In this review, we will be comparing RP-1200CSW and RP-1600CSW, two Powered Subwoofer speakers by Klipsch. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch RP-1200CSW and Klipsch RP-1600CSW first before getting into our more detailed comparison.
The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.
Drivers
The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Both Klipsch RP-1200CSWand Klipsch RP-1600CSW have a single woofer setup however the Klipsch RP-1200CSW's woofer is 12-inch whereas the Klipsch RP-1600CSW features a 16-inch woofer.
Frequency Response
RP-1200CSW has a frequency range of 17-160 Hz whereas RP-1600CSW has a frequency range of 14.5-175 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 15Hz, the RP-1600CSW can go slightly deeper then the RP-1200CSW's min frequency of 17Hz.
Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.
Low Frequency
Subwoofer Speakers
High Frequency
Subwoofer Speakers
Cabinet Type
Both Klipsch RP-1200CSW and Klipsch RP-1600CSW have Acoustic Suspension type cabinets. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs.
Physical Specs
The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch RP-1200CSW's and Klipsch RP-1600CSW's external dimensions. Klipsch RP-1200CSW has external dimensions of 399.5 x 376.9 x 416.1mm (15.73inch x 14.84inch x 16.38inch) whereas Klipsch RP-1600CSW has external dimensions of 488.2 x 465.6 x 465.6mm (19.22inch x 18.33inch x 18.33inch).
Klipsch RP-1600CSW is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 88.7mm wider, 88.7mm taller and 49.5mm deeper than Klipsch RP-1200CSW.
Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited.
The base surface area of the Klipsch RP-1200CSW is approximately 1568.3cm2 / 243.1inch2 and base area of the Klipsch RP-1600CSW is approximately 2167.8cm2 / 336.0inch2. The RP-1200CSW requires 28% less surface area than the RP-1600CSW which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.
Weight Comparison The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Klipsch RP-1200CSW weighs 21.64kg / 47.6lbs and the Klipsch RP-1600CSW weighs 35.74kg / 78.6lbs. This makes the RP-1600CSW 65% heavier than the RP-1200CSW.
Here is a comparison of how RP-1200CSW and RP-1600CSW's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.
Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
 Height |
399mm
vs
488mm
|
Easier to fit in smaller spaces |
 Base Surface Area |
1568cm2
vs
2167cm2
|
Takes less floor space |
 Price per pair* |
850USD
vs
1500USD
|
costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time) |
 Woofer Size |
16 inches
vs
12 inches
|
Larger woofer |
| Low Frequency Response |
15 Hz
vs
17 Hz
|
Generates deeper bass |
 High Frequency Response |
175 Hz
vs
160 Hz
|
Generates higher frequency |
Size, drawn to scale
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.
One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.
Klipsch RP-1600CSW needs about 38% more floor area. Klipsch RP-1600CSW stands 50mm further into the room. Klipsch RP-1600CSW is 89mm taller.
| General |
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW |
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW |
| Brand |
Klipsch |
Klipsch |
| Speaker Type |
Powered Subwoofer |
Powered Subwoofer |
| Max Amplifier Output |
400 watts |
800 watts |
| Frequency Response |
17-160 Hz |
14.5-175 Hz |
Amplifier |
|
|
| Watts RMS (Continuous) |
400-watt RMS |
800-watt RMS |
| Watts Peak (Max) |
800-watt RMS |
1600-watt RMS |
Drivers |
|
|
| Woofer Quantity |
1 |
1 |
| Woofer Size |
12" |
16" |
| Woofer Composition |
Cerametallic |
Cerametallic |
| Tweeter Size |
- |
- |
| Aimable Tweeter |
No |
No |
| Midrange Driver |
No |
No |
Physical Specs |
|
|
| Height |
399.5mm (15.7") |
488.2mm (19.2") |
| Width |
376.9mm (14.8") |
465.6mm (18.3") |
| Depth |
416.1mm (16.4") |
465.6mm (18.3") |
| Weight |
21.64kg (47.6lbs) |
35.74kg (78.6lbs) |
| Enclosure |
Acoustic Suspension |
Acoustic Suspension |
| Finish |
MDF with Vinyl |
MDF with Vinyl |
| Available Colors |
Ebony |
Ebony |
| Grille |
Yes |
Yes |
| Moisture Resistancy |
No |
No |
Connections |
|
|
Other |
|
|
| Parts Warranty |
|
|
| Labor Warranty |
|
|
Siblings in Klipsch's Reference Premiere Compact Sub range - same design thinking, different size. It comes down to your room and your budget.
| Area | Better | Why |
|---|
| Bass depth | evenly matched | Effectively the same reach (17Hz vs 15Hz). |
| Amplifier power | B | Klipsch RP-1600CSW has the bigger amplifier - 800W against 400W RMS, about 3dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting. |
| Driver area | B | Klipsch RP-1600CSW moves more air: 16" against 12" is 1.78x the cone area, not the 1.33x the diameters suggest. More area means the same output with less excursion, and less distortion with it. |
| Enclosure | evenly matched | Both are sealed designs, so they roll off in much the same way. |
| Cabinet size | depends | Klipsch RP-1200CSW is about 41% smaller by volume. In a subwoofer that is a real trade rather than a preference: box volume is how you get output low down without a bigger amplifier. |
| Price | A | Klipsch RP-1200CSW costs less - $850 against $1,500, about 43% less. |
A Klipsch RP-1200CSW B Klipsch RP-1600CSW
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.
Which should you choose?
The usual trade-off: Klipsch RP-1600CSW measures better, Klipsch RP-1200CSW costs about 43% less. In a normal room, placement will make a bigger difference than the gap between these two. Two small subwoofers beat one big one in most rooms - a pair evens out the room modes in a way no single box can, whatever its specs. At $850 each, two Klipsch RP-1200CSW cost about $1,700 against $1,500 for one of the other, which is worth a thought. If placement is the constraint - a corner, behind a sofa, under a desk - Klipsch RP-1200CSW is the one that will actually go there, and a well-placed small subwoofer beats a badly-placed big one every time.
One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.