SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Powered Subwoofers
  3. SVS PC-2000 vs ELAC Varro PS350-BK
SVS PC-2000 vs ELAC Varro PS350-BK Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

SVS PC-2000

Powered Subwoofer | 16-260 Hz

SVS PC-2000
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
ELAC Varro PS350-BK

Powered Subwoofer | 24-150 Hz

ELAC Varro PS350-BK
Check price atAmazon›
SVS PC-2000 SVS PC-2000
Check price atAmazon›
ELAC Varro PS350-BK ELAC Varro PS350-BK
Check price atAmazon›
SVS PC-2000
See at AMAZON
ELAC Varro PS350-BK
See at AMAZON

SVS PC-2000 vs ELAC Varro PS350-BK Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing PC-2000 and Varro PS350-BK, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from SVS and ELAC. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of SVS PC-2000 and ELAC Varro PS350-BK first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsSVS PC-2000ELAC Varro PS350-BK
Driver12" Aluminum12" Treated paper
Amplifier500 watts RMS350 watts RMS
EnclosurePortedPorted
Frequency response16-260 Hz24-150 Hz
App control—Yes
Weight22.70kg / 49.9lbs21.86kg / 48.1lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)34-5/16" x 16-5/8" x 16-5/8"
872.0 x 422.0 x 422.0mm
17-1/4" x 16-7/16" x 16-1/2"
439.0 x 418.0 x 420.0mm

The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.


**This post contains affiliate links, and we will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through our links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.SVS PC-2000and ELAC Varro PS350-BK have the same driver set up: Both subwoofers have 1 x 12" drivers.

Frequency Response

PC-2000 has a frequency range of 16-260 Hz whereas Varro PS350-BK has a frequency range of 24-150 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 16Hz, the PC-2000 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Varro PS350-BK's min frequency of 24Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

SVS PC-2000
ELAC Varro PS350-BK
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

SVS PC-2000
ELAC Varro PS350-BK
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

Both SVS PC-2000 and ELAC Varro PS350-BK have Bass Reflex type cabinets. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare SVS PC-2000's and ELAC Varro PS350-BK's external dimensions. SVS PC-2000 has external dimensions of 872.0 x 422.0 x 422.0mm (34-5/16 x 16-5/8 x 16-5/8inch) whereas ELAC Varro PS350-BK has external dimensions of 439.0 x 418.0 x 420.0mm (17-1/4inch x 16-7/16inch x 16-1/2inch).

SVS PC-2000 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 4mm wider, 433mm taller and 2mm deeper than ELAC Varro PS350-BK.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the SVS PC-2000 is approximately 1780.8cm2 / 276.0inch2 and base area of the ELAC Varro PS350-BK is approximately 1755.6cm2 / 272.1inch2. The PC-2000 requires 1% more surface area than the Varro PS350-BK which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The SVS PC-2000 weighs 22.70kg / 49.9lbs and the ELAC Varro PS350-BK weighs 21.86kg / 48.1lbs. This makes the PC-2000 4% heavier than the Varro PS350-BK.

Here is a comparison of how PC-2000 and Varro PS350-BK's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
SVS PC-2000
ELAC Varro PS350-BK
Min
Average
Max

Reasons to choose SVS PC-2000 over ELAC Varro PS350-BK
Low Frequency Response 16 Hz vs 24 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 260k Hz vs 150k Hz Generates higher frequency
Price per pair* 750USD vs 799USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Reasons to choose ELAC Varro PS350-BK over SVS PC-2000
App-Based Control iOS,Android vs None Control the speaker via an app
Height 439mm vs 872mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 1755cm2 vs 1780cm2 Takes less floor space

SVS PC-2000 vs ELAC Varro PS350-BK Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General SVS PC-2000 ELAC Varro PS350-BK
Brand SVS ELAC
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 500 watts 350 watts
Frequency Response 16-260 Hz 24-150 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 500-watt RMS 350-watt RMS
Watts Peak (Max) 1100-watt RMS 700-watt RMS
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 12" 12"
Woofer Composition Aluminum Treated paper
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction rear bottom
Physical Specs
Height 872.0mm (34.3") 439.0mm (17.3")
Width 422.0mm (16.6") 418.0mm (16.5")
Depth 422.0mm (16.6") 420.0mm (16.5")
Weight 22.70kg (49.9lbs) 21.86kg (48.1lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish n/a MDF
Available Colors n/a Black
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
USB Port n/a USB-A port for firmware updates
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 1 year
Labor Warranty 5 Years 1 year

Latest Powered Subwoofers
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Bluesound PULSE SUB
6.5-inch Woofer | | 350 watts
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts
Revel Performa4 B140
Revel Performa4 B140
10-inch Woofer | 26-150 Hz | 750 watts
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
9-inch Woofer | 20-230 Hz | 1200 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 15
MartinLogan Grotto 15
15-inch Woofer | 20-120 Hz | 1000 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 12
MartinLogan Grotto 12
12-inch Woofer | 22-120 Hz | 1000 watts
MartinLogan Depth 215
MartinLogan Depth 215
15-inch Woofer | 18-120 Hz | 2200 watts
MartinLogan Depth 212
MartinLogan Depth 212
12-inch Woofer | 18-120 Hz | 1100 watts
DALI Sub V-16 F
DALI Sub V-16 F
16-inch Woofer | 19-200 Hz | 1500 watts
Kanto SUB6 v2
Kanto SUB6 v2
6-inch Woofer | 40-175 Hz | 100 watts

Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction