SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Powered Subwoofers
  3. Focal Cub3 vs B&W ASW608
Focal Cub3 vs Bowers Wilkins & Wilkins ASW608 Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Focal Cub3

Powered Subwoofer | 40-150 Hz

Focal Cub3
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
B&W ASW608

Powered Subwoofer | 32-140 Hz

Bowers & Wilkins ASW608
Check price atAmazon›
Focal Cub3 Focal Cub3
Check price atAmazon›
B&W ASW608 B&W ASW608
Check price atAmazon›
Focal Cub3
See at AMAZON
B&W ASW608
See at AMAZON

Focal Cub3 vs B&W ASW608 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Cub3 and ASW608, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Focal and Bowers Wilkins. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Focal Cub3 and B&W ASW608 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsFocal Cub3B&W ASW608
BrandFocal
France · founded 1979
Bowers Wilkins
United Kingdom · founded 1966
Driver8" Polyflex8" Paper/Aramid Fiber
Amplifier150 watts RMS200 watts RMS
EnclosurePortedSealed
Frequency response40-150 Hz32-140 Hz
Weight10.09kg / 22.2lbs8.86kg / 19.5lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)13-1/16" x 11-7/8" x 13-15/16"
332.0 x 302.0 x 355.0mm
10-11/16" x 10-1/4" x 13-3/4"
272.0 x 261.0 x 350.0mm
Woofer - 8 inch
Focal Cub3
Woofer - 8 inch
B&W ASW608

Woofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Focal Cub3and B&W ASW608 have the same driver set up: Both subwoofers have 1 x 8" drivers.

Frequency Response

Cub3 has a frequency range of 40-150 Hz whereas ASW608 has a frequency range of 32-140 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 32Hz, the ASW608 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Cub3's min frequency of 40Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Focal Cub3
B&W ASW608
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Focal Cub3
B&W ASW608
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The Focal Cub3 has a Bass Reflex type cabinet. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs. On the other hand the B&W ASW608 have Acoustic Suspension type enclosure. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Focal Cub3's and B&W ASW608's external dimensions. Focal Cub3 has external dimensions of 332.0 x 302.0 x 355.0mm (13-1/16inch x 11-7/8inch x 13-15/16inch) whereas B&W ASW608 has external dimensions of 272.0 x 261.0 x 350.0mm (10-11/16 x 10-1/4 x 13-3/4inch).

Focal Cub3 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 41mm wider, 60mm taller and 5mm deeper than B&W ASW608.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Focal Cub3 and B&W ASW608 in scale.

Focal Cub3 vs B&W ASW608 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Focal Cub3 and B&W ASW608 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Focal Cub3 is approximately 1072.1cm2 / 166.2inch2 and base area of the B&W ASW608 is approximately 913.5cm2 / 141.6inch2. The Cub3 requires 17% more surface area than the ASW608 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Focal Cub3 weighs 10.09kg / 22.2lbs and the B&W ASW608 weighs 8.86kg / 19.5lbs. This makes the Cub3 14% heavier than the ASW608.

Here is a comparison of how Cub3 and ASW608's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Focal Cub3
B&W ASW608
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Focal Cub3?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Cub3:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • 8-feet AC power cord
  • User Manual
  • Thank You Card

What's in the Box of B&W ASW608?

Here are the items that come with the ASW608:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • Grille
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • 4 Spike feet
  • 4 Lock-nuts
  • Manual
  • Bowers & Wilkins brochure
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose Focal Cub3 over Bowers & Wilkins ASW608
High Frequency Response 150 Hz vs 140 Hz Generates higher frequency
Price per pair* 261USD vs 599USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Reasons to choose Bowers & Wilkins ASW608 over Focal Cub3
Low Frequency Response 32 Hz vs 40 Hz Generates deeper bass
Height 272mm vs 332mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 913cm2 vs 1072cm2 Takes less floor space

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTFocal Cub3 front: 302 x 332 mm (11.9 x 13.1 in)B&W ASW608 front: 261 x 272 mm (10.3 x 10.7 in)Focal Cub3302 × 332 mmB&W ASW608261 × 272 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTFocal Cub3 footprint: 302 x 355 mm (11.9 x 14 in)B&W ASW608 footprint: 261 x 350 mm (10.3 x 13.8 in)Focal Cub3302 × 355 mmB&W ASW608261 × 350 mm
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.

Focal Cub3 needs about 17% more floor area. Focal Cub3 is 60mm taller.

Focal Cub3 vs B&W ASW608 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Focal Cub3 Bowers & Wilkins ASW608
Brand Focal Bowers Wilkins
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 150 watts 200 watts
Frequency Response 40-150 Hz 32-140 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 150-watt RMS 200-watt RMS
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 8" 8"
Woofer Composition Polyflex Paper/Aramid Fiber
Woofer Surround Material n/a Rubber
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction bottom front
Physical Specs
Height 332.0mm (13.1") 272.0mm (10.7")
Width 302.0mm (11.9") 261.0mm (10.3")
Depth 355.0mm (14") 350.0mm (13.8")
Weight 10.09kg (22.2lbs) 8.86kg (19.5lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Acoustic Suspension
Grille n/a Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Other
Parts Warranty 3 Years 2 Years
Labor Warranty 3 Years 2 Years

Verdict

A ported subwoofer against a sealed one. That is the most consequential line on this page: it decides how the bass rolls off, how it behaves in a small room, and how much output you get for the size of the box.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass depthBB&W ASW608 goes deeper - 32Hz against 40Hz. A real difference, though most music has little content below 40Hz.
Amplifier powerBB&W ASW608 has the bigger amplifier - 200W against 150W RMS, about 1.2dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting.
Driver areaevenly matchedNear-identical radiating area (8" against 8").
EnclosuredependsFocal Cub3 is ported - a ported box gives more output low down for its size, at the cost of a steeper roll-off below tuning; B&W ASW608 is sealed - a sealed box rolls off gently and is usually the easier one to integrate in a small or awkward room. Neither is better in the abstract; ported tends to suit films and sealed tends to suit music, and both generalisations have exceptions.
Speaker-level inputsBB&W ASW608 takes a speaker-level connection as well as line level. That is what lets it work with an integrated amplifier or a vintage receiver that has no subwoofer output at all.
Driver placementdependsFocal Cub3 fires down and B&W ASW608 fires front. A down-firing driver is more forgiving of a grille-less look and of a hard floor; a front-firing one is the safer choice on a thick carpet or a suspended timber floor.
Cabinet sizedependsB&W ASW608 is about 30% smaller by volume. In a subwoofer that is a real trade rather than a preference: box volume is how you get output low down without a bigger amplifier.
WarrantyAFocal Cub3 carries 3 years on parts against 2 years. A subwoofer amplifier works harder than anything else in the system, so this is not a throwaway line.
PriceAFocal Cub3 costs less - $261 against $599, about 56% less.

A Focal Cub3  B B&W ASW608
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: B&W ASW608 measures better, Focal Cub3 costs about 56% less. In a normal room, placement will make a bigger difference than the gap between these two. Films or music? If this is mainly a home cinema, Focal Cub3 will hit harder for the money; if it is mainly for music in a normal-sized room, B&W ASW608 is usually the easier one to make sound right. Check your amplifier first: if it has no subwoofer or preamp output, B&W ASW608 is the only one of these two you can connect at all.

One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.


Latest Powered Subwoofers
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
16-inch Woofer | 14.5-175 Hz | 800 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
14-inch Woofer | 15-180 Hz | 500 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
12-inch Woofer | 17-160 Hz | 400 watts
DALI BASIK SUB
DALI BASIK SUB
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Bluesound PULSE SUB
6.5-inch Woofer | | 350 watts
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts
Revel Performa4 B140
Revel Performa4 B140
10-inch Woofer | 26-150 Hz | 750 watts
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
9-inch Woofer | 20-230 Hz | 1200 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 15
MartinLogan Grotto 15
15-inch Woofer | 20-120 Hz | 1000 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 12
MartinLogan Grotto 12
12-inch Woofer | 22-120 Hz | 1000 watts

This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction