SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Dynaudio Focus 50 vs B&W 702 S3

Dynaudio Focus 50 vs B&W 702 S3 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Dynaudio Focus 50

Powered Floor-standing | 22-22k Hz

Dynaudio Focus 50
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
B&W 702 S3

Passive Floor-standing | 46-28k Hz

Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3
Check price atAmazon›
Dynaudio Focus 50 Dynaudio Focus 50
Check price atAmazon›
B&W 702 S3 B&W 702 S3
Check price atAmazon›
Dynaudio Focus 50
See at AMAZON
B&W 702 S3
See at AMAZON

Dynaudio Focus 50 vs B&W 702 S3 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Focus 50 and 702 S3, two Floor-standing speakers from Dynaudio and Bowers Wilkins. The main difference between these two speakers is that the Dynaudio Focus 50 is a Powered speaker which means that it has a built-in amplifier inside the speaker body so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp whereas the B&W 702 S3 is a Passive speaker so has to be matched with an amplifier to get any sound from it.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Dynaudio Focus 50 and B&W 702 S3 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsDynaudio Focus 50B&W 702 S3
BrandDynaudio
Denmark · founded 1977
Bowers Wilkins
United Kingdom · founded 1966
Design3-way3-way
Built-in amplifier670-watt RMS (1000-watt peak)—
Tweeter1.1" Soft-Dome1"
Midrange6"6"
Woofer2 x 7" MSP3 x 6.5" Aerofoil
Frequency response22-22k Hz46-28k Hz
Sensitivity—90 dB
Impedance—8 ohms
Power range—30-300 watts
Max depth / sample rate24-bit / 192 kHz—
BluetoothBuilt-in 4.2—
App controlYes—
Weight33.50kg / 73.7lbs33.46kg / 73.6lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)44-7/8" x 8-1/2" x 12"
1140.0 x 215.0 x 305.0mm
44.8" x 7.6" x 15.4"
1138.0 x 192.0 x 391.0mm

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both Focus 50 and 702 S3 are 3-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1.1 inchMidrange - 6 inchWoofer - 7 inchWoofer - 7 inch
Dynaudio Focus 50
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
B&W 702 S3

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Dynaudio Focus 50 B&W 702 S3
Driver Setup 3-way 3-way
Tweeter 1.1-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 6-inch 1 x 6-inch
Woofer 2 x 7-inch 3 x 6.5-inch

Focus 50 features a 1.1" Cerotar Soft-Dome Tweeter, a 6" Midrange and 2 x 7" MSP Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 220 Hz - 2400 Hz. On the other hand, the 702 S3 features a 1" Tweeter, a 6" Midrange and 3 x 6.5" Aerofoil Woofer.

Frequency Response

Focus 50 has a frequency range of 22-22k Hz whereas 702 S3 has a frequency range of 46-28k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 22Hz, the Focus 50 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the 702 S3's min frequency of 46Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Focus 50
702 S3
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Dynaudio Focus 50's and B&W 702 S3's external dimensions. Dynaudio Focus 50 has external dimensions of 1140.0 x 215.0 x 305.0mm (44-7/8-inch x 8-1/2-inch x 12-inch) whereas B&W 702 S3 has external dimensions of 1138.0 x 192.0 x 391.0mm (44.8-inch x 7.6-inch x 15.4-inch).

B&W 702 S3 is 23mm narrower and 2mm shorter than Dynaudio Focus 50 but it is also 86mm deeper.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Dynaudio Focus 50 is approximately 655.8cm2 / 101.6inch2 and base area of the B&W 702 S3 is approximately 750.7cm2 / 116.4inch2. The Focus 50 requires 13% less surface area than the 702 S3 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

What's in the Box of B&W 702 S3?

Here are the items that come with the 702 S3:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Plinth (base)
  • 2 Jumper-straps (pre-installed)
  • Two-piece foam port plug
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • 4 Spike feet
  • 4 Lock-nuts
  • 4 Screws
  • 4 Washers
  • 4 Lock washers
  • Hex-key
  • Manual
  • Bowers & Wilkins brochure
  • Warranty Information


Reasons to choose Dynaudio Focus 50 over Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3

Speaker Type Powered vs Passive Built-in amplifier
Woofer Size 7 inches vs 6.5 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 22 Hz vs 46 Hz Generates deeper bass
Base Surface Area 655cm2 vs 750cm2 Takes less floor space
Ethernet Connection Yes vs No High quality streaming over Ethernet
RCA Connection Yes vs No Connection via RCA input

Reasons to choose Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3 over Dynaudio Focus 50

Number of Woofers 3 vs 2 More woofers
High Frequency Response 28k Hz vs 22k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 1138mm vs 1140mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Price per pair* 6998USD vs 11000USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Dynaudio Focus 50 vs B&W 702 S3 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Dynaudio Focus 50 Bowers & Wilkins 702 S3
Brand Dynaudio Bowers Wilkins
Speaker Type Powered Stereo Speakers Floor-standing speaker
Sensitivity n/a 90 dB
Impedance n/a 8 ohms
Impedance n/a 3.1 ohms
Frequency Response 22-22k Hz 46-28k Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) 670-watt RMS n/a
Watts Peak (Max) 1000-watt RMS n/a
Max Bit Depth 24-bit n/a
Max Sample Rate 192 kHz n/a
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 3
Woofer Size 7" 6.5"
Woofer Composition MSP Aerofoil
Woofer Surround Material n/a Rubber
Tweeter Size 1.1" 1"
Tweeter Type Soft-Dome n/a
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 6" 6"
Crossover Frequency 220 Hz - 2400 Hz n/a
Firing Direction n/a rear
Physical Specs
Height 1140.0mm (44.9") 1138.0mm (44.8")
Width 215.0mm (8.5") 192.0mm (7.6")
Depth 305.0mm (12") 391.0mm (15.4")
Weight 33.50kg (73.7lbs) 33.46kg (73.6lbs)
Enclosure Acoustic Suspension Bass Reflex
Finish n/a MDF/Lacquer
Available Colors Black High Gloss, White High Gloss, Blonde Wood, Walnut Wood Gloss Black,Satin White,Mocha,Rosenut
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs n/a Yes
Aux Inputs 2x RCA n/a
USB Port Service only n/a
Phone Input No n/a
Subwoofer Output mono-RCA n/a
Digital Input 1x Toslink, 1x RCA n/a
HDMI Input No n/a
Headphone Jack No n/a
Ethernet Port Yes n/a
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years

Verdict

Different kinds of product: one is active with its amplifier built in, the other passive and needs one. Judge them on how you want to own the system, not just the specs.

AreaBetterWhy
BassADynaudio Focus 50 digs deeper - 22Hz against 46Hz.
What you buydependsDynaudio Focus 50 is a complete system - just add a source. B&W 702 S3 also needs an amplifier: more money and another box, but you choose it.
ConnectionsdependsDynaudio Focus 50 has Bluetooth, Wi-Fi and streaming built in. With B&W 702 S3 that all comes from the amplifier you pair it with.
Upgrade pathdependsB&W 702 S3 can be re-amped later and outlive several amplifiers; Dynaudio Focus 50 ages as one unit.
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
CabinetdependsSealed vs Ported. Sealed is tighter and happier near a wall; ported digs lower but wants space behind it.
ExpandabilitydependsDynaudio Focus 50: a sub output; B&W 702 S3: bi-amping. B&W 702 S3 sits in a wider range (8 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceBB&W 702 S3 is cheaper - $6,998 against $11,000, about 36% less. Speakers only - an amplifier narrows that gap.

A Dynaudio Focus 50  B B&W 702 S3
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Dynaudio Focus 50 suits you if you want one box, ready to play, with nothing else to buy. B&W 702 S3 suits you if you already have an amplifier, want to choose the electronics, or expect to upgrade in stages. Neither is the better speaker in the abstract. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 46Hz anyway, which makes the cheaper B&W 702 S3 much easier to justify. Think about the whole system, not just the speakers: the roughly $4,002 saved by taking the cheaper pair would buy a subwoofer or a better amplifier, and either usually does more for the sound than the difference between these two.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction