SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND
KEF KC62 vs Jamo S 808 SUB Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

KEF KC62

Powered Subwoofer | 11-200 Hz

KEF KC62
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Jamo S 808 SUB

Powered Subwoofer | 39-180 Hz

Jamo S 808 SUB
CHECK PRICE
KEF KC62 KEF KC62
See at AMAZON
Jamo S 808 SUB Jamo S 808 SUB
See at AMAZON
KEF KC62
See at AMAZON
Jamo S 808 SUB
See at AMAZON
KEF KC62 vs Jamo S 808 SUB Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing KC62 and S 808 SUB, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from KEF and Jamo. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF KC62 and Jamo S 808 SUB first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

KEF KC62 Key Specs

  • 2 x 6.5" Woofer
  • 11-200 Hz Frequency Response
  • 1000 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:14.05kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 245.0" x 10-1/8" x 11-1/16"( 245.0 x 258.0 x 281.0mm )

Jamo S 808 SUB Key Specs

  • 8" Polyfiber Woofer
  • 39-180 Hz Frequency Response
  • 50 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:8.64kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 459.0" x 7" x 14"( 459.0 x 178.0 x 356.0mm )

In the following sections, we will get into details in order to better understand how the KEF KC62 and Jamo S 808 SUB compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these subwoofers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.KEF KC62 and Jamo S 808 SUB have a totally different setup: the KEF KC62 features 2 x 6.5-inch drivers whereas the S 808 SUB features 1 x 8-inch drivers.

Frequency Response

KC62 has a frequency range of 11-200 Hz whereas S 808 SUB has a frequency range of 39-180 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 11Hz, the KC62 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the S 808 SUB's min frequency of 39Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

KEF KC62
Jamo S 808 SUB
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

KEF KC62
Jamo S 808 SUB
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

The KEF KC62 has a Acoustic Suspension type cabinet. Acoustic Suspension aka Sealed type subwoofers have enclosures that are sealed hence no ports or holes exists on the cabinet. Sealed designs helps to provide more accurate and tight bass responses compared to ported designs. On the other hand the Jamo S 808 SUB have Bass Reflex type enclosure. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs.

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare KEF KC62's and Jamo S 808 SUB's external dimensions. KEF KC62 has external dimensions of 245.0 x 258.0 x 281.0mm ( 9-5/8inch x 10-1/8inch x 11-1/16inch ) whereas Jamo S 808 SUB has external dimensions of 459.0 x 178.0 x 356.0mm ( 18-1/16 x 7 x 14inch) .

KEF KC62 is 214mm shorter and 75mm less deeper than Jamo S 808 SUB but it is also 80mm wider.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of KEF KC62 and Jamo S 808 SUB in scale.

KEF KC62 vs Jamo S 808 SUB Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of KEF KC62 and Jamo S 808 SUB Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the KEF KC62 is approximately 725.0cm2 / 112.4inch2 and base area of the Jamo S 808 SUB is approximately 633.7cm2 / 98.2inch2. The KC62 requires 14% more surface area than the S 808 SUB which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The KEF KC62 weighs 14.05kg / 30.9lbs and the Jamo S 808 SUB weighs 8.64kg / 19lbs. This makes the KC62 63% heavier than the S 808 SUB.

Here is a comparison of how KC62 and S 808 SUB's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
KEF KC62
Jamo S 808 SUB
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of KEF KC62?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of KC62:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • 6.5-feet AC power cord
  • Speaker-level input block
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Information
  • Warranty Information
  • What's in the Box of Jamo S 808 SUB?

    Here are the items that come with the S 808 SUB:
  • Powered subwoofer
  • Grille
  • 5-feet AC power cord
  • 6.5-feet Mono-RCA cable
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information

  • Reasons to choose KEF KC62 over Jamo S 808 SUB
    Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
    Low Frequency Response 11 Hz vs 39 Hz Generates deeper bass
    High Frequency Response 200k Hz vs 180k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Height 245mm vs 459mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Wireless Operation Optional vs No Connect your subwoofer to your system wireless
    Reasons to choose Jamo S 808 SUB over KEF KC62
    Woofer Size 8 inches vs 6.5 inches Larger woofer
    Base Surface Area 633cm2 vs 725cm2 Takes less floor space
    Price per pair* 149USD vs 1500USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    KEF KC62 vs Jamo S 808 SUB Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General KEF KC62 Jamo S 808 SUB
    Brand KEF Jamo
    Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
    Max Amplifier Output 1000 watts 50 watts
    Frequency Response 11-200 Hz 39-180 Hz
    Amplifier
    Watts RMS (Continuous) 1000-watt RMS 50-watt RMS
    Watts Peak (Max) n/a 100-watt RMS
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 2 1
    Woofer Size 6.5" 8"
    Woofer Composition Polyfiber
    Tweeter Size - -
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No No
    Firing Direction side Side
    Physical Specs
    Height 245.0mm (9.6") 459.0mm (18.1")
    Width 258.0mm (10.2") 178.0mm (7")
    Depth 281.0mm (11.1") 356.0mm (14")
    Weight 14.05kg (30.9lbs) 8.64kg (19lbs)
    Enclosure Acoustic Suspension Bass Reflex
    Grille n/a Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Other
    Parts Warranty 2 Years 2 Years
    Labor Warranty 2 Years 2 Years

    Latest Powered Subwoofers
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    Polk Signature Elite ES12
    12-inch Woofer | 22-250 Hz | 300 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    Polk Signature Elite ES10
    10-inch Woofer | 28-250 Hz | 200 watts
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    Polk Signature Elite ES8
    8-inch Woofer | 32-180 Hz | 100 watts
    JBL Stage 220P
    JBL Stage 220P
    12-inch Woofer | 29-150 Hz | 250 watts
    JBL Stage 200P
    JBL Stage 200P
    10-inch Woofer | 32-150 Hz | 150 watts
    KEF KC92
    KEF KC92
    9-inch Woofer | 11-200 Hz | 1000 watts
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    KEF Kube 15 MIE
    15-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    KEF Kube 12 MIE
    12-inch Woofer | 22-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    KEF Kube 10 MIE
    10-inch Woofer | 20-140 Hz | 300 watts
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    KEF Kube 8 MIE
    8-inch Woofer | 34-140 Hz | 300 watts

    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction