SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive In-wall Speakers
  3. Definitive UIW RSS II vs Polk Audio 265-LS

Definitive UIW RSS II vs Polk Audio 265-LS Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Definitive UIW RSS II

Passive In-wall | 26-30kHz

Definitive Technology UIW RSS II
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Polk Audio 265-LS

Passive In-wall | 28-33kHz

Polk Audio 265-LS
Check price atAmazon›
Definitive UIW RSS II Definitive UIW RSS I...
Check price atAmazon›
Polk Audio 265-LS Polk Audio 265-LS
Check price atAmazon›
Definitive UIW RSS I...
See at AMAZON
Polk Audio 265-LS
See at AMAZON

Definitive UIW RSS II vs Polk Audio 265-LS Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing UIW RSS II and 265-LS, two Passive In-wall speakers from Definitive Technology and Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Definitive UIW RSS II and Polk Audio 265-LS first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsDefinitive UIW RSS IIPolk Audio 265-LS
BrandDefinitive Technology
United States · founded 1990
Polk Audio
United States · founded 1972
Design2-way3-way
Tweeter1" Hard-Dome1" Ring Radiator
Midrange—6.5"
Woofer2 x 4.5" Polypropylene6.5" Aerated polypropylene
Frequency response26-30kHz28-33kHz
Sensitivity90 dB91 dB
Impedance8 ohms8 ohms
Power range10-250 watts10-200 watts
Weight5.67kg / 12.5lbs4.09kg / 9lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)11.6250" x 9.8750" x 3.8750"
296.0 x 251.0 x 99.0mm
19.1875" x 7.2500" x 3-3/4"
488.0 x 185.0 x 95.3mm

What size room are the Definitive UIW RSS II and Polk Audio 265-LS speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Definitive UIW RSS II Polk Audio 265-LS
Near-field Poor Poor
Small Room Poor Average
Mid-size Room Good Good
Large Room Good Average
Very Large Room Average Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that UIW RSS II is a 2-way design whereas the 265-LS is a 3-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 4.5 inchWoofer - 4.5 inch
Definitive UIW RSS II
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Polk Audio 265-LS

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Definitive UIW RSS II Polk Audio 265-LS
Driver Setup 2-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - 1 x 6.5-inch
Woofer 2 x 4.5-inch 1 x 6.5-inch

UIW RSS II features a 1" Hard-Dome Tweeter and 2 x 4.5" Polypropylene Woofer. On the other hand, the 265-LS features a 1" Ring Radiator Tweeter, a 6.5" Midrange and 1 x 6.5" Aerated polypropylene Woofer.

Frequency Response

UIW RSS II has a frequency range of 26-30kHz whereas 265-LS has a frequency range of 28-33kHz. With a minimum frequency of 26Hz, the UIW RSS II can go slightly deeper then the 265-LS's min frequency of 28Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the In-wall class in our database.

Low Frequency

In-wall Speakers

UIW RSS II
265-LS
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

UIW RSS II and 265-LS have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. UIW RSS II sensitivity is rated at 90 dB and the 265-LS's is at 91 dB. This 1 dB difference makes the Polk Audio 265-LS a more sensitive speaker compared to Definitive UIW RSS II, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

In-wall Speakers

UIW RSS II
265-LS
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

UIW RSS II can handle a max power of 250 watts RMS, whereas 265-LS has a max power handling value of 200 watts RMS, 50 watts less than the UIW RSS II.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Definitive UIW RSS II
 
Polk Audio 265-LS
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

UIW RSS II features Spring post type posts and 265-LS has a Spring post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Definitive UIW RSS II's and Polk Audio 265-LS's external dimensions. Definitive UIW RSS II has external dimensions of 296.0 x 251.0 x 99.0mm (11.6250-inch x 9.8750-inch x 3.8750-inch) whereas Polk Audio 265-LS has external dimensions of 488.0 x 185.0 x 95.3mm (19.1875-inch x 7.2500-inch x 0.0000-inch).

Polk Audio 265-LS is 66mm narrower and 3.7mm less deeper than Definitive UIW RSS II but it is also 192mm taller.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Definitive UIW RSS II weighs 5.67kg / 12.5lbs and the Polk Audio 265-LS weighs 4.09kg / 9lbs. This makes the UIW RSS II 39% heavier than the 265-LS.

Here is a comparison of how UIW RSS II and 265-LS's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive In-wall class.

Weight
All In-wall Speakers
Definitive UIW RSS II
Polk Audio 265-LS
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Definitive UIW RSS II?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of UIW RSS II:
  • In-wall/In-cieling bipolar speaker
  • Grille
  • 7 Foam strips
  • 2 Screws
  • Paint mask
  • Wall template
  • Owners Manual
  • Online Product Registration Card

What's in the Box of Polk Audio 265-LS?

Here are the items that come with the 265-LS:
  • In-wall loudspeaker
  • White metal grille
  • Power Port plug
  • Mounting template
  • Owners Manual


Reasons to choose Definitive Technology UIW RSS II over Polk Audio 265-LS

Max Input Power 250 watts vs 200 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 26 Hz vs 28 Hz Generates deeper bass
Passive Radiator 2 x 4.5-inch vs None Increases the bass performance
Height 296mm vs 488mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces

Reasons to choose Polk Audio 265-LS over Definitive Technology UIW RSS II

Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Sensitivity 91 dB vs 90 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 4.5 inches Larger woofer
High Frequency Response 33k Hz vs 30k Hz Generates higher frequency
Base Surface Area 176cm2 vs 248cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 758USD vs 1398USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Definitive UIW RSS II vs Polk Audio 265-LS Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Definitive Technology UIW RSS II Polk Audio 265-LS
Brand Definitive Technology Polk Audio
Speaker Type Passive In-wall Speaker Passive In-wall Speaker
Power Range 10-250 watts 10-200 watts
Sensitivity 90 dB 91 dB
Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
Frequency Response 26-30kHz 28-33kHz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 1
Woofer Size 4.5" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Polypropylene Aerated polypropylene
Woofer Surround Material Buty Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Hard-Dome Ring Radiator
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No 6.5"
Physical Specs
Height 296.0mm (11.7") 488.0mm (19.2")
Width 251.0mm (9.9") 185.0mm (7.3")
Depth 99.0mm (3.9") 95.3mm (3.8")
Weight 5.67kg (12.5lbs) 4.09kg (9lbs)
Enclosure In-wall In-wall
Moisture Resistancy Yes No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years Lifetime
Labor Warranty 5 Years Lifetime

Verdict

These sit in different price classes - Definitive UIW RSS II costs roughly 1.8x what Polk Audio 265-LS does. Expect it to lead on paper; the question is whether the gap is audible enough in your room to be worth it.

AreaBetterWhy
Bassevenly matchedMuch the same reach (26Hz vs 28Hz).
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (90dB vs 91dB) - both want much the same power.
HeadroomADefinitive UIW RSS II takes more power (250W vs 200W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
PriceBPolk Audio 265-LS is cheaper - $758 against $1,398, about 46% less; arguably a different class.

A Definitive UIW RSS II  B Polk Audio 265-LS
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

Definitive UIW RSS II is ahead, but only on 1 of the measured areas, and it costs about 84% more. That is a lot of money for a narrow margin on paper - Polk Audio 265-LS looks like the sensible buy unless something else about the Definitive UIW RSS II appeals to you. Match it to your room: we rate Definitive UIW RSS II the better fit for a large room and a very large room, and Polk Audio 265-LS for a small room. Think about the whole system, not just the speakers: the roughly $640 saved by taking the cheaper pair would buy a subwoofer or a better amplifier, and either usually does more for the sound than the difference between these two.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction