SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND

Polk XT60 vs Jamo S 809 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Polk XT60

Passive Floor-standing | 38-40k Hz

Polk Audio Monitor XT60
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Jamo S 809

Passive Floor-standing | 37-26k Hz

Jamo Studio S 809
CHECK PRICE
Polk  XT60 Polk XT60
See at AMAZON
Jamo S 809 Jamo S 809
See at AMAZON
Polk XT60
See at AMAZON
Jamo S 809
See at AMAZON
Polk XT60 vs Jamo S 809 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing XT60 and S 809, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from Polk Audio and Jamo.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Polk XT60 and Jamo S 809 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Polk XT60 Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • 1" dome Tweeter
  • 6.5" Bi-laminate paper Woofer
  • 38-40k Hz Frequency Response
  • 86 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:25-200watts
  • Weight:9.09kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 929.0" x 9-1/16" x 9-15/16"( 929.0 x 231.0 x 253.0mm )

Jamo S 809 Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • 1" Tweeter
  • 3 x 5" Aluminized Polyfiber Woofer
  • 37-26k Hz Frequency Response
  • 90 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:120watts
  • Weight:13.60kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 1042.0" x 7.5" x 9.9"( 1042.0 x 191.0 x 252.0mm )

What size room are the Polk XT60 and Jamo S 809 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Polk XT60 Jamo S 809
Near-field Bad Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Good Good
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Poor Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the Polk XT60 and Jamo S 809 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both XT60 and S 809 are 2-way speakers.

Driver Polk XT60 Jamo S 809
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 1 x 6.5-inch 3 x 5-inch

XT60 features a 1" Terylene dome Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" Bi-laminate paper Woofer . On the other hand, the S 809 features a 1" Tweeter and 3 x 5" Aluminized Polyfiber Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2000Hz.

Frequency Response

XT60 has a frequency range of 38-40k Hz whereas S 809 has a frequency range of 37-26k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 37Hz, the S 809 can go slightly deeper then the XT60's min frequency of 38Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

XT60
S 809
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Polk XT60
Jamo S 809
Min
Average
Max

None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

XT60 and S 809 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. XT60 sensitivity is rated at 86 dB and the S 809's is at 90 dB. This 4 dB difference makes the Jamo S 809 a more sensitive speaker compared to Polk XT60, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

XT60
S 809
Min
Average
Max

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.

XT60 can handle a max power of 200 watts RMS from the amp the whereas S 809 has a max power handling value of 120 watts RMS, 80 watts less than the XT60.

Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

XT60 features Post type posts and S 809 has a Post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Jamo S 809Post Terminals
Jamo S 809's Post terminals

Jamo S 809  Port
Jamo S 809 Port

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Polk XT60's and Jamo S 809's external dimensions. Polk XT60 has external dimensions of 929.0 x 231.0 x 253.0mm ( 36-9/16 x 9-1/16 x 9-15/16inch) whereas Jamo S 809 has external dimensions of 1042.0 x 191.0 x 252.0mm ( 41.0 x 7.5 x 9.9inch) .

Jamo S 809 is 40mm narrower and 1mm less deeper than Polk XT60 but it is also 113mm taller.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Polk XT60 and Jamo S 809 in scale.

Polk  XT60 vs Jamo S 809 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Polk XT60 and Jamo S 809 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Polk XT60 is approximately 584.4cm2 / 90.6inch2 and base area of the Jamo S 809 is approximately 481.3cm2 / 74.6inch2. The XT60 requires 21% more surface area than the S 809 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Polk XT60 weighs 9.09kg / 20lbs and the Jamo S 809 weighs 13.60kg / 29.9lbs. This makes the S 809 50% heavier than the XT60.

Here is a comparison of how XT60 and S 809's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
Polk XT60
Jamo S 809
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Polk XT60?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of XT60:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille (attached)
  • Owners Manual
  • Online Product Registration
  • What's in the Box of Jamo S 809?

    Here are the items that come with the S 809:
  • 2 Floorstanding loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles
  • 8 Mounting feet
  • 16 Screws
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information

  • Reasons to choose Polk Audio Monitor XT60 over Jamo Studio S 809
    Max Input Power 200 watts vs 120 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
    Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5 inches Larger woofer
    High Frequency Response 40k Hz vs 26k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Passive Radiator two 6-1/2-inch vs None Increases the bass performance
    Height 929mm vs 1042mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Price per pair* 498USD vs 634USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

    Reasons to choose Jamo Studio S 809 over Polk Audio Monitor XT60

    Sensitivity 90 dB vs 86 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
    Number of Woofers 3 vs 1 More woofers
    Low Frequency Response 37 Hz vs 38 Hz Generates deeper bass
    Base Surface Area 481cm2 vs 584cm2 Takes less floor space
    Polk XT60 vs Jamo S 809 Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General Polk Audio Monitor XT60 Jamo Studio S 809
    Brand Polk Audio Jamo
    Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
    Power Range 25-200 watts 120 watts
    Sensitivity 86 dB 90 dB
    Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
    Frequency Response 38-40k Hz 37-26k Hz
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 1 3
    Woofer Size 6.5" 5"
    Woofer Composition Bi-laminate paper Aluminized Polyfiber
    Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
    Tweeter Size 1" 1"
    Tweeter Type dome n/a
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No No
    Crossover Frequency n/a 2000Hz
    Firing Direction n/a front
    Physical Specs
    Height 929.0mm (36.6") 1042.0mm (41")
    Width 231.0mm (9.1") 191.0mm (7.5")
    Depth 253.0mm (10") 252.0mm (9.9")
    Weight 9.09kg (20lbs) 13.60kg (29.9lbs)
    Enclosure Passive Radiator Bass Reflex
    Finish MDF, Vinyl MDF/Vinyl
    Available Colors Black Walnut
    Grille Yes Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Biamp Inputs No No
    Other
    Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
    Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

    Most Popular Speakers
    Klipsch Reference R-51M
    Klipsch R-51M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
    B&W 606 S2
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    KEF Q150
    KEF Q150
    2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
    Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
    Klipsch RP-500M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606
    B&W 606
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction