SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Powered Subwoofers
  3. Klipsch RP-1400CSW vs KEF KUBE 10b
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW vs KEF KUBE 10b Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Klipsch RP-1400CSW

Powered Subwoofer | 15-180 Hz

Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
KEF KUBE 10b

Powered Subwoofer | 24-140 Hz

KEF KUBE 10b
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch RP-1400CSW Klipsch RP-1400CSW
Check price atAmazon›
KEF KUBE 10b KEF KUBE 10b
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch RP-1400CSW
See at AMAZON
KEF KUBE 10b
See at AMAZON

Klipsch RP-1400CSW vs KEF KUBE 10b Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing RP-1400CSW and KUBE 10b, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Klipsch and KEF. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch RP-1400CSW and KEF KUBE 10b first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsKlipsch RP-1400CSWKEF KUBE 10b
BrandKlipsch
United States · founded 1946
KEF
United Kingdom · founded 1961
Driver14" Cerametallic10"
Amplifier500 watts RMS300 watts RMS
EnclosureSealedSealed
Frequency response15-180 Hz24-140 Hz
Weight27.08kg / 59.6lbs17.50kg / 38.5lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)17.48" x 16.6" x 16.6"
444.0 x 421.6 x 421.6mm
14-5/8" x 14" x 15-5/8"
372.0 x 356.0 x 397.0mm
Woofer - 14 inch
Klipsch RP-1400CSW
Woofer - 10 inch
KEF KUBE 10b

Woofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Both Klipsch RP-1400CSWand KEF KUBE 10b have a single woofer setup however the Klipsch RP-1400CSW's woofer is 14-inch whereas the KEF KUBE 10b features a 10-inch woofer.

Frequency Response

RP-1400CSW has a frequency range of 15-180 Hz whereas KUBE 10b has a frequency range of 24-140 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 15Hz, the RP-1400CSW can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the KUBE 10b's min frequency of 24Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Klipsch RP-1400CSW
KEF KUBE 10b
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Klipsch RP-1400CSW
KEF KUBE 10b
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

Both Klipsch RP-1400CSW and KEF KUBE 10b have Acoustic Suspension type cabinets. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch RP-1400CSW's and KEF KUBE 10b's external dimensions. Klipsch RP-1400CSW has external dimensions of 444.0 x 421.6 x 421.6mm (17.48inch x 16.6inch x 16.6inch) whereas KEF KUBE 10b has external dimensions of 372.0 x 356.0 x 397.0mm (14-5/8 x 14 x 15-5/8inch).

Klipsch RP-1400CSW is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 65.6mm wider, 72mm taller and 24.6mm deeper than KEF KUBE 10b.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Klipsch RP-1400CSW is approximately 1777.5cm2 / 275.5inch2 and base area of the KEF KUBE 10b is approximately 1413.3cm2 / 219.1inch2. The RP-1400CSW requires 26% more surface area than the KUBE 10b which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Klipsch RP-1400CSW weighs 27.08kg / 59.6lbs and the KEF KUBE 10b weighs 17.50kg / 38.5lbs. This makes the RP-1400CSW 55% heavier than the KUBE 10b.

Here is a comparison of how RP-1400CSW and KUBE 10b's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Klipsch RP-1400CSW
KEF KUBE 10b
Min
Average
Max

Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW over KEF KUBE 10b
Woofer Size 14 inches vs 10 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 15 Hz vs 24 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 180 Hz vs 140 Hz Generates higher frequency
Reasons to choose KEF KUBE 10b over Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Height 372mm vs 444mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 1413cm2 vs 1777cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 750USD vs 1100USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTKlipsch RP-1400CSW front: 422 x 444 mm (16.6 x 17.5 in)KEF KUBE 10b front: 356 x 372 mm (14 x 14.6 in)Klipsch RP-1400CSW422 × 444 mmKEF KUBE 10b356 × 372 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTKlipsch RP-1400CSW footprint: 422 x 422 mm (16.6 x 16.6 in)KEF KUBE 10b footprint: 356 x 397 mm (14 x 15.6 in)Klipsch RP-1400CSW422 × 422 mmKEF KUBE 10b356 × 397 mm
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.

Klipsch RP-1400CSW needs about 26% more floor area. Klipsch RP-1400CSW stands 25mm further into the room. Klipsch RP-1400CSW is 72mm taller.

Klipsch RP-1400CSW vs KEF KUBE 10b Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW KEF KUBE 10b
Brand Klipsch KEF
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 500 watts 300 watts
Frequency Response 15-180 Hz 24-140 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 500-watt RMS 300-watt RMS
Watts Peak (Max) 1000-watt RMS n/a
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 14" 10"
Woofer Composition Cerametallic
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Crossover Frequency n/a 40-140 Hz
Firing Direction n/a front
Physical Specs
Height 444.0mm (17.5") 372.0mm (14.6")
Width 421.6mm (16.6") 356.0mm (14")
Depth 421.6mm (16.6") 397.0mm (15.6")
Weight 27.08kg (59.6lbs) 17.50kg (38.5lbs)
Enclosure Acoustic Suspension Acoustic Suspension
Finish MDF with Vinyl n/a
Available Colors Ebony n/a
Grille Yes n/a
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Other
Parts Warranty 2 Years
Labor Warranty 2 Years

Verdict

Two quite different sizes of subwoofer. Room volume decides this more than anything else on the page: a big driver in a small room is wasted, and a small one in a large room is worked to death.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass depthAKlipsch RP-1400CSW goes deeper - 15Hz against 24Hz. Under 20Hz is felt more than heard - the bottom of a pipe organ and the bottom of a film mix.
Amplifier powerAKlipsch RP-1400CSW has the bigger amplifier - 500W against 300W RMS, about 2.2dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting.
Driver areaAKlipsch RP-1400CSW moves more air: 14" against 10" is 1.96x the cone area, not the 1.4x the diameters suggest. More area means the same output with less excursion, and less distortion with it.
Enclosureevenly matchedBoth are sealed designs, so they roll off in much the same way.
Cabinet sizedependsKEF KUBE 10b is about 33% smaller by volume. In a subwoofer that is a real trade rather than a preference: box volume is how you get output low down without a bigger amplifier.
PriceBKEF KUBE 10b costs less - $750 against $1,100, about 32% less.

A Klipsch RP-1400CSW  B KEF KUBE 10b
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: Klipsch RP-1400CSW measures better, KEF KUBE 10b costs about 32% less. In a normal room, placement will make a bigger difference than the gap between these two. If placement is the constraint - a corner, behind a sofa, under a desk - KEF KUBE 10b is the one that will actually go there, and a well-placed small subwoofer beats a badly-placed big one every time.

One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.


Latest Powered Subwoofers
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
16-inch Woofer | 14.5-175 Hz | 800 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
14-inch Woofer | 15-180 Hz | 500 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
12-inch Woofer | 17-160 Hz | 400 watts
DALI BASIK SUB
DALI BASIK SUB
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Bluesound PULSE SUB
6.5-inch Woofer | | 350 watts
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts
Revel Performa4 B140
Revel Performa4 B140
10-inch Woofer | 26-150 Hz | 750 watts
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
9-inch Woofer | 20-230 Hz | 1200 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 15
MartinLogan Grotto 15
15-inch Woofer | 20-120 Hz | 1000 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 12
MartinLogan Grotto 12
12-inch Woofer | 22-120 Hz | 1000 watts

This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction