SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Amplifiers
  3. Emotiva BasX TA2+ vs NAD C 389
Emotiva BasX TA2+ vs NAD C 389
x
Amp to replace
Change

Emotiva BasX TA2+

Stereo Receiver | 135 watts RMS into 8-ohms

Emotiva BasX TA2+
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
NAD C 389

Integrated Amplifier | 130 watts RMS into 8-ohms

NAD C 389
Check price atAmazon›
Emotiva BasX TA2+ Emotiva BasX TA2+
Check price atAmazon›
NAD C 389 NAD C 389
Check price atAmazon›
Emotiva BasX TA2+
See at AMAZON
NAD C 389
See at AMAZON

Emotiva BasX TA2+ vs NAD C 389 Integrated Amplifier Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing BasX TA2+ and C 389, two s from Emotiva and NAD. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Emotiva BasX TA2+ and NAD C 389 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsEmotiva BasX TA2+NAD C 389
BrandEmotiva
United States · founded 2003
NAD
Canada · founded 1972
Power135 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms with both channels driven, and 250 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms130 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 130 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms
Amplifier classClass A/BClass D
Built-in DACYesYes
Phono inputYesYes
Headphone outputYes1/4
BluetoothYesYes
Weight11.34kg / 24.9lbs8.70kg / 19.1lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)4" x 17" x 15-1/2"
101.6 x 431.8 x 393.7 mm
3-15/16" x 17-1/8" x 15-7/16"
100 x 435 x 392 mm

What size room are the Emotiva BasX TA2+ and NAD C 389 Amplifiers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these amplifiers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their max power parameters:

Listening Environment Emotiva BasX TA2+ NAD C 389
Near-field Poor Poor
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Good Good
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Average Average

The rest of this page covers where each one wins, how they compare in size, their inputs and outputs, the full specifications and a verdict.


Reasons to choose Emotiva BasX TA2+ over NAD C 389
MSRP Price(*) 1,299USD vs 1,999USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Full-color Display Yes vs No Displays Album and device Info
Watts into 8-ohms 135 watts vs 130 watts Delivers higher power into 8-ohms speakers
Watts into 4-ohms 250 watts vs 130 watts Delivers higher power into 4-ohms speakers
Signal to Noise Ratio 120 dB vs 95 dB Higher ratings results in cleaner sound
Total Analog Inputs 4 vs 3 More options for connecting Analog sources
Optical Digital Inputs Yes vs 2 More options for connecting Digital sources
Coaxial Digital Inputs Yes vs 2 More options for connecting Digital sources
Base Surface Area 1700.0cm2/ 263.5inch2 vs 1705.0cm2/ 264.3inch2 takes less space in your room
Radio Tuner AM/FM vs Not stated Built-in radio, so no extra box for broadcast listening

Reasons to choose NAD C 389 over Emotiva BasX TA2+
Height 100mm vs 101mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTEmotiva BasX TA2+ front: 432 x 102 mm (17 x 4 in)NAD C 389 front: 435 x 100 mm (17.1 x 3.9 in)Emotiva BasX TA2+432 × 102 mmNAD C 389435 × 100 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTEmotiva BasX TA2+ footprint: 432 x 394 mm (17 x 15.5 in)NAD C 389 footprint: 435 x 392 mm (17.1 x 15.4 in)Emotiva BasX TA2+432 × 394 mmNAD C 389435 × 392 mm
Both amplifiers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, aligned at the back panels the way they would sit against a wall, so the deeper one visibly stands further out.

Near-identical footprints.

Inputs and Outputs

The input and output selections that are offered is an important factor when comparing two amplifiers. Here you can find how the I/O selections of the Emotiva BasX TA2+ and NAD C 389 differs from each other.

Emotiva BasX TA2+ Inputs
  • Total Number of Analog Inputs: 4
  • RCA Line Input
  • Phono Input
  • Yes Optical Digital Input
  • Yes Coaxial Digital Input
  • USB Input:
  • XLR Input Port
NAD C 389 Inputs
  • Total Number of Analog Inputs: 3
  • Phono Input
  • 2 Optical Digital Input
  • 2 Coaxial Digital Input
  • USB Input:
    • USB-A(Service Only)
  • HDMI eARC
Outputs
  • Stereo RCA pre out Preamp Outputs
  • Yes Headphone Output
  • Subwoofer Output
Outputs
  • Stereo RCA, Sub Preamp Outputs
  • 1/4 Headphone Output
  • Subwoofer Output

Balanced connections

Emotiva BasX TA2+ has balanced XLR connections and NAD C 389 does not. A balanced cable carries the signal twice, on two conductors of opposite polarity. Interference picked up along the way lands on both equally and cancels when the two are recombined at the far end, so the longer the cable run and the noisier the surroundings, the more it is worth. Whether it also yields more power depends on how the amplifier is built inside - some are balanced end to end, others convert to single-ended internally and deliver the same either way.

NAD C 389 Back View
NAD C 389 Back View (Click the image for the larger version)

Emotiva BasX TA2+ vs NAD C 389 full specifications

Every spec we hold for both, side by side
SpecificationEmotiva BasX TA2+NAD C 389
Overview
BrandEmotivaNAD
TypeIntegrated Amplifier with built-in DACIntegrated Amplifier with built-in DAC
Channels22
Amplifier classClass A/BClass D
Output devicesSolid StateSolid State
Released2024May 2022
Made inUSA–
List price$1,299$1,999
SeriesBasXClassic
Power and performance
Power into 8 ohms135 W RMS130 W RMS
Power into 4 ohms250 W RMS130 W RMS
Power, as rated135 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms with both channels driven, and 250 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms130 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms and 130 watts x 2 channels into 4 ohms
Minimum impedance4 ohms4 ohms
Signal-to-noise ratio120 dB95 dB
THD–0.02%
Frequency bandwidth20 Hz-50 kHz20 Hz-20 kHz
Digital and DAC
Built-in DACYesYes
DAC chip–ESS Sabre ES9028
Max bit depth–32-bit
Max sample rate–384 kHz
Network and streaming
Wi-FiNo–
EthernetNoNo
BluetoothYesYes
Bluetooth codecs–AptX,AAC,SBC
Bluetooth transmitter–Yes
AirPlay 2–No
Chromecast–No
Roon–No
BluOS–No
HEOS–No
DTS Play-Fi–No
Inputs
Analogue inputs43
RCA inputsYes–
XLR inputsYes–
Phono inputYesYes
Phono typeMM and MC, 47k ohm MM, selectable 47 or 100 ohm MCMM
Optical digitalYes2
Coaxial digitalYes2
USB inputYesYes
USB type–USB-A(Service Only)
HDMI inputNoYes
HDMI ARC / eARC–eARC
Outputs
Preamp outputsStereo RCA pre outStereo RCA, Sub
Pre-out / main-in loop–No
Subwoofer outputYesYes
Headphone outputYes1/4
Speaker terminalsBinding posts–
A/B speaker terminals–Yes
Features and control
DisplayYes–
Tone controlsYes–
CD playerNoNo
Radio tunerAM/FM–
Handheld remoteYesYes
Physical
Dimensions (H x W x D)101.6 x 431.8 x 393.7 mm100 x 435 x 392 mm
Dimensions, inches4 x 17 x 15-1/2 inch3-15/16 x 7-1/8 x 15-7/16 inch
Weight11.34 kg (25.00 lbs)8.70 kg (19.10 lbs)
FinishesBlackBlack
Removable power cordYesIEC 3-prong
Parts warranty–2 Years
Labour warranty–2 Years

A dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure, or it does not apply. 60 specifications compared.

Verdict

No single best amplifier here. What decides it is what you have to drive, what you need to plug in, and how much of the system you want in one box.

AreaBetterWhy
Powerevenly matchedEffectively the same output - 135W against 130W into 8 ohms is under 1dB, which is not an audible difference in loudness.
Grip on hard loadsAEmotiva BasX TA2+ holds up better into a 4-ohm load: its output nearly doubles to 250W, where the other barely increases. That matters with demanding speakers far more than the 8-ohm figure does.
Noise floorAEmotiva BasX TA2+ is the quieter design on paper - 120dB against 95dB. Audible mainly with sensitive speakers in a quiet room.
Built-in DACevenly matchedBoth have a DAC on board with much the same capability.
Analogue inputsAEmotiva BasX TA2+ takes more analogue sources - 4 against 3.
Use with a TVdependsOnly NAD C 389 has HDMI eARC, so the television can drive it directly and one remote controls the volume. If the system is for music only, this changes nothing.
Room to growevenly matchedThe same expansion options on both.
Amplifier classdependsEmotiva BasX TA2+ is Class A/B and NAD C 389 is Class D. Class A/B runs warm and is the long-established mainstream choice; Class D runs cool and draws almost nothing at idle. Modern examples of both measure well - judge by the rest of the page.
PriceAEmotiva BasX TA2+ costs less - $1,299 against $1,999 at list.
Watts per dollarAEmotiva BasX TA2+ is the cheaper watt - about $10 per watt against $15. A blunt measure, and it says nothing about how either sounds, but it is the honest one for raw output.

A Emotiva BasX TA2+  B NAD C 389
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Emotiva BasX TA2+ is the easier recommendation: it leads on most of the measured areas and costs less. Take NAD C 389 if one of the "depends" rows above describes your system. If your speakers are a difficult load - 4 ohms nominal, big woofers, or a sensitivity in the low 80s - Emotiva BasX TA2+ is the safer partner, because how an amplifier behaves when the impedance drops matters more than its 8-ohm rating. If this sits under a television, NAD C 389 is the one to buy - HDMI ARC means the TV remote controls the volume and there is no second box in the way.

What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.

LATEST BLOG POSTS
Wharfedale Nova vs SW Subwoofers: What 450 to 800 Dollars More Buys
JBL Summit Makalu: 44,995 Dollars and 12 Times the Amplifier of the Everest
NAD M33 V2 vs M33: Same 200 Watts, and 48 Percent More Than in 2020
PSB iQ2 vs iQ1: What 400 Dollars Buys Is a Cable You Do Not Need
Bowers & Wilkins 800 D5 vs D4: Same Published Specs, 30 to 56 Percent More Money
Arcam's Cheapest New Receiver Costs 47 Percent More. It Is Also the Only One That Changed.
Triangle Borea BR04 vs BR03: 50 Dollars More Buys 2 Hz, Bi-Wiring and a Bigger Box
Marantz Cinema Series 2 Costs 200 Dollars More With the Same Power and Weight. Here Is What Changed.

Most Popular Amplifiers
Yamaha A-S301
Yamaha A-S301
60 watts into 8-ohms
Audiolab 7000A
Audiolab 7000A
70 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S801
Yamaha A-S801
100 watts into 8-ohms
Yamaha A-S501
Yamaha A-S501
85 watts into 8-ohms
Sonos Amp
Sonos Amp
125 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-900HNE
Denon PMA-900HNE
50 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-600NE
Denon PMA-600NE
45 watts into 8-ohms
WiiM Amp Pro
WiiM Amp Pro
60 watts into 8-ohms
Denon PMA-1700NE
Denon PMA-1700NE
70 watts into 8-ohms
Marantz PM6007
Marantz PM6007
45 watts into 8-ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction