SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Powered Subwoofers
  3. Bluesound PULSE SUB vs KEF KC62
Bluesound PULSE SUB vs KEF KC62 Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Bluesound PULSE SUB

Powered Subwoofer |

Bluesound PULSE SUB
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
KEF KC62

Powered Subwoofer | 11-200 Hz

KEF KC62
Check price atAmazon›
Bluesound PULSE SUB Bluesound PULSE SUB
Check price atAmazon›
KEF KC62 KEF KC62
Check price atAmazon›
Bluesound PULSE SUB
See at AMAZON
KEF KC62
See at AMAZON

Bluesound PULSE SUB vs KEF KC62 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing PULSE SUB and KC62, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Bluesound and KEF. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Bluesound PULSE SUB and KEF KC62 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsBluesound PULSE SUBKEF KC62
BrandBluesound
Canada · founded 2013
KEF
United Kingdom · founded 1961
Driver2 x 6.5"2 x 6.5"
Amplifier—1000 watts RMS
Enclosure—Sealed
Frequency response—11-200 Hz
App controlYes—
Weight10.00kg / 22lbs14.05kg / 30.9lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)13" x 11-1/2" x 12-3/8"
330 x 292 x 315 mm
9-5/8" x 10-1/8" x 11-1/16"
245.0 x 258.0 x 281.0mm
Woofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Woofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
KEF KC62

Woofer

Drivers drawn to scale and directly comparable. Cabinet outlines are indicative: full dimensions are not published for both. Hover a driver for its size.

The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Bluesound PULSE SUBand KEF KC62 have the same driver set up: Both subwoofers have 2 x 6.5" drivers.

Frequency Response

PULSE SUB has a frequency range of whereas KC62 has a frequency range of 11-200 Hz. With a minimum frequency of Hz, the PULSE SUB can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the KC62's min frequency of 11Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Bluesound PULSE SUB
KEF KC62
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Bluesound PULSE SUB
KEF KC62
Min
Average
Max

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Bluesound PULSE SUB's and KEF KC62's external dimensions. Bluesound PULSE SUB has external dimensions of 330 x 292 x 315 mm () whereas KEF KC62 has external dimensions of 245.0 x 258.0 x 281.0mm (9-5/8inch x 10-1/8inch x 11-1/16inch).

Bluesound PULSE SUB is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 34mm wider, 85mm taller and 34mm deeper than KEF KC62.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTBluesound PULSE SUB front: 292 x 330 mm (11.5 x 13 in)KEF KC62 front: 258 x 245 mm (10.2 x 9.6 in)Bluesound PULSE SUB292 × 330 mmKEF KC62258 × 245 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTBluesound PULSE SUB footprint: 292 x 315 mm (11.5 x 12.4 in)KEF KC62 footprint: 258 x 281 mm (10.2 x 11.1 in)Bluesound PULSE SUB292 × 315 mmKEF KC62258 × 281 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

Bluesound PULSE SUB needs about 27% more floor or shelf area. Bluesound PULSE SUB is 34mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. Bluesound PULSE SUB is 85mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Bluesound PULSE SUB is approximately 919.8cm2 / 142.6inch2 and base area of the KEF KC62 is approximately 725.0cm2 / 112.4inch2. The PULSE SUB requires 27% more surface area than the KC62 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Bluesound PULSE SUB weighs 10.00kg / 22lbs and the KEF KC62 weighs 14.05kg / 30.9lbs. This makes the KC62 41% heavier than the PULSE SUB.

Here is a comparison of how PULSE SUB and KC62's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Bluesound PULSE SUB
KEF KC62
Min
Average
Max

Reasons to choose Bluesound PULSE SUB over KEF KC62
Low Frequency Response Hz vs 11 Hz Generates deeper bass
App-Based Control BluOS Controller (iOS, Android, Windows, macOS) vs None Control the speaker via an app
Price per pair* 1299USD vs 1500USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Ethernet Connection Yes vs No High quality streaming over Ethernet
Reasons to choose KEF KC62 over Bluesound PULSE SUB
High Frequency Response 200 Hz vs Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 245mm vs 330mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 725cm2 vs 919cm2 Takes less floor space

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTBluesound PULSE SUB front: 292 x 330 mm (11.5 x 13 in)KEF KC62 front: 258 x 245 mm (10.2 x 9.6 in)Bluesound PULSE SUB292 × 330 mmKEF KC62258 × 245 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTBluesound PULSE SUB footprint: 292 x 315 mm (11.5 x 12.4 in)KEF KC62 footprint: 258 x 281 mm (10.2 x 11.1 in)Bluesound PULSE SUB292 × 315 mmKEF KC62258 × 281 mm
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.

Bluesound PULSE SUB needs about 27% more floor area. Bluesound PULSE SUB stands 34mm further into the room. Bluesound PULSE SUB is 85mm taller.

Bluesound PULSE SUB vs KEF KC62 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Bluesound PULSE SUB KEF KC62
Brand Bluesound KEF
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Frequency Response 11-200 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 350-watt RMS 1000-watt RMS
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 2
Woofer Size 6.5" 6.5"
Woofer Composition
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction n/a side
Physical Specs
Height 330.0mm (13") 245.0mm (9.6")
Width 292.0mm (11.5") 258.0mm (10.2")
Depth 315.0mm (12.4") 281.0mm (11.1")
Weight 10.00kg (22lbs) 14.05kg (30.9lbs)
Enclosure Acoustic Suspension
Finish Matte satin paint n/a
Available Colors Black, White/Tan n/a
Grille Removable magnetic n/a
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Ethernet Port Yes n/a
Other
Parts Warranty 2 Years
Labor Warranty 2 Years

Verdict

No single best subwoofer here. Your room, where the box can physically go, and whether this is mainly for films or mainly for music will settle it long before the specs do.

AreaBetterWhy
Amplifier powerBKEF KC62 has the bigger amplifier - 1000W against 350W RMS, about 4.6dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting.
Driver areaevenly matchedNear-identical radiating area (2 x 6.5" against 2 x 6.5").
Cabinet sizedependsKEF KC62 is about 41% smaller by volume. In a subwoofer that is a real trade rather than a preference: box volume is how you get output low down without a bigger amplifier.
PriceABluesound PULSE SUB costs less - $1,299 against $1,500, about 13% less.

A Bluesound PULSE SUB  B KEF KC62
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: KEF KC62 measures better, Bluesound PULSE SUB costs about 13% less. In a normal room, placement will make a bigger difference than the gap between these two. If placement is the constraint - a corner, behind a sofa, under a desk - KEF KC62 is the one that will actually go there, and a well-placed small subwoofer beats a badly-placed big one every time.

One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.


Latest Powered Subwoofers
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
16-inch Woofer | 14.5-175 Hz | 800 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
14-inch Woofer | 15-180 Hz | 500 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
12-inch Woofer | 17-160 Hz | 400 watts
DALI BASIK SUB
DALI BASIK SUB
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Bluesound PULSE SUB
6.5-inch Woofer | | 350 watts
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts
Revel Performa4 B140
Revel Performa4 B140
10-inch Woofer | 26-150 Hz | 750 watts
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
9-inch Woofer | 20-230 Hz | 1200 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 15
MartinLogan Grotto 15
15-inch Woofer | 20-120 Hz | 1000 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 12
MartinLogan Grotto 12
12-inch Woofer | 22-120 Hz | 1000 watts

This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction