SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SOUNDBARS
    • Soundbars
      Soundbars Home All Soundbars (filter + sort) Size Simulator
      By TV Size
      43-50 inch TVs 55 inch TVs 65 inch and larger
      By Feature
      Dolby Atmos height channels Subwoofer included Can add rear speakers Compact (30 in or narrower) Under $500
      By Brand
      Bluesound Bose Denon Devialet Dual Furrion Harman Kardon JBL KEF Klipsch Marshall Polk Audio Samsung Sennheiser Sonos Sony WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Powered Subwoofers
  3. KEF KC62 vs ELAC Muro SUB2010
KEF KC62 vs ELAC Muro SUB2010 Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

KEF KC62

Powered Subwoofer | 11-200 Hz

KEF KC62
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
ELAC Muro SUB2010

Powered Subwoofer | 38-150 Hz

ELAC Muro SUB2010
Check price atAmazon›
KEF KC62 KEF KC62
Check price atAmazon›
ELAC Muro SUB2010 ELAC Muro SUB2010
Check price atAmazon›
KEF KC62
See at AMAZON
ELAC Muro SUB2010
See at AMAZON

KEF KC62 vs ELAC Muro SUB2010 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing KC62 and Muro SUB2010, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from KEF and ELAC. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF KC62 and ELAC Muro SUB2010 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsKEF KC62ELAC Muro SUB2010
BrandKEF
United Kingdom · founded 1961
ELAC
Germany · founded 1926
Driver2 x 6.5"8" Polypropylene
Amplifier1000 watts RMS125 watts RMS
EnclosureSealedPorted
Frequency response11-200 Hz38-150 Hz
App control—Yes
Weight14.05kg / 30.9lbs7.82kg / 17.2lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)9-5/8" x 10-1/8" x 11-1/16"
245.0 x 258.0 x 281.0mm
15-1/4" x 5-5/16" x 15-15/16"
388.0 x 135.0 x 405.0mm
Woofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
KEF KC62
Woofer - 8 inch
ELAC Muro SUB2010

Woofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.KEF KC62 and ELAC Muro SUB2010 have a totally different setup: the KEF KC62 features 2 x 6.5-inch drivers whereas the Muro SUB2010 features 1 x 8-inch drivers.

Frequency Response

KC62 has a frequency range of 11-200 Hz whereas Muro SUB2010 has a frequency range of 38-150 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 11Hz, the KC62 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Muro SUB2010's min frequency of 38Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

KEF KC62
ELAC Muro SUB2010
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

KEF KC62
ELAC Muro SUB2010
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The KEF KC62 has a Acoustic Suspension type cabinet. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs. On the other hand the ELAC Muro SUB2010 have Bass Reflex type enclosure. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare KEF KC62's and ELAC Muro SUB2010's external dimensions. KEF KC62 has external dimensions of 245.0 x 258.0 x 281.0mm (9-5/8inch x 10-1/8inch x 11-1/16inch) whereas ELAC Muro SUB2010 has external dimensions of 388.0 x 135.0 x 405.0mm (15-1/4 x 5-5/16 x 15-15/16inch).

KEF KC62 is 143mm shorter and 124mm less deeper than ELAC Muro SUB2010 but it is also 123mm wider.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of KEF KC62 and ELAC Muro SUB2010 in scale.

KEF KC62 vs ELAC Muro SUB2010 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of KEF KC62 and ELAC Muro SUB2010 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the KEF KC62 is approximately 725.0cm2 / 112.4inch2 and base area of the ELAC Muro SUB2010 is approximately 546.8cm2 / 84.8inch2. The KC62 requires 33% more surface area than the Muro SUB2010 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The KEF KC62 weighs 14.05kg / 30.9lbs and the ELAC Muro SUB2010 weighs 7.82kg / 17.2lbs. This makes the KC62 80% heavier than the Muro SUB2010.

Here is a comparison of how KC62 and Muro SUB2010's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
KEF KC62
ELAC Muro SUB2010
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of KEF KC62?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of KC62:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • Speaker-level input block
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Information
  • Warranty Information

What's in the Box of ELAC Muro SUB2010?

Here are the items that come with the Muro SUB2010:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • 6-feet AC power cord
  • 4 Cone feet
  • 2 Brackets
  • 2 Machine screws
  • 2 Wood screws
  • 2 Washers
  • 2 Wall anchors
  • Operating Instructions


Reasons to choose KEF KC62 over ELAC Muro SUB2010
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 11 Hz vs 38 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 200 Hz vs 150 Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 245mm vs 388mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Reasons to choose ELAC Muro SUB2010 over KEF KC62
Woofer Size 8 inches vs 6.5 inches Larger woofer
App-Based Control iOS,Android vs None Control the speaker via an app
Base Surface Area 546cm2 vs 725cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 770USD vs 1500USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTKEF KC62 front: 258 x 245 mm (10.2 x 9.6 in)ELAC Muro SUB2010 front: 135 x 388 mm (5.3 x 15.3 in)KEF KC62258 × 245 mmELAC Muro SUB2010135 × 388 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTKEF KC62 footprint: 258 x 281 mm (10.2 x 11.1 in)ELAC Muro SUB2010 footprint: 135 x 405 mm (5.3 x 15.9 in)KEF KC62258 × 281 mmELAC Muro SUB2010135 × 405 mm
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.

KEF KC62 needs about 33% more floor area. ELAC Muro SUB2010 stands 124mm further into the room. ELAC Muro SUB2010 is 143mm taller.

KEF KC62 vs ELAC Muro SUB2010 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General KEF KC62 ELAC Muro SUB2010
Brand KEF ELAC
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 1000 watts 125 watts
Frequency Response 11-200 Hz 38-150 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 1000-watt RMS 125-watt RMS
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 1
Woofer Size 6.5" 8"
Woofer Composition Polypropylene
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction side side or bottom
Physical Specs
Height 245.0mm (9.6") 388.0mm (15.3")
Width 258.0mm (10.2") 135.0mm (5.3")
Depth 281.0mm (11.1") 405.0mm (15.9")
Weight 14.05kg (30.9lbs) 7.82kg (17.2lbs)
Enclosure Acoustic Suspension Bass Reflex
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Other
Parts Warranty 2 Years 1 Year
Labor Warranty 2 Years 1 Year

Verdict

A sealed subwoofer against a ported one. That is the most consequential line on this page: it decides how the bass rolls off, how it behaves in a small room, and how much output you get for the size of the box.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass depthAKEF KC62 goes deeper - 11Hz against 38Hz. Under 20Hz is felt more than heard - the bottom of a pipe organ and the bottom of a film mix.
Amplifier powerAKEF KC62 has the bigger amplifier - 1000W against 125W RMS, about 9dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting.
Driver areaAKEF KC62 moves more air: 2 x 6.5" against 8" is 1.32x the cone area, not the 1.15x the diameters suggest. More area means the same output with less excursion, and less distortion with it.
EnclosuredependsKEF KC62 is sealed - a sealed box rolls off gently and is usually the easier one to integrate in a small or awkward room; ELAC Muro SUB2010 is ported - a ported box gives more output low down for its size, at the cost of a steeper roll-off below tuning. Neither is better in the abstract; ported tends to suit films and sealed tends to suit music, and both generalisations have exceptions.
Speaker-level inputsAKEF KC62 takes a speaker-level connection as well as line level. That is what lets it work with an integrated amplifier or a vintage receiver that has no subwoofer output at all.
Driver placementdependsKEF KC62 fires side and ELAC Muro SUB2010 fires side or down. A down-firing driver is more forgiving of a grille-less look and of a hard floor; a front-firing one is the safer choice on a thick carpet or a suspended timber floor.
WarrantyAKEF KC62 carries 2 years on parts against 1 years. A subwoofer amplifier works harder than anything else in the system, so this is not a throwaway line.
PriceBELAC Muro SUB2010 costs less - $770 against $1,500, about 49% less.

A KEF KC62  B ELAC Muro SUB2010
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: KEF KC62 measures better, ELAC Muro SUB2010 costs about 49% less. In a normal room, placement will make a bigger difference than the gap between these two. Films or music? If this is mainly a home cinema, ELAC Muro SUB2010 will hit harder for the money; if it is mainly for music in a normal-sized room, KEF KC62 is usually the easier one to make sound right. Check your amplifier first: if it has no subwoofer or preamp output, KEF KC62 is the only one of these two you can connect at all.

One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.


Latest Powered Subwoofers
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
16-inch Woofer | 14.5-175 Hz | 800 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
14-inch Woofer | 15-180 Hz | 500 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
12-inch Woofer | 17-160 Hz | 400 watts
DALI BASIK SUB
DALI BASIK SUB
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Wharfedale Nova 15
Wharfedale Nova 15
15-inch Woofer | 28 Hz (-6dB) | 360 watts
Wharfedale Nova 12
Wharfedale Nova 12
12-inch Woofer | 28 Hz (-6dB) | 280 watts
Wharfedale Nova 10
Wharfedale Nova 10
10-inch Woofer | 29 Hz (-6dB) | 230 watts
Wharfedale Nova 8
Wharfedale Nova 8
8-inch Woofer | 33 Hz (-6dB) | 200 watts
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Bluesound PULSE SUB
6.5-inch Woofer | | 350 watts
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts

This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction