SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Powered Subwoofers
  3. Polk Monitor XT12 vs B&W DB3D
Polk Audio Monitor XT12 vs Bowers Wilkins & Wilkins DB3D Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Polk Monitor XT12

Powered Subwoofer | 24-160 Hz

Polk Monitor XT12
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
B&W DB3D

Powered Subwoofer | 10-350Hz

Bowers & Wilkins DB3D
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Monitor XT12 Polk Monitor XT12
Check price atAmazon›
B&W DB3D B&W DB3D
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Monitor XT12
See at AMAZON
B&W DB3D
See at AMAZON

Polk Monitor XT12 vs B&W DB3D Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Monitor XT12 and DB3D, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Polk Audio and Bowers Wilkins. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Polk Monitor XT12 and B&W DB3D first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsPolk Monitor XT12B&W DB3D
BrandPolk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Bowers Wilkins
United Kingdom · founded 1966
Driver12" Bi-laminate paper2 x 8"
Amplifier50 watts RMS1000 watts RMS
EnclosurePortedSealed
Frequency response24-160 Hz10-350Hz
App control—Yes
Weight17.73kg / 39lbs25.05kg / 55.1lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)16-7/16" x 16-1/16" x 19-1/16"
418.0 x 408.0 x 485.0mm
14-1/2" x 13-7/16" x 13-11/16"
368.3 x 341.3 x 347.7mm
Woofer - 12 inch
Polk Monitor XT12
Woofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inch
B&W DB3D

Woofer

Drivers drawn to scale and directly comparable. Cabinet outlines are indicative: full dimensions are not published for both. Hover a driver for its size.

The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Polk Monitor XT12 and B&W DB3D have a totally different setup: the Polk Monitor XT12 features 1 x 12-inch drivers whereas the DB3D features 2 x 8-inch drivers.

Frequency Response

Monitor XT12 has a frequency range of 24-160 Hz whereas DB3D has a frequency range of 10-350Hz. With a minimum frequency of 10Hz, the DB3D can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Monitor XT12's min frequency of 24Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Polk Monitor XT12
B&W DB3D
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Polk Monitor XT12
B&W DB3D
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The Polk Monitor XT12 has a Bass Reflex type cabinet. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs. On the other hand the B&W DB3D have Acoustic Suspension type enclosure. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Polk Monitor XT12's and B&W DB3D's external dimensions. Polk Monitor XT12 has external dimensions of 418.0 x 408.0 x 485.0mm (16-7/16inch x 16-1/16inch x 19-1/16inch) whereas B&W DB3D has external dimensions of 368.3 x 341.3 x 347.7mm ().

Polk Monitor XT12 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 66.7mm wider, 49.7mm taller and 137.3mm deeper than B&W DB3D.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Polk Monitor XT12 is approximately 1978.8cm2 / 306.7inch2 and base area of the B&W DB3D is approximately 1186.7cm2 / 183.9inch2. The Monitor XT12 requires 67% more surface area than the DB3D which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Polk Monitor XT12 weighs 17.73kg / 39lbs and the B&W DB3D weighs 25.05kg / 55.1lbs. This makes the DB3D 41% heavier than the Monitor XT12.

Here is a comparison of how Monitor XT12 and DB3D's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Polk Monitor XT12
B&W DB3D
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Polk Monitor XT12?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Monitor XT12:
  • Black powered subwoofer
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • Grille
  • Owners Manual
  • Online registration card

What's in the Box of B&W DB3D?

Here are the items that come with the DB3D:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • 2 Grilles
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • 4 Decoupling feet
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • 4 Spike feet
  • 4 Lock-nuts
  • Cleaning cloth
  • Quickstart Guide
  • Bowers & Wilkins brochure
  • Warranty Information
  • Cleaning cloth instructions


Reasons to choose Polk Monitor XT12 over Bowers & Wilkins DB3D
Woofer Size 12 inches vs 8 inches Larger woofer
Price per pair* 399USD vs 3499USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Reasons to choose Bowers & Wilkins DB3D over Polk Monitor XT12
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 10 Hz vs 24 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 350 Hz vs 160 Hz Generates higher frequency
App-Based Control iOS,Android vs None Control the speaker via an app
Height 368mm vs 418mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 1186cm2 vs 1978cm2 Takes less floor space

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTPolk Monitor XT12 front: 408 x 418 mm (16.1 x 16.5 in)B&W DB3D front: 341 x 368 mm (13.4 x 14.5 in)Polk Monitor XT12408 × 418 mmB&W DB3D341 × 368 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTPolk Monitor XT12 footprint: 408 x 485 mm (16.1 x 19.1 in)B&W DB3D footprint: 341 x 348 mm (13.4 x 13.7 in)Polk Monitor XT12408 × 485 mmB&W DB3D341 × 348 mm
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.

Polk Monitor XT12 needs about 67% more floor area. Polk Monitor XT12 stands 137mm further into the room. Polk Monitor XT12 is 50mm taller.

Polk Monitor XT12 vs B&W DB3D Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Polk Monitor XT12 Bowers & Wilkins DB3D
Brand Polk Audio Bowers Wilkins
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 50 watts 1000 watts
Frequency Response 24-160 Hz 10-350Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 50-watt RMS 1000-watt RMS
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 2
Woofer Size 12" 8"
Woofer Composition Bi-laminate paper
Woofer Surround Material n/a Rubber
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction front n/a
Physical Specs
Height 418.0mm (16.5") 368.3mm (14.5")
Width 408.0mm (16.1") 341.3mm (13.4")
Depth 485.0mm (19.1") 347.7mm (13.7")
Weight 17.73kg (39lbs) 25.05kg (55.1lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Acoustic Suspension
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Other
Parts Warranty 3 Years 2 Years
Labor Warranty 3 Years 2 Years

Verdict

A ported subwoofer against a sealed one. That is the most consequential line on this page: it decides how the bass rolls off, how it behaves in a small room, and how much output you get for the size of the box.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass depthBB&W DB3D goes deeper - 10Hz against 24Hz. Under 20Hz is felt more than heard - the bottom of a pipe organ and the bottom of a film mix.
Amplifier powerBB&W DB3D has the bigger amplifier - 1000W against 50W RMS, about 13dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting.
Driver areaevenly matchedNear-identical radiating area (12" against 2 x 8").
EnclosuredependsPolk Monitor XT12 is ported - a ported box gives more output low down for its size, at the cost of a steeper roll-off below tuning; B&W DB3D is sealed - a sealed box rolls off gently and is usually the easier one to integrate in a small or awkward room. Neither is better in the abstract; ported tends to suit films and sealed tends to suit music, and both generalisations have exceptions.
Cabinet sizedependsB&W DB3D is about 47% smaller by volume. In a subwoofer that is a real trade rather than a preference: box volume is how you get output low down without a bigger amplifier.
WarrantyAPolk Monitor XT12 carries 3 years on parts against 2 years. A subwoofer amplifier works harder than anything else in the system, so this is not a throwaway line.
PriceAPolk Monitor XT12 costs less - $399 against $3,499, about 89% less.

A Polk Monitor XT12  B B&W DB3D
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

B&W DB3D is ahead, but on only 1 of the measured areas, and it costs about 8.8x the price. Polk Monitor XT12 is the sensible buy unless your room is large enough to need the extra. Films or music? If this is mainly a home cinema, Polk Monitor XT12 will hit harder for the money; if it is mainly for music in a normal-sized room, B&W DB3D is usually the easier one to make sound right. Two small subwoofers beat one big one in most rooms - a pair evens out the room modes in a way no single box can, whatever its specs. At $399 each, two Polk Monitor XT12 cost about $798 against $3,499 for one of the other, which is worth a thought.

One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.


Latest Powered Subwoofers
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
16-inch Woofer | 14.5-175 Hz | 800 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
14-inch Woofer | 15-180 Hz | 500 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
12-inch Woofer | 17-160 Hz | 400 watts
DALI BASIK SUB
DALI BASIK SUB
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Bluesound PULSE SUB
6.5-inch Woofer | | 350 watts
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts
Revel Performa4 B140
Revel Performa4 B140
10-inch Woofer | 26-150 Hz | 750 watts
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
9-inch Woofer | 20-230 Hz | 1200 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 15
MartinLogan Grotto 15
15-inch Woofer | 20-120 Hz | 1000 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 12
MartinLogan Grotto 12
12-inch Woofer | 22-120 Hz | 1000 watts

This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction