SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Genelec GoldenEar Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Polk Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus Faber Sony SVS Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers
      By Brand
      Advance Paris Anthem Arcam AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Peachtree Primare PS Audio Rega Roksan Rotel Sonos Sony SVS TEAC Technics WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • AMP MATCHER
  • BLOG
Q Acoustics 3060S vs SVS SB-1000 Pro Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Q Acoustics 3060S

Powered Subwoofer | 35-250 Hz

Q Acoustics 3060S
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
SVS SB-1000 Pro

Powered Subwoofer | 20-270 Hz

SVS SB-1000 Pro
CHECK PRICE
Q Acoustics 3060S Q Acoustics 3060S
See at AMAZON
SVS SB-1000 Pro SVS SB-1000 Pro
See at AMAZON
Q Acoustics 3060S
See at AMAZON
SVS SB-1000 Pro
See at AMAZON
Q Acoustics 3060S vs SVS SB-1000 Pro Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing 3060S and SB-1000 Pro, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Q Acoustics and SVS. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Q Acoustics 3060S and SVS SB-1000 Pro first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Q Acoustics 3060S Key Specs

  • 8" Paper composite Woofer
  • 35-250 Hz Frequency Response
  • 150 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:8.50kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 12-3/4" x 18-7/8" x 6-1/8" ( 324.0 x 480.0 x 155.0mm )

SVS SB-1000 Pro Key Specs

  • 12" Fiber-composite Woofer
  • 20-270 Hz Frequency Response
  • 325 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • App Control Feature
  • Weight:11.82kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 13-1/2" x 13" x 15-13/16" ( 343.0 x 331.0 x 402.0mm )

In the following sections, we will get into details in order to better understand how the Q Acoustics 3060S and SVS SB-1000 Pro compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these subwoofers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Both Q Acoustics 3060Sand SVS SB-1000 Pro have a single woofer setup however the Q Acoustics 3060S's woofer is 8-inch whereas the SVS SB-1000 Pro features a 12-inch woofer.

Frequency Response

3060S has a frequency range of 35-250 Hz whereas SB-1000 Pro has a frequency range of 20-270 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 20Hz, the SB-1000 Pro can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the 3060S's min frequency of 35Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Q Acoustics 3060S
SVS SB-1000 Pro
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Q Acoustics 3060S
SVS SB-1000 Pro
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The Q Acoustics 3060S has a Infinite Baffle type cabinet. On the other hand the SVS SB-1000 Pro have Acoustic Suspension type enclosure. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs.

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Q Acoustics 3060S's and SVS SB-1000 Pro's external dimensions. Q Acoustics 3060S has external dimensions of 324.0 x 480.0 x 155.0mm ( 12-3/4 x 18-7/8 x 6-1/8inch) whereas SVS SB-1000 Pro has external dimensions of 343.0 x 331.0 x 402.0mm ( 13-1/2inch x 13inch x 15-13/16inch ) .

Q Acoustics 3060S is 19mm shorter and 247mm less deeper than SVS SB-1000 Pro but it is also 149mm wider.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Q Acoustics 3060S is approximately 744.0cm2 / 115.3inch2 and base area of the SVS SB-1000 Pro is approximately 1330.6cm2 / 206.2inch2. The 3060S requires 44% less surface area than the SB-1000 Pro which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Q Acoustics 3060S weighs 8.50kg / 18.7lbs and the SVS SB-1000 Pro weighs 11.82kg / 26lbs. This makes the SB-1000 Pro 39% heavier than the 3060S.

Here is a comparison of how 3060S and SB-1000 Pro's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Q Acoustics 3060S
SVS SB-1000 Pro
Min
Average
Max

Reasons to choose Q Acoustics 3060S over SVS SB-1000 Pro
Height 324mm vs 343mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 744cm2 vs 1330cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 299USD vs 600USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Reasons to choose SVS SB-1000 Pro over Q Acoustics 3060S
Woofer Size 12 inches vs 8 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 20 Hz vs 35 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 270k Hz vs 250k Hz Generates higher frequency
App-Based Control iOS,Android vs None Control the speaker via an app
Q Acoustics 3060S vs SVS SB-1000 Pro Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Q Acoustics 3060S SVS SB-1000 Pro
Brand Q Acoustics SVS
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 150 watts 325 watts
Frequency Response 35-250 Hz 20-270 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 150-watt RMS 325-watt RMS
Watts Peak (Max) n/a 820-watt RMS
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 8" 12"
Woofer Composition Paper composite Fiber-composite
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction n/a front
Physical Specs
Height 324.0mm (12.8") 343.0mm (13.5")
Width 480.0mm (18.9") 331.0mm (13")
Depth 155.0mm (6.1") 402.0mm (15.8")
Weight 8.50kg (18.7lbs) 11.82kg (26lbs)
Enclosure Infinite Baffle Acoustic Suspension
Available Colors n/a Black,White
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

Latest Powered Subwoofers
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts
Emotiva Airmotiv XS12e
Emotiva Airmotiv XS12e
12-inch Woofer | 28-200 Hz | 300 watts
DALI Sub V-16 F
DALI Sub V-16 F
16-inch Woofer | 19-200 Hz | 1500 watts
DALI Sub P-10 DSS
DALI Sub P-10 DSS
10-inch Woofer | 24-250 Hz | 300 watts
DALI Sub K-14 F
DALI Sub K-14 F
14-inch Woofer | 29-160 Hz | 450 watts
DALI Sub E-9 F
DALI Sub E-9 F
9-inch Woofer | 37-200 Hz | 170 watts
DALI Sub E-12 F
DALI Sub E-12 F
12-inch Woofer | 28-190 Hz | 170 watts
DALI Sub C-8 D
DALI Sub C-8 D
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Wilson Audio Subsonic
Wilson Audio Subsonic
12-inch Woofer | 10-150 Hz | watts
Triangle Thetis 340
Triangle Thetis 340
10-inch Woofer | 25-120 Hz | 250 watts

Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction