SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Powered Subwoofers
  3. Sonus faber Gravis I vs Polk Monitor XT12
Sonus faber Gravis I vs Polk Audio Monitor XT12 Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Sonus faber Gravis I

Powered Subwoofer | 30-120 Hz

Sonus faber Gravis I
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Polk Monitor XT12

Powered Subwoofer | 24-160 Hz

Polk Monitor XT12
Check price atAmazon›
Sonus faber Gravis I Sonus faber Gravis I
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Monitor XT12 Polk Monitor XT12
Check price atAmazon›
Sonus faber Gravis I
See at AMAZON
Polk Monitor XT12
See at AMAZON

Sonus faber Gravis I vs Polk Monitor XT12 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Gravis I and Monitor XT12, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Sonus faber and Polk Audio. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Sonus faber Gravis I and Polk Monitor XT12 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsSonus faber Gravis IPolk Monitor XT12
BrandSonus faber
Italy · founded 1983
Polk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Driver8" Treated Paper12" Bi-laminate paper
Amplifier150 watts RMS50 watts RMS
EnclosureSealedPorted
Frequency response30-120 Hz24-160 Hz
Weight14.55kg / 32lbs17.73kg / 39lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)13-1/4" x 11-1/4" x 13-3/8"
337.0 x 286.0 x 340.0mm
16-7/16" x 16-1/16" x 19-1/16"
418.0 x 408.0 x 485.0mm
Woofer - 8 inch
Sonus faber Gravis I
Woofer - 12 inch
Polk Monitor XT12

Woofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Both Sonus faber Gravis Iand Polk Monitor XT12 have a single woofer setup however the Sonus faber Gravis I's woofer is 8-inch whereas the Polk Monitor XT12 features a 12-inch woofer.

Frequency Response

Gravis I has a frequency range of 30-120 Hz whereas Monitor XT12 has a frequency range of 24-160 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 24Hz, the Monitor XT12 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Gravis I's min frequency of 30Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Sonus faber Gravis I
Polk Monitor XT12
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Sonus faber Gravis I
Polk Monitor XT12
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The Sonus faber Gravis I has a Acoustic Suspension type cabinet. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs. On the other hand the Polk Monitor XT12 have Bass Reflex type enclosure. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Sonus faber Gravis I's and Polk Monitor XT12's external dimensions. Sonus faber Gravis I has external dimensions of 337.0 x 286.0 x 340.0mm (13-1/4inch x 11-1/4inch x 13-3/8inch) whereas Polk Monitor XT12 has external dimensions of 418.0 x 408.0 x 485.0mm (16-7/16inch x 16-1/16inch x 19-1/16inch).

Polk Monitor XT12 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 122mm wider, 81mm taller and 145mm deeper than Sonus faber Gravis I.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Sonus faber Gravis I is approximately 972.4cm2 / 150.7inch2 and base area of the Polk Monitor XT12 is approximately 1978.8cm2 / 306.7inch2. The Gravis I requires 51% less surface area than the Monitor XT12 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Sonus faber Gravis I weighs 14.55kg / 32lbs and the Polk Monitor XT12 weighs 17.73kg / 39lbs. This makes the Monitor XT12 22% heavier than the Gravis I.

Here is a comparison of how Gravis I and Monitor XT12's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Sonus faber Gravis I
Polk Monitor XT12
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Sonus faber Gravis I?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Gravis I:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • 6-feet AC power cord
  • 33-feet Speakon cable
  • Owners Manual
  • Environmental Information

What's in the Box of Polk Monitor XT12?

Here are the items that come with the Monitor XT12:
  • Black powered subwoofer
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • Grille
  • Owners Manual
  • Online registration card


Reasons to choose Sonus faber Gravis I over Polk Monitor XT12
Height 337mm vs 418mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 972cm2 vs 1978cm2 Takes less floor space
Reasons to choose Polk Monitor XT12 over Sonus faber Gravis I
Woofer Size 12 inches vs 8 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 24 Hz vs 30 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 160 Hz vs 120 Hz Generates higher frequency
Price per pair* 399USD vs 999USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTSonus faber Gravis I front: 286 x 337 mm (11.3 x 13.3 in)Polk Monitor XT12 front: 408 x 418 mm (16.1 x 16.5 in)Sonus faber Gravis I286 × 337 mmPolk Monitor XT12408 × 418 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTSonus faber Gravis I footprint: 286 x 340 mm (11.3 x 13.4 in)Polk Monitor XT12 footprint: 408 x 485 mm (16.1 x 19.1 in)Sonus faber Gravis I286 × 340 mmPolk Monitor XT12408 × 485 mm
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.

Polk Monitor XT12 needs about 103% more floor area. Polk Monitor XT12 stands 145mm further into the room. Polk Monitor XT12 is 81mm taller.

Sonus faber Gravis I vs Polk Monitor XT12 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Sonus faber Gravis I Polk Monitor XT12
Brand Sonus faber Polk Audio
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 150 watts 50 watts
Frequency Response 30-120 Hz 24-160 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 150-watt RMS 50-watt RMS
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 8" 12"
Woofer Composition Treated Paper Bi-laminate paper
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction bottom front
Physical Specs
Height 337.0mm (13.3") 418.0mm (16.5")
Width 286.0mm (11.3") 408.0mm (16.1")
Depth 340.0mm (13.4") 485.0mm (19.1")
Weight 14.55kg (32lbs) 17.73kg (39lbs)
Enclosure Acoustic Suspension Bass Reflex
Available Colors Piano Black,Matte White n/a
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Other
Parts Warranty 2 Yr/3 Yr registered 3 Years
Labor Warranty 2 Yr/3 Yr registered 3 Years

Verdict

A sealed subwoofer against a ported one. That is the most consequential line on this page: it decides how the bass rolls off, how it behaves in a small room, and how much output you get for the size of the box.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass depthBPolk Monitor XT12 goes deeper - 24Hz against 30Hz. That gap covers the lowest notes of a five-string bass and a concert bass drum.
Amplifier powerASonus faber Gravis I has the bigger amplifier - 150W against 50W RMS, about 4.8dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting.
Driver areaBPolk Monitor XT12 moves more air: 12" against 8" is 2.25x the cone area, not the 1.5x the diameters suggest. More area means the same output with less excursion, and less distortion with it.
EnclosuredependsSonus faber Gravis I is sealed - a sealed box rolls off gently and is usually the easier one to integrate in a small or awkward room; Polk Monitor XT12 is ported - a ported box gives more output low down for its size, at the cost of a steeper roll-off below tuning. Neither is better in the abstract; ported tends to suit films and sealed tends to suit music, and both generalisations have exceptions.
Driver placementdependsSonus faber Gravis I fires down and Polk Monitor XT12 fires front. A down-firing driver is more forgiving of a grille-less look and of a hard floor; a front-firing one is the safer choice on a thick carpet or a suspended timber floor.
Cabinet sizedependsSonus faber Gravis I is about 60% smaller by volume. In a subwoofer that is a real trade rather than a preference: box volume is how you get output low down without a bigger amplifier.
WarrantyBPolk Monitor XT12 carries 3 years on parts against 2 years. A subwoofer amplifier works harder than anything else in the system, so this is not a throwaway line.
PriceBPolk Monitor XT12 costs less - $399 against $999, about 60% less.

A Sonus faber Gravis I  B Polk Monitor XT12
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Polk Monitor XT12 is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take Sonus faber Gravis I if one of the "depends" rows describes your room. Films or music? If this is mainly a home cinema, Polk Monitor XT12 will hit harder for the money; if it is mainly for music in a normal-sized room, Sonus faber Gravis I is usually the easier one to make sound right. Two small subwoofers beat one big one in most rooms - a pair evens out the room modes in a way no single box can, whatever its specs. At $399 each, two Polk Monitor XT12 cost about $798 against $999 for one of the other, which is worth a thought.

One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.


Latest Powered Subwoofers
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
16-inch Woofer | 14.5-175 Hz | 800 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
14-inch Woofer | 15-180 Hz | 500 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
12-inch Woofer | 17-160 Hz | 400 watts
DALI BASIK SUB
DALI BASIK SUB
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Bluesound PULSE SUB
6.5-inch Woofer | | 350 watts
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts
Revel Performa4 B140
Revel Performa4 B140
10-inch Woofer | 26-150 Hz | 750 watts
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
9-inch Woofer | 20-230 Hz | 1200 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 15
MartinLogan Grotto 15
15-inch Woofer | 20-120 Hz | 1000 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 12
MartinLogan Grotto 12
12-inch Woofer | 22-120 Hz | 1000 watts

This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction