In this review, we will be comparing SUB6 and KC62, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Kanto and KEF. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Kanto SUB6 and KEF KC62 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.
The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.
Drivers
The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Kanto SUB6 and KEF KC62 have a totally different setup: the Kanto SUB6 features 1 x 6-inch drivers whereas the KC62 features 2 x 6.5-inch drivers.
Frequency Response
SUB6 has a frequency range of 35-165 Hz whereas KC62 has a frequency range of 11-200 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 11Hz, the KC62 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the SUB6's min frequency of 35Hz.
Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.
Low Frequency
Subwoofer Speakers
High Frequency
Subwoofer Speakers
Physical Specs
The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Kanto SUB6's and KEF KC62's external dimensions. Kanto SUB6 has external dimensions of 241.3 x 222.3 x 266.7mm () whereas KEF KC62 has external dimensions of 245.0 x 258.0 x 281.0mm (9-5/8inch x 10-1/8inch x 11-1/16inch).
KEF KC62 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 35.7mm wider, 3.7mm taller and 14.3mm deeper than Kanto SUB6.
Size, drawn to scale
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.
One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.
KEF KC62 needs about 22% more floor or shelf area.
Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited.
The base surface area of the Kanto SUB6 is approximately 592.9cm2 / 91.9inch2 and base area of the KEF KC62 is approximately 725.0cm2 / 112.4inch2. The SUB6 requires 18% less surface area than the KC62 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.
Weight Comparison The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Kanto SUB6 weighs 5.31kg / 11.7lbs and the KEF KC62 weighs 14.05kg / 30.9lbs. This makes the KC62 165% heavier than the SUB6.
Here is a comparison of how SUB6 and KC62's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.
Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
 Height |
241mm
vs
245mm
|
Easier to fit in smaller spaces |
 Base Surface Area |
592cm2
vs
725cm2
|
Takes less floor space |
 Price per pair* |
300USD
vs
1500USD
|
costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time) |
 Woofer Size |
6.5 inches
vs
6 inches
|
Larger woofer |
| Number of Woofers |
2
vs
1
|
More woofers |
| Low Frequency Response |
11 Hz
vs
35 Hz
|
Generates deeper bass |
 High Frequency Response |
200 Hz
vs
165 Hz
|
Generates higher frequency |
Size, drawn to scale
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.
One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.
KEF KC62 needs about 22% more floor area.
| General |
Kanto SUB6 |
KEF KC62 |
| Brand |
Kanto |
KEF |
| Speaker Type |
Powered Subwoofer |
Powered Subwoofer |
| Frequency Response |
35-165 Hz |
11-200 Hz |
Amplifier |
|
|
| Watts RMS (Continuous) |
100-watt RMS |
1000-watt RMS |
| Watts Peak (Max) |
200-watt RMS |
n/a |
Drivers |
|
|
| Woofer Quantity |
1 |
2 |
| Woofer Size |
6" |
6.5" |
| Woofer Composition |
|
|
| Tweeter Size |
- |
- |
| Aimable Tweeter |
No |
No |
| Midrange Driver |
No |
No |
| Firing Direction |
n/a |
side |
Physical Specs |
|
|
| Height |
241.3mm (9.5") |
245.0mm (9.6") |
| Width |
222.3mm (8.8") |
258.0mm (10.2") |
| Depth |
266.7mm (10.5") |
281.0mm (11.1") |
| Weight |
5.31kg (11.7lbs) |
14.05kg (30.9lbs) |
| Enclosure |
|
Acoustic Suspension |
| Moisture Resistancy |
No |
No |
Connections |
|
|
Other |
|
|
| Parts Warranty |
2 Years |
2 Years |
| Labor Warranty |
2 Years |
2 Years |
Two quite different sizes of subwoofer. Room volume decides this more than anything else on the page: a big driver in a small room is wasted, and a small one in a large room is worked to death.
| Area | Better | Why |
|---|
| Bass depth | B | KEF KC62 goes deeper - 11Hz against 35Hz. Under 20Hz is felt more than heard - the bottom of a pipe organ and the bottom of a film mix. |
| Amplifier power | B | KEF KC62 has the bigger amplifier - 1000W against 100W RMS, about 10dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting. |
| Driver area | B | KEF KC62 moves more air: 2 x 6.5" against 6" is 2.35x the cone area, not the 1.53x the diameters suggest. More area means the same output with less excursion, and less distortion with it. |
| Enclosure | evenly matched | Both are sealed designs, so they roll off in much the same way. |
| Cabinet size | depends | Kanto SUB6 is about 19% smaller by volume. In a subwoofer that is a real trade rather than a preference: box volume is how you get output low down without a bigger amplifier. |
| Price | A | Kanto SUB6 costs less - $300 against $1,500, about 80% less. |
A Kanto SUB6 B KEF KC62
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.
Which should you choose?
The usual trade-off: KEF KC62 measures better, Kanto SUB6 costs about 80% less. In a normal room, placement will make a bigger difference than the gap between these two. Two small subwoofers beat one big one in most rooms - a pair evens out the room modes in a way no single box can, whatever its specs. At $300 each, two Kanto SUB6 cost about $600 against $1,500 for one of the other, which is worth a thought.
One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.