SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND

KEF Reference 3 Meta vs GoldenEar Triton Five Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

KEF Reference 3 Meta

Passive Floor-standing | 43-35k Hz

KEF Reference 3 Meta
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
GoldenEar Triton Five

Passive Floor-standing | 26-35k Hz

GoldenEar Triton Five
CHECK PRICE
KEF Reference 3 Meta KEF Reference 3 Meta
See at AMAZON
GoldenEar Triton Five GoldenEar Triton Fiv...
See at AMAZON
KEF Reference 3 Meta
See at AMAZON
GoldenEar Triton Fiv...
See at AMAZON
KEF Reference 3 Meta vs GoldenEar Triton Five Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Reference 3 Meta and Triton Five, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from KEF and GoldenEar.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF Reference 3 Meta and GoldenEar Triton Five first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

KEF Reference 3 Meta Key Specs

  • 3-way Design
  • 12th Generation Uni-Q Driver
  • 1" aluminium dome with MAT Tweeter
  • 5" Midrange
  • 2 x 6.5" aluminium cone Woofer
  • 43-35k Hz Frequency Response
  • 86 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 4ohms
  • Power Range:50-300watts
  • Weight:51.30kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 1207.0" x 12.7" x 18.4"( 1207 x 323 x 467 mm )

GoldenEar Triton Five Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • " Folded Ribbon Tweeter
  • 2 x 6" Polypropylene Woofer
  • 26-35k Hz Frequency Response
  • 90 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:15-400watts
  • Weight:18.18kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 1131.0" x 11-1/16" x 16-9/16"( 1131.0 x 281.0 x 421.0mm )

What size room are the KEF Reference 3 Meta and GoldenEar Triton Five speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* KEF Reference 3 Meta GoldenEar Triton Five
Near-field Are you nuts? Are you nuts?
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Average Average
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Good Good

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the KEF Reference 3 Meta and GoldenEar Triton Five compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that Reference 3 Meta is a 3-way design whereas the Triton Five is a 2-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Driver KEF Reference 3 Meta GoldenEar Triton Five
Driver Setup 3-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch -inch
Midrange 1 x 5-inch -
Woofer 2 x 6.5-inch 2 x 6-inch

Reference 3 Meta features a 1" aluminium dome with MAT Tweeter , a 5" Midrange and 2 x 6.5" aluminium cone Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 450Hz and 2100Hz. On the other hand, the Triton Five features a " Folded Ribbon Tweeter and 2 x 6" Polypropylene Woofer .

Frequency Response

Reference 3 Meta has a frequency range of 43-35k Hz whereas Triton Five has a frequency range of 26-35k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 26Hz, the Triton Five can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Reference 3 Meta's min frequency of 43Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Reference 3 Meta
Triton Five
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

KEF Reference 3 Meta
GoldenEar Triton Five
Min
Average
Max

None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Reference 3 Meta is a 4 ohms speaker compared to the Triton Five which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the Reference 3 Meta can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. Reference 3 Meta sensitivity is rated at 86 dB and the Triton Five's is rated at 90 dB. This 4 dB difference makes the GoldenEar Triton Five a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF Reference 3 Meta, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

Reference 3 Meta
Triton Five
Min
Average
Max

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.

Reference 3 Meta can handle a max power of 400 watts RMS from the amp the whereas Reference 3 Meta has a max power handling value of 300 watts RMS , 100 watts less than the Triton Five.

Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Reference 3 Meta features Custom 5-way bi-wire tool-less binding posts posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. Triton Five has a 5-way Post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

KEF Reference 3 Meta Terminals
KEF Reference 3 Meta's Custom 5-way bi-wire tool-less binding posts terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both Reference 3 Meta and Triton Five have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.

If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.

KEF Reference 3 Meta  Port
KEF Reference 3 Meta Port

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare KEF Reference 3 Meta's and GoldenEar Triton Five's external dimensions. KEF Reference 3 Meta has external dimensions of 1207 x 323 x 467 mm ( 47.5 x 12.7 x 18.4 in.) whereas GoldenEar Triton Five has external dimensions of 1131.0 x 281.0 x 421.0mm ( 44-1/2 x 11-1/16 x 16-9/16inch) .

KEF Reference 3 Meta is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 42mm wider, 76mm taller and 46mm deeper than GoldenEar Triton Five.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the KEF Reference 3 Meta is approximately 1508.4cm2 / 233.8inch2 and base area of the GoldenEar Triton Five is approximately 1183.0cm2 / 183.4inch2. The Reference 3 Meta requires 28% more surface area than the Triton Five which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The KEF Reference 3 Meta weighs 51.30kg / 112.9lbs and the GoldenEar Triton Five weighs 18.18kg / 40lbs. This makes the Reference 3 Meta 182% heavier than the Triton Five.

Here is a comparison of how Reference 3 Meta and Triton Five's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
KEF Reference 3 Meta
GoldenEar Triton Five
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of GoldenEar Triton Five?

Here are the items that come with the Triton Five:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • 4 Rubber feet (pre-installed)
  • 4 Spikes
  • 4 Locking nuts
  • Owners Manual

  • Reasons to choose KEF Reference 3 Meta over GoldenEar Triton Five
    Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
    Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 6 inches Larger woofer
    Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections

    Reasons to choose GoldenEar Triton Five over KEF Reference 3 Meta

    Max Input Power 400 watts vs 300 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
    Sensitivity 90 dB vs 86 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
    Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
    Low Frequency Response 26 Hz vs 43 Hz Generates deeper bass
    Passive Radiator four 8-inch infrasonic planar sub-bass vs None Increases the bass performance
    Height 1131mm vs 1207mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 1183cm2 vs 1508cm2 Takes less floor space
    Price per pair* 2398USD vs 15000USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    KEF Reference 3 Meta vs GoldenEar Triton Five Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General KEF Reference 3 Meta GoldenEar Triton Five
    Brand KEF GoldenEar
    Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
    Power Range 50-300 watts 15-400 watts
    Sensitivity 86 dB 90 dB
    Impedance 4 ohms 8 ohms
    Impedance 3.2 ohms n/a
    Frequency Response 43-35k Hz 26-35k Hz
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 2 2
    Woofer Size 6.5" 6"
    Woofer Composition aluminium cone Polypropylene
    Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
    Tweeter Size 1" -
    Tweeter Type aluminium dome with MAT Folded Ribbon
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver 5" No
    Crossover Frequency 450Hz and 2100Hz n/a
    Firing Direction rear rear
    Physical Specs
    Height 1207.0mm (47.5") 1131.0mm (44.5")
    Width 323.0mm (12.7") 281.0mm (11.1")
    Depth 467.0mm (18.4") 421.0mm (16.6")
    Weight 51.30kg (112.9lbs) 18.18kg (40lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Passive Radiator
    Finish n/a MDF/Lacquer
    Available Colors High-Gloss White/Blue, High-Gloss White/Champagne, High-Gloss Black/Grey, High-Gloss Black/Copper, Satin Walnut/Silver Gloss Black
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Biamp Inputs Yes No
    Other
    Parts Warranty 5 years 5 Years
    Labor Warranty 5 years 5 Years

    Most Popular Speakers
    Klipsch Reference R-51M
    Klipsch R-51M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
    B&W 606 S2
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    KEF Q150
    KEF Q150
    2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
    Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
    Klipsch RP-500M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606
    B&W 606
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction