less.

A Sonus faber Gravis VI  B Polk Monitor XT12
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: Sonus faber Gravis VI measures better, Polk Monitor XT12 costs about 94% less. In a normal room, placement will make a bigger difference than the gap between these two. Films or music? If this is mainly a home cinema, Polk Monitor XT12 will hit harder for the money; if it is mainly for music in a normal-sized room, Sonus faber Gravis VI is usually the easier one to make sound right. Two small subwoofers beat one big one in most rooms - a pair evens out the room modes in a way no single box can, whatever its specs. At $399 each, two Polk Monitor XT12 cost about $798 against $6,500 for one of the other, which is worth a thought.

One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.


Latest Powered Subwoofers
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
16-inch Woofer | 14.5-175 Hz | 800 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
14-inch Woofer | 15-180 Hz | 500 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
12-inch Woofer | 17-160 Hz | 400 watts
DALI BASIK SUB
DALI BASIK SUB
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Bluesound PULSE SUB
6.5-inch Woofer | | 350 watts
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts
Revel Performa4 B140
Revel Performa4 B140
10-inch Woofer | 26-150 Hz | 750 watts
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
9-inch Woofer | 20-230 Hz | 1200 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 15
MartinLogan Grotto 15
15-inch Woofer | 20-120 Hz | 1000 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 12
MartinLogan Grotto 12
12-inch Woofer | 22-120 Hz | 1000 watts

This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction