SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Powered Subwoofers
  3. Polk Monitor XT12 vs Jamo S 810 SUB
Polk Audio Monitor XT12 vs Jamo S 810 SUB Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Polk Monitor XT12

Powered Subwoofer | 24-160 Hz

Polk Monitor XT12
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Jamo S 810 SUB

Powered Subwoofer | 36-180 Hz

Jamo S 810 SUB
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Monitor XT12 Polk Monitor XT12
Check price atAmazon›
Jamo S 810 SUB Jamo S 810 SUB
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Monitor XT12
See at AMAZON
Jamo S 810 SUB
See at AMAZON

Polk Monitor XT12 vs Jamo S 810 SUB Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Monitor XT12 and S 810 SUB, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Polk Audio and Jamo. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Polk Monitor XT12 and Jamo S 810 SUB first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsPolk Monitor XT12Jamo S 810 SUB
BrandPolk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Jamo
Denmark · founded 1966
Driver12" Bi-laminate paper10" Polyfiber
Amplifier50 watts RMS75 watts RMS
EnclosurePortedPorted
Frequency response24-160 Hz36-180 Hz
Weight17.73kg / 39lbs11.82kg / 26lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)16-7/16" x 16-1/16" x 19-1/16"
418.0 x 408.0 x 485.0mm
20" x 8-15/16" x 15-15/16"
508.0 x 228.0 x 405.0mm
Woofer - 12 inch
Polk Monitor XT12
Woofer - 10 inch
Jamo S 810 SUB

Woofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Both Polk Monitor XT12and Jamo S 810 SUB have a single woofer setup however the Polk Monitor XT12's woofer is 12-inch whereas the Jamo S 810 SUB features a 10-inch woofer.

Frequency Response

Monitor XT12 has a frequency range of 24-160 Hz whereas S 810 SUB has a frequency range of 36-180 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 24Hz, the Monitor XT12 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the S 810 SUB's min frequency of 36Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Polk Monitor XT12
Jamo S 810 SUB
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Polk Monitor XT12
Jamo S 810 SUB
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

Both Polk Monitor XT12 and Jamo S 810 SUB have Bass Reflex type cabinets. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Polk Monitor XT12's and Jamo S 810 SUB's external dimensions. Polk Monitor XT12 has external dimensions of 418.0 x 408.0 x 485.0mm (16-7/16inch x 16-1/16inch x 19-1/16inch) whereas Jamo S 810 SUB has external dimensions of 508.0 x 228.0 x 405.0mm (20 x 8-15/16 x 15-15/16inch).

Jamo S 810 SUB is 180mm narrower and 80mm less deeper than Polk Monitor XT12 but it is also 90mm taller.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Polk Monitor XT12 and Jamo S 810 SUB in scale.

Polk Monitor XT12 vs Jamo S 810 SUB Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Polk Monitor XT12 and Jamo S 810 SUB Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Polk Monitor XT12 is approximately 1978.8cm2 / 306.7inch2 and base area of the Jamo S 810 SUB is approximately 923.4cm2 / 143.1inch2. The Monitor XT12 requires 114% more surface area than the S 810 SUB which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Polk Monitor XT12 weighs 17.73kg / 39lbs and the Jamo S 810 SUB weighs 11.82kg / 26lbs. This makes the Monitor XT12 50% heavier than the S 810 SUB.

Here is a comparison of how Monitor XT12 and S 810 SUB's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Polk Monitor XT12
Jamo S 810 SUB
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Polk Monitor XT12?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Monitor XT12:
  • Black powered subwoofer
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • Grille
  • Owners Manual
  • Online registration card

What's in the Box of Jamo S 810 SUB?

Here are the items that come with the S 810 SUB:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • Grille
  • 5-feet AC power cord
  • 6.5-feet Mono-RCA cable
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose Polk Monitor XT12 over Jamo S 810 SUB
Woofer Size 12 inches vs 10 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 24 Hz vs 36 Hz Generates deeper bass
Height 418mm vs 508mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Reasons to choose Jamo S 810 SUB over Polk Monitor XT12
High Frequency Response 180 Hz vs 160 Hz Generates higher frequency
Base Surface Area 923cm2 vs 1978cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 199USD vs 399USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTPolk Monitor XT12 front: 408 x 418 mm (16.1 x 16.5 in)Jamo S 810 SUB front: 228 x 508 mm (9 x 20 in)Polk Monitor XT12408 × 418 mmJamo S 810 SUB228 × 508 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTPolk Monitor XT12 footprint: 408 x 485 mm (16.1 x 19.1 in)Jamo S 810 SUB footprint: 228 x 405 mm (9 x 15.9 in)Polk Monitor XT12408 × 485 mmJamo S 810 SUB228 × 405 mm
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.

Polk Monitor XT12 needs about 114% more floor area. Polk Monitor XT12 stands 80mm further into the room. Jamo S 810 SUB is 90mm taller.

Polk Monitor XT12 vs Jamo S 810 SUB Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Polk Monitor XT12 Jamo S 810 SUB
Brand Polk Audio Jamo
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 50 watts 75 watts
Frequency Response 24-160 Hz 36-180 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 50-watt RMS 75-watt RMS
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 12" 10"
Woofer Composition Bi-laminate paper Polyfiber
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction front Side
Physical Specs
Height 418.0mm (16.5") 508.0mm (20")
Width 408.0mm (16.1") 228.0mm (9")
Depth 485.0mm (19.1") 405.0mm (15.9")
Weight 17.73kg (39lbs) 11.82kg (26lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Other
Parts Warranty 3 Years 2 Years
Labor Warranty 3 Years 2 Years

Verdict

Different price classes - Polk Monitor XT12 costs roughly 2x what Jamo S 810 SUB does. Before paying it, read the note below about two smaller subwoofers.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass depthAPolk Monitor XT12 goes deeper - 24Hz against 36Hz. That gap covers the lowest notes of a five-string bass and a concert bass drum.
Amplifier powerBJamo S 810 SUB has the bigger amplifier - 75W against 50W RMS, about 1.8dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting.
Driver areaAPolk Monitor XT12 moves more air: 12" against 10" is 1.44x the cone area, not the 1.2x the diameters suggest. More area means the same output with less excursion, and less distortion with it.
Enclosureevenly matchedBoth are ported designs, so they roll off in much the same way.
Speaker-level inputsAPolk Monitor XT12 takes a speaker-level connection as well as line level. That is what lets it work with an integrated amplifier or a vintage receiver that has no subwoofer output at all.
Driver placementdependsPolk Monitor XT12 fires front and Jamo S 810 SUB fires side. A down-firing driver is more forgiving of a grille-less look and of a hard floor; a front-firing one is the safer choice on a thick carpet or a suspended timber floor.
Cabinet sizedependsJamo S 810 SUB is about 43% smaller by volume. In a subwoofer that is a real trade rather than a preference: box volume is how you get output low down without a bigger amplifier.
WarrantyAPolk Monitor XT12 carries 3 years on parts against 2 years. A subwoofer amplifier works harder than anything else in the system, so this is not a throwaway line.
PriceBJamo S 810 SUB costs less - $199 against $399, about 50% less.

A Polk Monitor XT12  B Jamo S 810 SUB
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: Polk Monitor XT12 measures better, Jamo S 810 SUB costs about 50% less. In a normal room, placement will make a bigger difference than the gap between these two. Check your amplifier first: if it has no subwoofer or preamp output, Polk Monitor XT12 is the only one of these two you can connect at all. Two small subwoofers beat one big one in most rooms - a pair evens out the room modes in a way no single box can, whatever its specs. At $199 each, two Jamo S 810 SUB cost about $398 against $399 for one of the other, which is worth a thought.

One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.


Latest Powered Subwoofers
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
16-inch Woofer | 14.5-175 Hz | 800 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
14-inch Woofer | 15-180 Hz | 500 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
12-inch Woofer | 17-160 Hz | 400 watts
DALI BASIK SUB
DALI BASIK SUB
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Bluesound PULSE SUB
6.5-inch Woofer | | 350 watts
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts
Revel Performa4 B140
Revel Performa4 B140
10-inch Woofer | 26-150 Hz | 750 watts
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
9-inch Woofer | 20-230 Hz | 1200 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 15
MartinLogan Grotto 15
15-inch Woofer | 20-120 Hz | 1000 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 12
MartinLogan Grotto 12
12-inch Woofer | 22-120 Hz | 1000 watts

This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction