SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND
Klipsch Reference R-121SW vs MartinLogan Dynamo 400 Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Klipsch R-121SW

Powered Subwoofer | 28-120 Hz

Klipsch Reference R-121SW
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
MartinLogan 400

Powered Subwoofer | 30-200 Hz

MartinLogan Dynamo 400
CHECK PRICE
Klipsch R-121SW Klipsch R-121SW
See at AMAZON
MartinLogan 400 MartinLogan 400
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-121SW
See at AMAZON
MartinLogan 400
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-121SW vs MartinLogan 400 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing R-121SW and Dynamo 400, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Klipsch and MartinLogan. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch R-121SW and MartinLogan 400 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Klipsch R-121SW Key Specs

  • 12" Spun-Copper TCP Woofer
  • 28-120 Hz Frequency Response
  • 200 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:16.00kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 423.0" x 16" x 20-15/16"( 423.0 x 407.0 x 532.0mm )

MartinLogan 400 Key Specs

  • 8" Polypropylene Woofer
  • 30-200 Hz Frequency Response
  • 75 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:12.95kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 385.0" x 13-5/16" x 15-1/4"( 385.0 x 339.0 x 388.0mm )

In the following sections, we will get into details in order to better understand how the Klipsch R-121SW and MartinLogan 400 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these subwoofers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Both Klipsch R-121SWand MartinLogan 400 have a single woofer setup however the Klipsch R-121SW's woofer is 12-inch whereas the MartinLogan 400 features a 8-inch woofer.

Frequency Response

R-121SW has a frequency range of 28-120 Hz whereas Dynamo 400 has a frequency range of 30-200 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 28Hz, the R-121SW can go slightly deeper then the Dynamo 400's min frequency of 30Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Klipsch R-121SW
MartinLogan 400
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Klipsch R-121SW
MartinLogan 400
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The Klipsch R-121SW has a Bass Reflex type cabinet. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs. On the other hand the MartinLogan 400 have Bass reflex type enclosure.

Klipsch R-121SW  Port
Klipsch R-121SW Port

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch R-121SW's and MartinLogan 400's external dimensions. Klipsch R-121SW has external dimensions of 423.0 x 407.0 x 532.0mm ( 16-5/8inch x 16inch x 20-15/16inch ) whereas MartinLogan 400 has external dimensions of 385.0 x 339.0 x 388.0mm ( 15-1/8 x 13-5/16 x 15-1/4inch) .

Klipsch R-121SW is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 68mm wider, 38mm taller and 144mm deeper than MartinLogan 400.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Klipsch R-121SW and MartinLogan 400 in scale.

Klipsch R-121SW vs MartinLogan 400 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Klipsch R-121SW and MartinLogan 400 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Klipsch R-121SW is approximately 2165.2cm2 / 335.6inch2 and base area of the MartinLogan 400 is approximately 1315.3cm2 / 203.9inch2. The R-121SW requires 65% more surface area than the Dynamo 400 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Klipsch R-121SW weighs 16.00kg / 35.2lbs and the MartinLogan 400 weighs 12.95kg / 28.5lbs. This makes the R-121SW 24% heavier than the Dynamo 400.

Here is a comparison of how R-121SW and Dynamo 400's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Klipsch R-121SW
MartinLogan 400
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Klipsch R-121SW?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of R-121SW:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • Grille
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information
  • What's in the Box of MartinLogan 400?

    Here are the items that come with the Dynamo 400:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • User-feets Manual

  • Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference R-121SW over MartinLogan Dynamo 400
    Woofer Size 12 inches vs 8 inches Larger woofer
    Low Frequency Response 28 Hz vs 30 Hz Generates deeper bass
    Reasons to choose MartinLogan Dynamo 400 over Klipsch Reference R-121SW
    High Frequency Response 200k Hz vs 120k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Height 385mm vs 423mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 1315cm2 vs 2165cm2 Takes less floor space
    Price per pair* 500USD vs 599USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    Klipsch R-121SW vs MartinLogan 400 Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General Klipsch Reference R-121SW MartinLogan Dynamo 400
    Brand Klipsch MartinLogan
    Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
    Max Amplifier Output 200 watts 75 watts
    Frequency Response 28-120 Hz 30-200 Hz
    Amplifier
    Watts RMS (Continuous) 200-watt RMS 75-watt RMS
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 1 1
    Woofer Size 12" 8"
    Woofer Composition Spun-Copper TCP Polypropylene
    Tweeter Size - -
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No No
    Firing Direction front bottom
    Physical Specs
    Height 423.0mm (16.7") 385.0mm (15.2")
    Width 407.0mm (16") 339.0mm (13.3")
    Depth 532.0mm (20.9") 388.0mm (15.3")
    Weight 16.00kg (35.2lbs) 12.95kg (28.5lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass reflex
    Available Colors n/a Satin Black
    Grille Yes Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Other
    Parts Warranty 2 Years 3 Yrs w/ Registration
    Labor Warranty 2 Years 3 Yrs w/ Registration

    Latest Powered Subwoofers
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    12-inch Woofer | 22-250 Hz | 300 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    10-inch Woofer | 28-250 Hz | 200 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    8-inch Woofer | 32-180 Hz | 100 watts
    JBL Stage 220P
    JBL Stage 220P
    12-inch Woofer | 29-150 Hz | 250 watts
    JBL Stage 200P
    JBL Stage 200P
    10-inch Woofer | 32-150 Hz | 150 watts
    KEF KC92
    KEF KC92
    9-inch Woofer | 11-200 Hz | 1000 watts
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    15-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    12-inch Woofer | 22-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    10-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    8-inch Woofer | 34-140 Hz | 300 watts

    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction