SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Bookshelf Speakers
  3. Sonus faber Olympica I vs Wharfedale EVO5.2

Sonus faber Olympica I vs Wharfedale EVO5.2 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Sonus faber Olympica I

Passive Bookshelf | 57-40k Hz

Sonus faber Olympica I
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Wharfedale EVO5.2

Passive Bookshelf | 44-24k Hz

Wharfedale EVO5.2
Check price atAmazon›
Sonus faber Olympica I Sonus faber Olympica...
Check price atAmazon›
Wharfedale EVO5.2 Wharfedale EVO5.2
Check price atAmazon›
Sonus faber Olympica...
See at AMAZON
Wharfedale EVO5.2
See at AMAZON

Sonus faber Olympica I vs Wharfedale EVO5.2 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Olympica I and EVO5.2, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from Sonus faber and Wharfedale.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Sonus faber Olympica I and Wharfedale EVO5.2 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsSonus faber Olympica IWharfedale EVO5.2
BrandSonus faber
Italy · founded 1983
Wharfedale
United Kingdom · founded 1932
Design2-way3-way
Tweeter1.1" Soft-Dome1.375" AMT (Ribbon)
Midrange—2"
Woofer6.5" Paper6.5" woven Kevlar
Frequency response57-40k Hz44-24k Hz
Sensitivity87 dB88 dB
Impedance4 ohms4 ohms
Power range30-250 watts25-120 watts
Weight11.00kg / 24.2lbs15.05kg / 33.1lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)14-9/16" x 8-1/4" x 14-9/16"
370.0 x 210.0 x 370.0mm
19.6" x 10.2" x 15.4"
497.0 x 260.0 x 391.0mm

What size room are the Sonus faber Olympica I and Wharfedale EVO5.2 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Sonus faber Olympica I Wharfedale EVO5.2
Near-field Good Poor
Small Room Good Average
Mid-size Room Average Good
Large Room Poor Average
Very Large Room No way Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that Olympica I is a 2-way design whereas the EVO5.2 is a 3-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Tweeter - 1.1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Sonus faber Olympica I
Tweeter - 1.38 inchMidrange - 2 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Wharfedale EVO5.2

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Sonus faber Olympica I Wharfedale EVO5.2
Driver Setup 2-way 3-way
Tweeter 1.1-inch 1.375-inch
Midrange - 1 x 2-inch
Woofer 1 x 6.5-inch 1 x 6.5-inch

Olympica I features a 1.1" Silk Soft-Dome Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" Paper Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2300 Hz. On the other hand, the EVO5.2 features a 1.375" SilentWeave cotton and felt damping fiber AMT (Ribbon) Tweeter, a 2" Midrange and 1 x 6.5" woven Kevlar Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 800 Hz and 4.3 kHz.

Sonus faber Olympica I driver frequency bandsSonus faber Olympica IWharfedale EVO5.257-2.3k44-800Woofer800-4.3kMidrange2.3k-40k4.3k-24kTweeter20501002005001k2k5k10k20k40kHz, log scale

Frequency Response

Olympica I has a frequency range of 57-40k Hz whereas EVO5.2 has a frequency range of 44-24k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 44Hz, the EVO5.2 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Olympica I's min frequency of 57Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Bookshelf class in our database.

Low Frequency

Bookshelf Speakers

Olympica I
EVO5.2
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Olympica I and EVO5.2 have the same Impedance of 4 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. Olympica I sensitivity is rated at 87 dB and the EVO5.2's is at 88 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the Wharfedale EVO5.2 a more sensitive speaker compared to Sonus faber Olympica I, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

One thing to keep in mind that the lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit comared to higher impedance speakers especially at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the Olympica I and the Olympica I can provide this impedance level.

Sensitivity

Bookshelf Speakers

Olympica I
EVO5.2
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Olympica I can handle a max power of 250 watts RMS, whereas EVO5.2 has a max power handling value of 120 watts RMS, 130 watts less than the Olympica I.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Sonus faber Olympica I
 
Wharfedale EVO5.2
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Olympica I features Binding post posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. EVO5.2 has a Binding post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Wharfedale EVO5.2 Terminals
Wharfedale EVO5.2's Binding post terminals

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Sonus faber Olympica I's and Wharfedale EVO5.2's external dimensions. Sonus faber Olympica I has external dimensions of 370.0 x 210.0 x 370.0mm (14-9/16 x 8-1/4 x 14-9/16inch) whereas Wharfedale EVO5.2 has external dimensions of 497.0 x 260.0 x 391.0mm (19.6" × 10.2" × 15.4").

Wharfedale EVO5.2 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 50mm wider, 127mm taller and 21mm deeper than Sonus faber Olympica I.

Size, drawn to scale

FRONTSonus faber Olympica I front: 210 x 370 mm (8.3 x 14.6 in)Wharfedale EVO5.2 front: 260 x 497 mm (10.2 x 19.6 in)Sonus faber Olympica I210 × 370 mmWharfedale EVO5.2260 × 497 mmTOP / FOOTPRINTSonus faber Olympica I footprint: 210 x 370 mm (8.3 x 14.6 in)Wharfedale EVO5.2 footprint: 260 x 391 mm (10.2 x 15.4 in)Sonus faber Olympica I210 × 370 mmWharfedale EVO5.2260 × 391 mm
Both speakers and both views share one scale, so everything here is directly comparable. Hover a box for its dimensions.

One scale for both, standing on the same surface and pushed back to the same wall, so the deeper one visibly sticks out further.

Wharfedale EVO5.2 needs about 31% more floor or shelf area. Wharfedale EVO5.2 is 21mm deeper, so it stands that much further out from the wall. Wharfedale EVO5.2 is 127mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Sonus faber Olympica I is approximately 777.0cm2 / 120.4inch2 and base area of the Wharfedale EVO5.2 is approximately 1016.6cm2 / 157.6inch2. The Olympica I requires 24% less surface area than the EVO5.2 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Sonus faber Olympica I weighs 11.00kg / 24.2lbs and the Wharfedale EVO5.2 weighs 15.05kg / 33.1lbs. This makes the EVO5.2 37% heavier than the Olympica I.

Here is a comparison of how Olympica I and EVO5.2's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Bookshelf class.

Weight
All Bookshelf Speakers
Sonus faber Olympica I
Wharfedale EVO5.2
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Wharfedale EVO5.2?

Here are the items that come with the EVO5.2:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles
  • 4 Jumper-bars (pre-installed)
  • 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • Pair of white cloth gloves
  • User Manual


Reasons to choose Sonus faber Olympica I over Wharfedale EVO5.2

Max Input Power 250 watts vs 120 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
High Frequency Response 40k Hz vs 24k Hz Generates higher frequency
Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections
Height 370mm vs 497mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 777cm2 vs 1016cm2 Takes less floor space

Reasons to choose Wharfedale EVO5.2 over Sonus faber Olympica I

Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Sensitivity 88 dB vs 87 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Low Frequency Response 44 Hz vs 57 Hz Generates deeper bass
Price per pair* 1799USD vs 6500USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Sonus faber Olympica I vs Wharfedale EVO5.2 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Sonus faber Olympica I Wharfedale EVO5.2
Brand Sonus faber Wharfedale
Speaker Type Bookshelf speakers Bookshelf speakers
Power Range 30-250 watts 25-120 watts
Sensitivity 87 dB 88 dB
Impedance 4 ohms 4 ohms
Impedance n/a 3.2 ohms
Frequency Response 57-40k Hz 44-24k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 6.5" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Paper woven Kevlar
Woofer Surround Material n/a Rubber
Tweeter Size 1.1" 1.375"
Tweeter Type Soft-Dome AMT (Ribbon)
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No 2"
Crossover Frequency 2300 Hz 800 Hz and 4.3 kHz
Firing Direction n/a bottom
Physical Specs
Height 370.0mm (14.6") 497.0mm (19.6")
Width 210.0mm (8.3") 260.0mm (10.2")
Depth 370.0mm (14.6") 391.0mm (15.4")
Weight 11.00kg (24.2lbs) 15.05kg (33.1lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish n/a MDF/Wood-veneer
Available Colors n/a Walnut, Grey. Black, White
Mounting Bracket No
Recommended Stand Height n/a 18-22"
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years

Verdict

These sit in different price classes - Sonus faber Olympica I costs roughly 3.6x what Wharfedale EVO5.2 does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBWharfedale EVO5.2 digs deeper - 44Hz against 57Hz.
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (87dB vs 88dB) - both want much the same power.
HeadroomASonus faber Olympica I takes more power (250W vs 120W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsSonus faber Olympica I is easier to place; Wharfedale EVO5.2 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilityASonus faber Olympica I: bi-amping.
PriceBWharfedale EVO5.2 is cheaper - $1,799 against $6,500, about 72% less; arguably a different class.

A Sonus faber Olympica I  B Wharfedale EVO5.2
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Sonus faber Olympica I is ahead, but only on 1 of the measured areas, and it costs about 3.6x the price. That is a lot of money for a narrow margin on paper - Wharfedale EVO5.2 looks like the sensible buy unless something else about the Sonus faber Olympica I appeals to you. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 57Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. Match it to your room: we rate Sonus faber Olympica I the better fit for near-field listening and a small room, and Wharfedale EVO5.2 for a mid-size room and a large room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction