SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Powered Subwoofers
  3. Polk PSW10 vs Klipsch R-100SW
Polk Audio PSW10 vs Klipsch R-100SW Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Polk PSW10

Powered Subwoofer | 40-160 Hz

Polk Audio PSW10
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Klipsch R-100SW

Powered Subwoofer | 32-120 Hz

Klipsch R-100SW
Check price atAmazon›
Polk PSW10 Polk PSW10
Check price atAmazon›
Klipsch R-100SW Klipsch R-100SW
Check price atAmazon›
Polk PSW10
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-100SW
See at AMAZON

Polk PSW10 vs Klipsch R-100SW Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing PSW10 and R-100SW, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Polk Audio and Klipsch. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Polk PSW10 and Klipsch R-100SW first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsPolk PSW10Klipsch R-100SW
BrandPolk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Klipsch
United States · founded 1946
Driver10" Polymer Composite10" Copper-spun IMG
Amplifier50 watts RMS150 watts RMS
EnclosurePortedPorted
Frequency response40-160 Hz32-120 Hz
Weight11.82kg / 26lbs10.91kg / 24lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)14-3/8" x 14" x 16-3/16"
366.0 x 356.0 x 412.0mm
14-5/8" x 12-9/16" x 18-1/16"
372.0 x 320.0 x 459.0mm
Woofer - 10 inch
Polk PSW10
Woofer - 10 inch
Klipsch R-100SW

Woofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

The sections below take each area in turn: driver and amplifier, frequency response, physical size and connectivity.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Polk PSW10and Klipsch R-100SW have the same driver set up: Both subwoofers have 1 x 10" drivers.

Frequency Response

PSW10 has a frequency range of 40-160 Hz whereas R-100SW has a frequency range of 32-120 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 32Hz, the R-100SW can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the PSW10's min frequency of 40Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Polk PSW10
Klipsch R-100SW
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Polk PSW10
Klipsch R-100SW
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The Polk PSW10 has a Bass Reflex type cabinet. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs. On the other hand the Klipsch R-100SW have Bass reflex type enclosure.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Polk PSW10's and Klipsch R-100SW's external dimensions. Polk PSW10 has external dimensions of 366.0 x 356.0 x 412.0mm (14-3/8 x 14 x 16-3/16inch) whereas Klipsch R-100SW has external dimensions of 372.0 x 320.0 x 459.0mm (14-5/8 x 12-9/16 x 18-1/16inch).

Polk PSW10 is 6mm shorter and 47mm less deeper than Klipsch R-100SW but it is also 36mm wider.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Polk PSW10 and Klipsch R-100SW in scale.

Polk PSW10 vs Klipsch R-100SW Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Polk PSW10 and Klipsch R-100SW Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Polk PSW10 is approximately 1466.7cm2 / 227.3inch2 and base area of the Klipsch R-100SW is approximately 1468.8cm2 / 227.7inch2. The PSW10 requires 0% less surface area than the R-100SW which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Polk PSW10 weighs 11.82kg / 26lbs and the Klipsch R-100SW weighs 10.91kg / 24lbs. This makes the PSW10 8% heavier than the R-100SW.

Here is a comparison of how PSW10 and R-100SW's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Polk PSW10
Klipsch R-100SW
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Polk PSW10?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of PSW10:
  • Black powered subwoofer
  • Grille
  • Owners Manual
  • Online registration card

What's in the Box of Klipsch R-100SW?

Here are the items that come with the R-100SW:
  • Powered sub
  • Grille (installed)
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose Polk Audio PSW10 over Klipsch R-100SW
High Frequency Response 160 Hz vs 120 Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 366mm vs 372mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 1466cm2 vs 1468cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 249USD vs 275USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Reasons to choose Klipsch R-100SW over Polk Audio PSW10
Low Frequency Response 32 Hz vs 40 Hz Generates deeper bass

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTPolk PSW10 front: 356 x 366 mm (14 x 14.4 in)Klipsch R-100SW front: 320 x 372 mm (12.6 x 14.6 in)Polk PSW10356 × 366 mmKlipsch R-100SW320 × 372 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTPolk PSW10 footprint: 356 x 412 mm (14 x 16.2 in)Klipsch R-100SW footprint: 320 x 459 mm (12.6 x 18.1 in)Polk PSW10356 × 412 mmKlipsch R-100SW320 × 459 mm
Both subwoofers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same floor and pushed back to the same wall, so the bigger one visibly takes more of the room.

Near-identical footprints. Klipsch R-100SW stands 47mm further into the room.

Polk PSW10 vs Klipsch R-100SW Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Polk Audio PSW10 Klipsch R-100SW
Brand Polk Audio Klipsch
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Max Amplifier Output 50 watts 150 watts
Frequency Response 40-160 Hz 32-120 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 50-watt RMS 150-watt RMS
Watts Peak (Max) n/a 300-watt RMS
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 10" 10"
Woofer Composition Polymer Composite Copper-spun IMG
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction front front
Physical Specs
Height 366.0mm (14.4") 372.0mm (14.6")
Width 356.0mm (14") 320.0mm (12.6")
Depth 412.0mm (16.2") 459.0mm (18.1")
Weight 11.82kg (26lbs) 10.91kg (24lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass reflex
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Other
Parts Warranty 3 Years 2 Years
Labor Warranty 3 Years 2 Years

Verdict

No single best subwoofer here. Your room, where the box can physically go, and whether this is mainly for films or mainly for music will settle it long before the specs do.

AreaBetterWhy
Bass depthBKlipsch R-100SW goes deeper - 32Hz against 40Hz. A real difference, though most music has little content below 40Hz.
Amplifier powerBKlipsch R-100SW has the bigger amplifier - 150W against 50W RMS, about 4.8dB more on tap. In a large room that is headroom before the DSP starts limiting.
Driver areaevenly matchedNear-identical radiating area (10" against 10").
Enclosureevenly matchedBoth are ported designs, so they roll off in much the same way.
Speaker-level inputsAPolk PSW10 takes a speaker-level connection as well as line level. That is what lets it work with an integrated amplifier or a vintage receiver that has no subwoofer output at all.
WarrantyAPolk PSW10 carries 3 years on parts against 2 years. A subwoofer amplifier works harder than anything else in the system, so this is not a throwaway line.
PriceAPolk PSW10 costs less - $249 against $275, about 9% less.

A Polk PSW10  B Klipsch R-100SW
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both subwoofers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Neither runs away with it - they trade advantages. Let your room size and where the box can actually stand settle it. Check your amplifier first: if it has no subwoofer or preamp output, Polk PSW10 is the only one of these two you can connect at all.

One thing outweighs everything above: where the subwoofer stands. Room modes can add or remove 10dB or more at a given seat, which is far larger than any difference on this page. Before spending more, try the sub in two or three positions - the crawl test, where you put it in the listening seat and crawl the room to find where the bass sounds best, costs nothing and usually beats an upgrade.


Latest Powered Subwoofers
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1600CSW
16-inch Woofer | 14.5-175 Hz | 800 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1400CSW
14-inch Woofer | 15-180 Hz | 500 watts
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-1200CSW
12-inch Woofer | 17-160 Hz | 400 watts
DALI BASIK SUB
DALI BASIK SUB
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Bluesound PULSE SUB
Bluesound PULSE SUB
6.5-inch Woofer | | 350 watts
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts
Revel Performa4 B140
Revel Performa4 B140
10-inch Woofer | 26-150 Hz | 750 watts
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
SVS 3000 Micro R Evolution
9-inch Woofer | 20-230 Hz | 1200 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 15
MartinLogan Grotto 15
15-inch Woofer | 20-120 Hz | 1000 watts
MartinLogan Grotto 12
MartinLogan Grotto 12
12-inch Woofer | 22-120 Hz | 1000 watts

This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction