SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND
Wharfedale SW-15 vs SVS SB-2000 Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Wharfedale SW-15

Powered Subwoofer | 30-120 Hz

Wharfedale SW-15
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
SVS SB-2000

Powered Subwoofer | 19-220 Hz

SVS SB-2000
CHECK PRICE
Wharfedale SW-15 Wharfedale SW-15
See at AMAZON
SVS SB-2000 SVS SB-2000
See at AMAZON
Wharfedale SW-15
See at AMAZON
SVS SB-2000
See at AMAZON
Wharfedale SW-15 vs SVS SB-2000 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing SW-15 and SB-2000, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Wharfedale and SVS. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Wharfedale SW-15 and SVS SB-2000 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Wharfedale SW-15 Key Specs

  • 15" Paper Woofer
  • 30-120 Hz Frequency Response
  • 400 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:31.57kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 570.0" x 19-3/8" x 24-3/16"( 570.0 x 493.0 x 615.0mm )

SVS SB-2000 Key Specs

  • 12" Aluminum Woofer
  • 19-220 Hz Frequency Response
  • 500 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:15.82kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 372.0" x 14-1/4" x 18-13/16"( 372.0 x 362.0 x 478.0mm )

In the following sections, we will get into details in order to better understand how the Wharfedale SW-15 and SVS SB-2000 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these subwoofers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Both Wharfedale SW-15and SVS SB-2000 have a single woofer setup however the Wharfedale SW-15's woofer is 15-inch whereas the SVS SB-2000 features a 12-inch woofer.

Frequency Response

SW-15 has a frequency range of 30-120 Hz whereas SB-2000 has a frequency range of 19-220 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 19Hz, the SB-2000 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the SW-15's min frequency of 30Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Wharfedale SW-15
SVS SB-2000
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Wharfedale SW-15
SVS SB-2000
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The Wharfedale SW-15 has a Bass Reflex type cabinet. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs. On the other hand the SVS SB-2000 have Acoustic Suspension type enclosure. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs.

New

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Wharfedale SW-15's and SVS SB-2000's external dimensions. Wharfedale SW-15 has external dimensions of 570.0 x 493.0 x 615.0mm ( 22-7/16inch x 19-3/8inch x 24-3/16inch ) whereas SVS SB-2000 has external dimensions of 372.0 x 362.0 x 478.0mm ( 14-5/8 x 14-1/4 x 18-13/16inch) .

Wharfedale SW-15 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 131mm wider, 198mm taller and 137mm deeper than SVS SB-2000.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Wharfedale SW-15 and SVS SB-2000 in scale.

Wharfedale SW-15 vs SVS SB-2000 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Wharfedale SW-15 and SVS SB-2000 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Wharfedale SW-15 is approximately 3032.0cm2 / 470.0inch2 and base area of the SVS SB-2000 is approximately 1730.4cm2 / 268.2inch2. The SW-15 requires 75% more surface area than the SB-2000 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Wharfedale SW-15 weighs 31.57kg / 69.5lbs and the SVS SB-2000 weighs 15.82kg / 34.8lbs. This makes the SW-15 100% heavier than the SB-2000.

Here is a comparison of how SW-15 and SB-2000's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Wharfedale SW-15
SVS SB-2000
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Wharfedale SW-15?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of SW-15:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • Grille
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • User-feets Manual
  • What's in the Box of SVS SB-2000?

    Here are the items that come with the SB-2000:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • Grille
  • 8-feet AC power cord
  • Owners Manual
  • Quick Start Guide

  • Reasons to choose Wharfedale SW-15 over SVS SB-2000
    Woofer Size 15 inches vs 12 inches Larger woofer
    Reasons to choose SVS SB-2000 over Wharfedale SW-15
    Low Frequency Response 19 Hz vs 30 Hz Generates deeper bass
    High Frequency Response 220k Hz vs 120k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Height 372mm vs 570mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 1730cm2 vs 3032cm2 Takes less floor space
    Price per pair* 600USD vs 1199USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    Wharfedale SW-15 vs SVS SB-2000 Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General Wharfedale SW-15 SVS SB-2000
    Brand Wharfedale SVS
    Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
    Max Amplifier Output 400 watts 500 watts
    Frequency Response 30-120 Hz 19-220 Hz
    Amplifier
    Watts RMS (Continuous) 400-watt RMS 500-watt RMS
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 1 1
    Woofer Size 15" 12"
    Woofer Composition Paper Aluminum
    Tweeter Size - -
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No No
    Crossover Frequency n/a 50-160 Hz and 80 Hz
    Firing Direction front front
    Physical Specs
    Height 570.0mm (22.4") 372.0mm (14.6")
    Width 493.0mm (19.4") 362.0mm (14.3")
    Depth 615.0mm (24.2") 478.0mm (18.8")
    Weight 31.57kg (69.5lbs) 15.82kg (34.8lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Acoustic Suspension
    Grille Yes Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Other
    Parts Warranty 3 Years 5 Years
    Labor Warranty 3 Years 5 Years

    Latest Powered Subwoofers
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    12-inch Woofer | 22-250 Hz | 300 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    10-inch Woofer | 28-250 Hz | 200 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    8-inch Woofer | 32-180 Hz | 100 watts
    JBL Stage 220P
    JBL Stage 220P
    12-inch Woofer | 29-150 Hz | 250 watts
    JBL Stage 200P
    JBL Stage 200P
    10-inch Woofer | 32-150 Hz | 150 watts
    KEF KC92
    KEF KC92
    9-inch Woofer | 11-200 Hz | 1000 watts
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    15-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    12-inch Woofer | 22-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    10-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    8-inch Woofer | 34-140 Hz | 300 watts

    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction