SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND
ELAC Varro PS250-BK vs Klipsch Reference R-101SW Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

ELAC Varro PS250-BK

Powered Subwoofer | 27-150 Hz

ELAC Varro PS250-BK
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Klipsch R-101SW

Powered Subwoofer | 29.5-160 Hz

Klipsch Reference R-101SW
CHECK PRICE
ELAC Varro PS250-BK ELAC Varro PS250-BK
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-101SW Klipsch R-101SW
See at AMAZON
ELAC Varro PS250-BK
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-101SW
See at AMAZON
ELAC Varro PS250-BK vs Klipsch R-101SW Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Varro PS250-BK and R-101SW, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from ELAC and Klipsch. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of ELAC Varro PS250-BK and Klipsch R-101SW first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

ELAC Varro PS250-BK Key Specs

  • 10" Treated paper Woofer
  • 27-150 Hz Frequency Response
  • 250 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • App Control Feature
  • Weight:16.44kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 381.0" x 14-3/16" x 14-3/16"( 381.0 x 361.0 x 361.0mm )

Klipsch R-101SW Key Specs

  • 10" Spun-Copper TCP Woofer
  • 29.5-160 Hz Frequency Response
  • 150 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:13.91kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 370.0" x 14-1/16" x 20-13/16"( 370.0 x 358.0 x 529.0mm )

In the following sections, we will get into details in order to better understand how the ELAC Varro PS250-BK and Klipsch R-101SW compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these subwoofers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.ELAC Varro PS250-BKand Klipsch R-101SW have the same driver set up: Both subwoofers have 1 x 10" drivers.

Frequency Response

Varro PS250-BK has a frequency range of 27-150 Hz whereas R-101SW has a frequency range of 29.5-160 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 27Hz, the Varro PS250-BK can go slightly deeper then the R-101SW's min frequency of 30Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

ELAC Varro PS250-BK
Klipsch R-101SW
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

ELAC Varro PS250-BK
Klipsch R-101SW
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

Both ELAC Varro PS250-BK and Klipsch R-101SW have Bass Reflex type cabinets. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs.

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare ELAC Varro PS250-BK's and Klipsch R-101SW's external dimensions. ELAC Varro PS250-BK has external dimensions of 381.0 x 361.0 x 361.0mm ( 15inch x 14-3/16inch x 14-3/16inch ) whereas Klipsch R-101SW has external dimensions of 370.0 x 358.0 x 529.0mm ( 14-9/16inch x 14-1/16inch x 20-13/16inch ) .

Klipsch R-101SW is 3mm narrower and 11mm shorter than ELAC Varro PS250-BK but it is also 168mm deeper.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of ELAC Varro PS250-BK and Klipsch R-101SW in scale.

ELAC Varro PS250-BK vs Klipsch R-101SW Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of ELAC Varro PS250-BK and Klipsch R-101SW Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the ELAC Varro PS250-BK is approximately 1303.2cm2 / 202.0inch2 and base area of the Klipsch R-101SW is approximately 1893.8cm2 / 293.5inch2. The Varro PS250-BK requires 31% less surface area than the R-101SW which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The ELAC Varro PS250-BK weighs 16.44kg / 36.2lbs and the Klipsch R-101SW weighs 13.91kg / 30.6lbs. This makes the Varro PS250-BK 18% heavier than the R-101SW.

Here is a comparison of how Varro PS250-BK and R-101SW's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
ELAC Varro PS250-BK
Klipsch R-101SW
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of ELAC Varro PS250-BK?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Varro PS250-BK:
  • Grill
  • Power Cord
  • 4 Spikes
  • What's in the Box of Klipsch R-101SW?

    Here are the items that come with the R-101SW:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • Grille
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information

  • Reasons to choose ELAC Varro PS250-BK over Klipsch Reference R-101SW
    Low Frequency Response 27 Hz vs 30 Hz Generates deeper bass
    App-Based Control iOS,Android vs None Control the speaker via an app
    Base Surface Area 1303cm2 vs 1893cm2 Takes less floor space
    Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference R-101SW over ELAC Varro PS250-BK
    High Frequency Response 160k Hz vs 150k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Height 370mm vs 381mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Price per pair* 499USD vs 649USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    ELAC Varro PS250-BK vs Klipsch R-101SW Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General ELAC Varro PS250-BK Klipsch Reference R-101SW
    Brand ELAC Klipsch
    Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
    Max Amplifier Output 250 watts 150 watts
    Frequency Response 27-150 Hz 29.5-160 Hz
    Amplifier
    Watts RMS (Continuous) 250-watt RMS 150-watt RMS
    Watts Peak (Max) 500-watt RMS n/a
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 1 1
    Woofer Size 10" 10"
    Woofer Composition Treated paper Spun-Copper TCP
    Tweeter Size - -
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No No
    Firing Direction bottom front
    Physical Specs
    Height 381.0mm (15") 370.0mm (14.6")
    Width 361.0mm (14.2") 358.0mm (14.1")
    Depth 361.0mm (14.2") 529.0mm (20.8")
    Weight 16.44kg (36.2lbs) 13.91kg (30.6lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
    Finish MDF n/a
    Available Colors Black n/a
    Grille Yes Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    USB Port USB-A port for firmware updates n/a
    Other
    Parts Warranty 1 year 2 Years
    Labor Warranty 1 year 2 Years

    Latest Powered Subwoofers
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    12-inch Woofer | 22-250 Hz | 300 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    10-inch Woofer | 28-250 Hz | 200 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    8-inch Woofer | 32-180 Hz | 100 watts
    JBL Stage 220P
    JBL Stage 220P
    12-inch Woofer | 29-150 Hz | 250 watts
    JBL Stage 200P
    JBL Stage 200P
    10-inch Woofer | 32-150 Hz | 150 watts
    KEF KC92
    KEF KC92
    9-inch Woofer | 11-200 Hz | 1000 watts
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    15-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    12-inch Woofer | 22-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    10-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    8-inch Woofer | 34-140 Hz | 300 watts

    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction