In this review, we will be comparing D3is In-Wall / On-Wall and KF92, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Perlisten and KEF. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall and KEF KF92 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.
The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.
Drivers
The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall and KEF KF92 have a totally different setup: the Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall features x -inch drivers whereas the KF92 features 2 x 9-inch drivers.
Frequency Response
D3is In-Wall / On-Wall has a frequency range of 20-290 Hz whereas KF92 has a frequency range of 11-200 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 11Hz, the KF92 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the D3is In-Wall / On-Wall's min frequency of 20Hz.
Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.
Low Frequency
Subwoofer Speakers
Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall
High Frequency
Subwoofer Speakers
Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall
Cabinet Type
The Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall has a Bass Reflex type cabinet. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs. On the other hand the KEF KF92 have Acoustic Suspension type enclosure. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs.
Physical Specs
The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall's and KEF KF92's external dimensions. Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall has external dimensions of () whereas KEF KF92 has external dimensions of 353.0 x 331.0 x 362.0mm (13-7/8 x 13 x 14-1/4inch).
KEF KF92 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 331mm wider, 353mm taller and 362mm deeper than Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall.
Weight Comparison The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall weighs 39.70kg / 87.3lbs and the KEF KF92 weighs 20.05kg / 44.1lbs. This makes the D3is In-Wall / On-Wall 98% heavier than the KF92.
Here is a comparison of how D3is In-Wall / On-Wall and KF92's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.
Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall
High Frequency Response |
290 Hz
vs
200 Hz
|
Generates higher frequency |
Height |
0mm
vs
353mm
|
Easier to fit in smaller spaces |
Base Surface Area |
0cm2
vs
1198cm2
|
Takes less floor space |
Woofer Size |
9 inches
vs
inches
|
Larger woofer |
Low Frequency Response |
11 Hz
vs
20 Hz
|
Generates deeper bass |
Price per pair* |
2000USD
vs
5995USD
|
costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time) |
| General |
Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall |
KEF KF92 |
| Brand |
Perlisten |
KEF |
| Speaker Type |
Powered Subwoofer |
Powered Subwoofer |
| Frequency Response |
20-290 Hz |
11-200 Hz |
Amplifier |
|
|
| Watts RMS (Continuous) |
n/a |
1000-watt RMS |
Drivers |
|
|
| Woofer Quantity |
|
2 |
| Woofer Size |
" |
9" |
| Woofer Composition |
|
Hybrid aluminum |
| Tweeter Size |
- |
- |
| Aimable Tweeter |
No |
No |
| Midrange Driver |
No |
No |
Physical Specs |
|
|
| Height |
mm (0") |
353.0mm (13.9") |
| Width |
mm (0") |
331.0mm (13") |
| Depth |
mm (0") |
362.0mm (14.3") |
| Weight |
39.70kg (87.3lbs) |
20.05kg (44.1lbs) |
| Enclosure |
Bass Reflex |
Acoustic Suspension |
| Grille |
Yes |
n/a |
| Moisture Resistancy |
No |
No |
Connections |
|
|
Other |
|
|
| Parts Warranty |
|
2 Years |
| Labor Warranty |
|
2 Years |
A ported subwoofer against a sealed one. That is the most consequential line on this page: it decides how the bass rolls off, how it behaves in a small room, and how much output you get for the size of the box.
| Area | Better | Why |
|---|
| Bass depth | B | KEF KF92 goes deeper - 11Hz against 20Hz. Under 20Hz is felt more than heard - the bottom of a pipe organ and the bottom of a film mix. |
| Enclosure | depends | Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall is ported - a ported box gives more output low down for its size, at the cost of a steeper roll-off below tuning; KEF KF92 is sealed - a sealed box rolls off gently and is usually the easier one to integrate in a small or awkward room. Neither is better in the abstract; ported tends to suit films and sealed tends to suit music, and both generalisations have exceptions. |
| Price | B | KEF KF92 costs less - $2,000 against $5,995, about 67% less. |
A Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall B KEF KF92
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.
Which should you choose?
KEF KF92 has the edge on paper, though not by much. The "depends" rows are more likely to decide this than the score is. Films or music? If this is mainly a home cinema, Perlisten D3is In-Wall / On-Wall will hit harder for the money; if it is mainly for music in a normal-sized room, KEF KF92 is usually the easier one to make sound right. Two small subwoofers beat one big one in most rooms - a pair evens out the room modes in a way no single box can, whatever its specs. At $2,000 each, two KEF KF92 cost about $4,000 against $5,995 for one of the other, which is worth a thought.
One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.