SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Powered Subwoofers
  3. Polk Monitor XT12 vs GoldenEar ForceField 30
Polk Audio Monitor XT12 vs GoldenEar ForceField 30 Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Polk Monitor XT12

Powered Subwoofer | 24-160 Hz

Polk Monitor XT12
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
GoldenEar ForceField 30

Powered Subwoofer | 18-250 Hz

GoldenEar ForceField 30
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Monitor XT12 Polk Monitor XT12
Check price atAmazon›
GoldenEar ForceField 30 GoldenEar ForceField...
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Monitor XT12
See at AMAZON
GoldenEar ForceField...
See at AMAZON

Polk Monitor XT12 vs GoldenEar ForceField 30 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Monitor XT12 and ForceField 30, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Polk Audio and GoldenEar. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Polk Monitor XT12 and GoldenEar ForceField 30 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsPolk Monitor XT12GoldenEar ForceField 30
BrandPolk Audio
United States · founded 1972
GoldenEar
United States · founded 2010
Driver12" Bi-laminate paper8" Polypropylene
Amplifier50 watts RMS1000 watts RMS
EnclosurePortedPassive Radiator
Frequency response24-160 Hz18-250 Hz
Weight17.73kg / 39lbs14.32kg / 31.5lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)16-7/16" x 16-1/16" x 19-1/16"
418.0 x 408.0 x 485.0mm
12-3/4" x 11-7/16" x 16-9/16"
324.0 x 291.0 x 421.0mm
Woofer - 12 inch
Polk Monitor XT12
Woofer - 8 inch
GoldenEar ForceField 30

Woofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Both Polk Monitor XT12and GoldenEar ForceField 30 have a single woofer setup however the Polk Monitor XT12's woofer is 12-inch whereas the GoldenEar ForceField 30 features a 8-inch woofer.

Frequency Response

Monitor XT12 has a frequency range of 24-160 Hz whereas ForceField 30 has a frequency range of 18-250 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 18Hz, the ForceField 30 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Monitor XT12's min frequency of 24Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Polk Monitor XT12
GoldenEar ForceField 30
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Polk Monitor XT12
GoldenEar ForceField 30
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The Polk Monitor XT12 has a Bass Reflex type cabinet. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs. On the other hand the GoldenEar ForceField 30 have Passive Radiator type enclosure. Passive Radiator type subwoofers sports a non-powered cone that moves in response to the main woofer to move air out in order to generate stronger bass in a smaller body compared to ported or sealed designs.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Polk Monitor XT12's and GoldenEar ForceField 30's external dimensions. Polk Monitor XT12 has external dimensions of 418.0 x 408.0 x 485.0mm (16-7/16inch x 16-1/16inch x 19-1/16inch) whereas GoldenEar ForceField 30 has external dimensions of 324.0 x 291.0 x 421.0mm (12-3/4inch x 11-7/16inch x 16-9/16inch).

Polk Monitor XT12 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 117mm wider, 94mm taller and 64mm deeper than GoldenEar ForceField 30.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Polk Monitor XT12 is approximately 1978.8cm2 / 306.7inch2 and base area of the GoldenEar ForceField 30 is approximately 1225.1cm2 / 189.9inch2. The Monitor XT12 requires 62% more surface area than the ForceField 30 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Polk Monitor XT12 weighs 17.73kg / 39lbs and the GoldenEar ForceField 30 weighs 14.32kg / 31.5lbs. This makes the Monitor XT12 24% heavier than the ForceField 30.

Here is a comparison of how Monitor XT12 and ForceField 30's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Polk Monitor XT12
GoldenEar ForceField 30
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Polk Monitor XT12?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Monitor XT12:
  • Black powered subwoofer
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • Grille
  • Owners Manual
  • Online registration card

What's in the Box of GoldenEar ForceField 30?

Here are the items that come with the ForceField 30:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • 10-feet AC power cord
  • Quick Start Guide
  • Owners Manual


Reasons to choose Polk Monitor XT12 over GoldenEar ForceField 30
Woofer Size 12 inches vs 8 inches Larger woofer
Price per pair* 399USD vs 899USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Reasons to choose GoldenEar ForceField 30 over Polk Monitor XT12
Low Frequency Response 18 Hz vs 24 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 250 Hz vs 160 Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 324mm vs 418mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 1225cm2 vs 1978cm2 Takes less floor space

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTPolk Monitor XT12 front: 408 x 418 mm (16.1 x 16.5 in)GoldenEar ForceField 30 front: 291 x 324 mm (11.5 x 12.8 in)Polk Monitor XT12408 × 418 mmGoldenEar ForceField 30291 × 324 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTPolk Monitor XT12 footprint: 408 x 485 mm (16.1 x 19.1 in)GoldenEar ForceField 30 footprint: 291 x 421 mm (11.5 x 16.6 in)Polk Monitor XT12408 × 485 mmGoldenEar ForceField 30291 × 421 mm
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.

Polk Monitor XT12 needs about 62% more floor area. Polk Monitor XT12 stands 64mm further into the room. Polk Monitor XT12 is 94mm taller.

Polk Monitor XT12 vs GoldenEar ForceField 30 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Polk Monitor XT12 GoldenEar ForceField 30
Brand Polk Audio GoldenEar
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 50 watts 1000 watts
Frequency Response 24-160 Hz 18-250 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 50-watt RMS 1000-watt RMS
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 12" 8"
Woofer Composition Bi-laminate paper Polypropylene
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction front front and bottom
Physical Specs
Height 418.0mm (16.5") 324.0mm (12.8")
Width 408.0mm (16.1") 291.0mm (11.5")
Depth 485.0mm (19.1") 421.0mm (16.6")
Weight 17.73kg (39lbs) 14.32kg (31.5lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Passive Radiator
Grille Yes n/a
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Other
Parts Warranty 3 Years 3 Years
Labor Warranty 3 Years 3 Years

Verdict

A ported subwoofer against a passive radiator one. That is the most consequential line on this page: it decides how the bass rolls off, how it behaves in a small room, and how much output you get for the size of the box.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass depthBGoldenEar ForceField 30 goes deeper - 18Hz against 24Hz. Under 20Hz is felt more than heard - the bottom of a pipe organ and the bottom of a film mix.
Amplifier powerBGoldenEar ForceField 30 has the bigger amplifier - 1000W against 50W RMS, about 13dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting.
Driver areaAPolk Monitor XT12 moves more air: 12" against 8" is 2.25x the cone area, not the 1.5x the diameters suggest. More area means the same output with less excursion, and less distortion with it.
EnclosuredependsPolk Monitor XT12 is ported - a ported box gives more output low down for its size, at the cost of a steeper roll-off below tuning; GoldenEar ForceField 30 is passive radiator - a passive radiator behaves like a port without the pipe noise, and suits a slim cabinet. Neither is better in the abstract; ported tends to suit films and sealed tends to suit music, and both generalisations have exceptions.
Speaker-level inputsAPolk Monitor XT12 takes a speaker-level connection as well as line level. That is what lets it work with an integrated amplifier or a vintage receiver that has no subwoofer output at all.
Phase controlAPolk Monitor XT12 has a phase control. Without one, the only way to fix a cancellation at the crossover is to move the box.
Driver placementdependsPolk Monitor XT12 fires front and GoldenEar ForceField 30 fires front/down. A down-firing driver is more forgiving of a grille-less look and of a hard floor; a front-firing one is the safer choice on a thick carpet or a suspended timber floor.
Cabinet sizedependsGoldenEar ForceField 30 is about 52% smaller by volume. In a subwoofer that is a real trade rather than a preference: box volume is how you get output low down without a bigger amplifier.
PriceAPolk Monitor XT12 costs less - $399 against $899, about 56% less.

A Polk Monitor XT12  B GoldenEar ForceField 30
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Polk Monitor XT12 has the edge on paper, though not by much. The "depends" rows are more likely to decide this than the score is. Check your amplifier first: if it has no subwoofer or preamp output, Polk Monitor XT12 is the only one of these two you can connect at all. Two small subwoofers beat one big one in most rooms - a pair evens out the room modes in a way no single box can, whatever its specs. At $399 each, two Polk Monitor XT12 cost about $798 against $899 for one of the other, which is worth a thought.

One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.


Latest Powered Subwoofers
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
16-inch Woofer | 14.5-175 Hz | 800 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
14-inch Woofer | 15-180 Hz | 500 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
12-inch Woofer | 17-160 Hz | 400 watts
DALI BASIK SUB
DALI BASIK SUB
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Bluesound PULSE SUB
6.5-inch Woofer | | 350 watts
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts
Revel Performa4 B140
Revel Performa4 B140
10-inch Woofer | 26-150 Hz | 750 watts
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
9-inch Woofer | 20-230 Hz | 1200 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 15
MartinLogan Grotto 15
15-inch Woofer | 20-120 Hz | 1000 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 12
MartinLogan Grotto 12
12-inch Woofer | 22-120 Hz | 1000 watts

This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction