SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND

Focal Vestia Center vs Polk R400 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Focal Vestia Center

Passive Center Channel | 58-30k Hz

Focal Vestia Center
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Polk R400

Passive Center Channel | 48-39K Hz

Polk Audio Reserve R400
CHECK PRICE
Focal Vestia Center Focal Vestia Center
See at AMAZON
Polk R400 Polk R400
See at AMAZON
Focal Vestia Center
See at AMAZON
Polk R400
See at AMAZON
Focal Vestia Center vs Polk R400 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Vestia Center and R400, two Passive Center Channel speakers from Focal and Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Focal Vestia Center and Polk R400 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Focal Vestia Center Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • 1" inverted dome Tweeter
  • 2 x 6.5" Slatefiber Woofer
  • 58-30k Hz Frequency Response
  • 91.5 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:40-200watts
  • Weight:10.00kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 216.0" x 21-1/8" x 10-1/4"( 216.0 x 537.0 x 261.0mm )

Polk R400 Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • 1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator Tweeter
  • 2 x 6.5" Polypropylene Turbine Cone Woofer
  • 48-39K Hz Frequency Response
  • 89 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:20-200watts
  • Weight:14.91kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 199.0" x 24-5/16" x 14-5/8"( 199.0 x 618.0 x 372.0mm )

What size room are the Focal Vestia Center and Polk R400 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Focal Vestia Center Polk R400
Near-field Poor Poor
Small Room Poor Average
Mid-size Room Good Good
Large Room Good Average
Very Large Room Average Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the Focal Vestia Center and Polk R400 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both Vestia Center and R400 are 2-way speakers.

Driver Focal Vestia Center Polk R400
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 2 x 6.5-inch 2 x 6.5-inch

Vestia Center features a 1" Al/Mg inverted dome Tweeter and 2 x 6.5" Slatefiber Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2700Hz. On the other hand, the R400 features a 1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator Tweeter and 2 x 6.5" Polypropylene Turbine Cone Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2500Hz.

Frequency Response

Vestia Center has a frequency range of 58-30k Hz whereas R400 has a frequency range of 48-39K Hz. With a minimum frequency of 48Hz, the R400 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Vestia Center's min frequency of 58Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Center Channel class in our database.

Low Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

Vestia Center
R400
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

Focal Vestia Center
Polk R400
Min
Average
Max

None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Vestia Center and R400 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. Vestia Center sensitivity is rated at 91.5 dB and the R400's is at 89 dB. This 3 dB difference makes the Focal Vestia Center a more sensitive speaker compared to Polk R400, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Center Channel Speakers

Vestia Center
R400
Min
Average
Max

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.

Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both Vestia Center and R400 have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.

If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.

Polk R400  Port
Polk R400 dual Port

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Focal Vestia Center's and Polk R400's external dimensions. Focal Vestia Center has external dimensions of 216.0 x 537.0 x 261.0mm ( 8-1/2-inch x 21-1/8-inch x 10-1/4-inch) whereas Polk R400 has external dimensions of 199.0 x 618.0 x 372.0mm ( 7-13/16 x 24-5/16 x 14-5/8inch) .

Focal Vestia Center is 81mm narrower and 111mm less deeper than Polk R400 but it is also 17mm taller.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Focal Vestia Center is approximately 1401.6cm2 / 217.2inch2 and base area of the Polk R400 is approximately 2299.0cm2 / 356.3inch2. The Vestia Center requires 39% less surface area than the R400 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Focal Vestia Center weighs 10.00kg / 22lbs and the Polk R400 weighs 14.91kg / 32.8lbs. This makes the R400 49% heavier than the Vestia Center.

Here is a comparison of how Vestia Center and R400's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Center Channel class.

Weight
All Center Channel Speakers
Focal Vestia Center
Polk R400
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Polk R400?

Here are the items that come with the R400:
  • Center-channel loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Owners Manual
  • Online Registration

  • Reasons to choose Focal Vestia Center over Polk Audio Reserve R400
    Sensitivity 92 dB vs 89 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
    Base Surface Area 1401cm2 vs 2299cm2 Takes less floor space

    Reasons to choose Polk Audio Reserve R400 over Focal Vestia Center

    Minimum Impedance 4.1 ohms vs 3.6 ohms Very low impedance levels puts more pressure on amplifier
    Low Frequency Response 48 Hz vs 58 Hz Generates deeper bass
    High Frequency Response 39k Hz vs 30k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Height 199mm vs 216mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Price per pair* 649USD vs 699USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    Focal Vestia Center vs Polk R400 Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General Focal Vestia Center Polk Audio Reserve R400
    Brand Focal Polk Audio
    Speaker Type Center channel speaker Center channel speaker
    Power Range 40-200 watts 20-200 watts
    Sensitivity 91.5 dB 89 dB
    Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
    Impedance 3.6 ohms 4.1 ohms
    Frequency Response 58-30k Hz 48-39K Hz
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 2 2
    Woofer Size 6.5" 6.5"
    Woofer Composition Slatefiber Polypropylene Turbine Cone
    Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
    Tweeter Size 1" 1"
    Tweeter Type inverted dome Pinnacle Ring Radiator
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No N/A"
    Crossover Frequency 2700Hz 2500Hz
    Firing Direction rear rear
    Physical Specs
    Height 216.0mm (8.5") 199.0mm (7.8")
    Width 537.0mm (21.1") 618.0mm (24.3")
    Depth 261.0mm (10.3") 372.0mm (14.6")
    Weight 10.00kg (22lbs) 14.91kg (32.8lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
    Finish MDF n/a
    Available Colors Black High Gloss, Dark Wood, Light Wood Black, Walnut
    Grille Yes Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Biamp Inputs No No
    Other
    Parts Warranty 5 Years
    Labor Warranty 5 Years

    Most Popular Speakers
    Klipsch Reference R-51M
    Klipsch R-51M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
    B&W 606 S2
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    KEF Q150
    KEF Q150
    2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
    Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
    Klipsch RP-500M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606
    B&W 606
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction