SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Powered Subwoofers
  3. MartinLogan Depth 212 vs Wharfedale SW-15
MartinLogan Depth 212 vs Wharfedale SW-15 Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

MartinLogan Depth 212

Powered Subwoofer | 18-120 Hz

MartinLogan Depth 212
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Wharfedale SW-15

Powered Subwoofer | 30-120 Hz

Wharfedale SW-15
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan Depth 212 MartinLogan Depth 21...
Check price atAmazon›
Wharfedale SW-15 Wharfedale SW-15
Check price atAmazon›
MartinLogan Depth 21...
See at AMAZON
Wharfedale SW-15
See at AMAZON

MartinLogan Depth 212 vs Wharfedale SW-15 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Depth 212 and SW-15, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from MartinLogan and Wharfedale. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of MartinLogan Depth 212 and Wharfedale SW-15 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsMartinLogan Depth 212Wharfedale SW-15
BrandMartinLogan
United States · founded 1982
Wharfedale
United Kingdom · founded 1932
Driver2 x 12" Aluminium15" Paper
Amplifier1100 watts RMS400 watts RMS
EnclosureSealedPorted
Frequency response18-120 Hz30-120 Hz
Weight57.60kg / 126.7lbs31.57kg / 69.5lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)21" x 19-13/16" x 20-3/8"
533.0 x 503.0 x 518.0mm
22-7/16" x 19-3/8" x 24-3/16"
570.0 x 493.0 x 615.0mm
Woofer - 12 inchWoofer - 12 inch
MartinLogan Depth 212
Woofer - 15 inch
Wharfedale SW-15

Woofer

Drivers drawn to scale and directly comparable. Cabinet outlines are indicative: full dimensions are not published for both. Hover a driver for its size.

The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.MartinLogan Depth 212 and Wharfedale SW-15 have a totally different setup: the MartinLogan Depth 212 features 2 x 12-inch drivers whereas the SW-15 features 1 x 15-inch drivers.

Frequency Response

Depth 212 has a frequency range of 18-120 Hz whereas SW-15 has a frequency range of 30-120 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 18Hz, the Depth 212 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the SW-15's min frequency of 30Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

MartinLogan Depth 212
Wharfedale SW-15
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

MartinLogan Depth 212
Wharfedale SW-15
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The MartinLogan Depth 212 has a Acoustic Suspension type cabinet. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs. On the other hand the Wharfedale SW-15 have Bass Reflex type enclosure. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare MartinLogan Depth 212's and Wharfedale SW-15's external dimensions. MartinLogan Depth 212 has external dimensions of 533.0 x 503.0 x 518.0mm (21 x 19-13/16 x 20-3/8inch) whereas Wharfedale SW-15 has external dimensions of 570.0 x 493.0 x 615.0mm (22-7/16inch x 19-3/8inch x 24-3/16inch).

MartinLogan Depth 212 is 37mm shorter and 97mm less deeper than Wharfedale SW-15 but it is also 10mm wider.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTMartinLogan Depth 212 front: 503 x 533 mm (19.8 x 21 in)Wharfedale SW-15 front: 493 x 570 mm (19.4 x 22.4 in)MartinLogan Depth 212503 × 533 mmWharfedale SW-15493 × 570 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTMartinLogan Depth 212 footprint: 503 x 518 mm (19.8 x 20.4 in)Wharfedale SW-15 footprint: 493 x 615 mm (19.4 x 24.2 in)MartinLogan Depth 212503 × 518 mmWharfedale SW-15493 × 615 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

Wharfedale SW-15 needs about 16% more floor or shelf area. Wharfedale SW-15 is 97mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. Wharfedale SW-15 is 37mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the MartinLogan Depth 212 is approximately 2605.5cm2 / 403.9inch2 and base area of the Wharfedale SW-15 is approximately 3032.0cm2 / 470.0inch2. The Depth 212 requires 14% less surface area than the SW-15 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The MartinLogan Depth 212 weighs 57.60kg / 126.7lbs and the Wharfedale SW-15 weighs 31.57kg / 69.5lbs. This makes the Depth 212 82% heavier than the SW-15.

Here is a comparison of how Depth 212 and SW-15's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
MartinLogan Depth 212
Wharfedale SW-15
Min
Average
Max

Reasons to choose MartinLogan Depth 212 over Wharfedale SW-15
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 18 Hz vs 30 Hz Generates deeper bass
Height 533mm vs 570mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 2605cm2 vs 3032cm2 Takes less floor space
Reasons to choose Wharfedale SW-15 over MartinLogan Depth 212
Woofer Size 15 inches vs 12 inches Larger woofer
Price per pair* 1199USD vs 5500USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTMartinLogan Depth 212 front: 503 x 533 mm (19.8 x 21 in)Wharfedale SW-15 front: 493 x 570 mm (19.4 x 22.4 in)MartinLogan Depth 212503 × 533 mmWharfedale SW-15493 × 570 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTMartinLogan Depth 212 footprint: 503 x 518 mm (19.8 x 20.4 in)Wharfedale SW-15 footprint: 493 x 615 mm (19.4 x 24.2 in)MartinLogan Depth 212503 × 518 mmWharfedale SW-15493 × 615 mm
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.

Wharfedale SW-15 needs about 16% more floor area. Wharfedale SW-15 stands 97mm further into the room. Wharfedale SW-15 is 37mm taller.

MartinLogan Depth 212 vs Wharfedale SW-15 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General MartinLogan Depth 212 Wharfedale SW-15
Brand MartinLogan Wharfedale
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 1100 watts 400 watts
Frequency Response 18-120 Hz 30-120 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 1100-watt RMS 400-watt RMS
Watts Peak (Max) 2200-watt RMS n/a
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 1
Woofer Size 12" 15"
Woofer Composition Aluminium Paper
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Crossover Frequency 35–120Hz n/a
Firing Direction n/a front
Physical Specs
Height 533.0mm (21") 570.0mm (22.4")
Width 503.0mm (19.8") 493.0mm (19.4")
Depth 518.0mm (20.4") 615.0mm (24.2")
Weight 57.60kg (126.7lbs) 31.57kg (69.5lbs)
Enclosure Acoustic Suspension Bass Reflex
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Other
Parts Warranty 3 Years
Labor Warranty 3 Years

Verdict

A sealed subwoofer against a ported one. That is the most consequential line on this page: it decides how the bass rolls off, how it behaves in a small room, and how much output you get for the size of the box.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass depthAMartinLogan Depth 212 goes deeper - 18Hz against 30Hz. Under 20Hz is felt more than heard - the bottom of a pipe organ and the bottom of a film mix.
Amplifier powerAMartinLogan Depth 212 has the bigger amplifier - 1100W against 400W RMS, about 4.4dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting.
Driver areaAMartinLogan Depth 212 moves more air: 2 x 12" against 15" is 1.28x the cone area, not the 1.13x the diameters suggest. More area means the same output with less excursion, and less distortion with it.
EnclosuredependsMartinLogan Depth 212 is sealed - a sealed box rolls off gently and is usually the easier one to integrate in a small or awkward room; Wharfedale SW-15 is ported - a ported box gives more output low down for its size, at the cost of a steeper roll-off below tuning. Neither is better in the abstract; ported tends to suit films and sealed tends to suit music, and both generalisations have exceptions.
Speaker-level inputsAMartinLogan Depth 212 takes a speaker-level connection as well as line level. That is what lets it work with an integrated amplifier or a vintage receiver that has no subwoofer output at all.
Cabinet sizedependsMartinLogan Depth 212 is about 20% smaller by volume. In a subwoofer that is a real trade rather than a preference: box volume is how you get output low down without a bigger amplifier.
PriceBWharfedale SW-15 costs less - $1,199 against $5,500, about 78% less.

A MartinLogan Depth 212  B Wharfedale SW-15
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: MartinLogan Depth 212 measures better, Wharfedale SW-15 costs about 78% less. In a normal room, placement will make a bigger difference than the gap between these two. Films or music? If this is mainly a home cinema, Wharfedale SW-15 will hit harder for the money; if it is mainly for music in a normal-sized room, MartinLogan Depth 212 is usually the easier one to make sound right. Check your amplifier first: if it has no subwoofer or preamp output, MartinLogan Depth 212 is the only one of these two you can connect at all.

One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.


Latest Powered Subwoofers
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
16-inch Woofer | 14.5-175 Hz | 800 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
14-inch Woofer | 15-180 Hz | 500 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
12-inch Woofer | 17-160 Hz | 400 watts
DALI BASIK SUB
DALI BASIK SUB
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Bluesound PULSE SUB
6.5-inch Woofer | | 350 watts
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts
Revel Performa4 B140
Revel Performa4 B140
10-inch Woofer | 26-150 Hz | 750 watts
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
9-inch Woofer | 20-230 Hz | 1200 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 15
MartinLogan Grotto 15
15-inch Woofer | 20-120 Hz | 1000 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 12
MartinLogan Grotto 12
12-inch Woofer | 22-120 Hz | 1000 watts

This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction