SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND

Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB vs KEF R5 Meta Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB

Passive Floorstanding | 30-50k Hz

Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
KEF R5 Meta

Passive Floor-standing | 52-28k Hz

KEF R5 Meta
CHECK PRICE
Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407...
See at AMAZON
KEF R5 Meta KEF R5 Meta
See at AMAZON
Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407...
See at AMAZON
KEF R5 Meta
See at AMAZON
Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB vs KEF R5 Meta Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB and R5 Meta, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from ELAC and KEF.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB and KEF R5 Meta first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB Key Specs

  • 3-way Design
  • " JET 6 AMT Tweeter
  • 2 x 6" AS XR cone Woofer
  • 30-50k Hz Frequency Response
  • 88 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 4ohms
  • Power Range:Up to 170watts
  • Weight:19.10kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 1000.0" x 9" x 10.5"( 1000 x 229 x 266 mm )

KEF R5 Meta Key Specs

  • 3-way Design
  • 12th Generation Uni-Q Driver
  • 1" Vented dome Tweeter
  • 5" Midrange
  • 2 x 5.25" Hybrid Aluminum Woofer
  • 5" Midrange
  • 52-28k Hz Frequency Response
  • 87 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 4ohms
  • Power Range:15-200watts
  • Weight:24.55kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 1074.0" x 10-3/4" x 13-1/2"( 1074.0 x 274.0 x 343.0mm )

What size room are the Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB and KEF R5 Meta speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB KEF R5 Meta
Near-field Bad Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Average Average

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB and KEF R5 Meta compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB and R5 Meta are 3-way speakers.

Driver Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB KEF R5 Meta
Driver Setup 3-way 3-way
Tweeter -inch 1-inch
Midrange - 1 x 5-inch
Woofer 2 x 6-inch 2 x 5.25-inch

Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB features a " JET 6 AMT Tweeter and 2 x 6" AS XR cone Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 450Hz and 2400 Hz. On the other hand, the R5 Meta features a 1" Aluminum with MAT absorber Vented dome Tweeter , a 5" Midrange and 2 x 5.25" Hybrid Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 400Hz and 2700Hz.

Frequency Response

Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB has a frequency range of 30-50k Hz whereas R5 Meta has a frequency range of 52-28k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 30Hz, the Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R5 Meta's min frequency of 52Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB
R5 Meta
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB
KEF R5 Meta
Min
Average
Max

None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB and R5 Meta have the same Impedance of 4 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB sensitivity is rated at 88 dB and the R5 Meta's is at 87 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF R5 Meta, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

One thing to keep in mind that the lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit comared to higher impedance speakers especially at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB and the Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB can provide this impedance level.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB
R5 Meta
Min
Average
Max

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.

Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB can handle a max power of 200 watts RMS from the amp the whereas Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB has a max power handling value of 170 watts RMS , 30 watts less than the R5 Meta.

Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB has a bottom firing port whereas R5 Meta has a rear firing ports. Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB's bottom-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to KEF R5 Meta with its rear-firing port.

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB's and KEF R5 Meta's external dimensions. Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB has external dimensions of 1000 x 229 x 266 mm ( 40 x 9 x 10.47 inches) whereas KEF R5 Meta has external dimensions of 1074.0 x 274.0 x 343.0mm ( 42-1/4-inch x 10-3/4-inch x 13-1/2-inch) .

KEF R5 Meta is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 45mm wider, 74mm taller and 77mm deeper than Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB is approximately 609.1cm2 / 94.4inch2 and base area of the KEF R5 Meta is approximately 939.8cm2 / 145.7inch2. The Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB requires 35% less surface area than the R5 Meta which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

What's in the Box of KEF R5 Meta?

Here are the items that come with the R5 Meta:
  • R5 Meta
  • Microfiber grille
  • Plinth and spike accessories
  • Port bungs
  • User manual and warranty information

  • Reasons to choose Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB over KEF R5 Meta
    Sensitivity 88 dB vs 87 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
    Woofer Size 6 inches vs 5.25 inches Larger woofer
    Low Frequency Response 30 Hz vs 52 Hz Generates deeper bass
    High Frequency Response 50k Hz vs 28k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Height 1000mm vs 1074mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 609cm2 vs 939cm2 Takes less floor space

    Reasons to choose KEF R5 Meta over Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB

    Max Input Power 200 watts vs 170 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
    Price per pair* 3998USD vs 5999USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB vs KEF R5 Meta Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General Elac Vela 2.0 VFS407.2-GB KEF R5 Meta
    Brand ELAC KEF
    Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
    Power Range Up to 170 watts 15-200 watts
    Sensitivity 88 dB 87 dB
    Impedance 4 ohms 4 ohms
    Impedance 3.2 ohms 3.2 ohms
    Frequency Response 30-50k Hz 52-28k Hz
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 2 2
    Woofer Size 6" 5.25"
    Woofer Composition AS XR cone Hybrid Aluminum
    Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
    Tweeter Size - 1"
    Tweeter Type JET 6 AMT Vented dome
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No 5"
    Crossover Frequency 450Hz and 2400 Hz 400Hz and 2700Hz
    Firing Direction bottom rear
    Physical Specs
    Height 1000.0mm (39.4") 1074.0mm (42.3")
    Width 229.0mm (9") 274.0mm (10.8")
    Depth 266.0mm (10.5") 343.0mm (13.5")
    Weight 19.10kg (42lbs) 24.55kg (54lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
    Available Colors Black High Gloss, White High Gloss, Walnut High Gloss Black Gloss, White Gloss, Walnut
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Biamp Inputs n/a Yes
    Other
    Parts Warranty 5 years
    Labor Warranty 5 years

    Most Popular Speakers
    Klipsch Reference R-51M
    Klipsch R-51M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
    B&W 606 S2
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    KEF Q150
    KEF Q150
    2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
    Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
    Klipsch RP-500M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606
    B&W 606
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction