SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND

KEF Q650c vs Polk R400 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

KEF Q650c

Passive Center Channel | 64-28k Hz

KEF Q650c
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Polk R400

Passive Center Channel | 48-39K Hz

Polk Audio Reserve R400
CHECK PRICE
KEF Q650c KEF Q650c
See at AMAZON
Polk R400 Polk R400
See at AMAZON
KEF Q650c
See at AMAZON
Polk R400
See at AMAZON
KEF Q650c vs Polk R400 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Q650c and R400, two Passive Center Channel speakers from KEF and Polk Audio.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of KEF Q650c and Polk R400 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

KEF Q650c Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • 11th Generation Uni-Q Driver
  • 1" Dome Tweeter
  • 2 x 6.5" aluminum Woofer
  • 64-28k Hz Frequency Response
  • 87 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:15-150watts
  • Weight:13.64kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 212.0" x 24-13/16" x 11-15/16"( 212.0 x 631.0 x 304.0mm )

Polk R400 Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • 1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator Tweeter
  • 2 x 6.5" Polypropylene Turbine Cone Woofer
  • 48-39K Hz Frequency Response
  • 89 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:20-200watts
  • Weight:14.91kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 199.0" x 24-5/16" x 14-5/8"( 199.0 x 618.0 x 372.0mm )

What size room are the KEF Q650c and Polk R400 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* KEF Q650c Polk R400
Near-field Poor Poor
Small Room Average Average
Mid-size Room Good Good
Large Room Average Average
Very Large Room Poor Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the KEF Q650c and Polk R400 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both Q650c and R400 are 2-way speakers.

Driver KEF Q650c Polk R400
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 2 x 6.5-inch 2 x 6.5-inch

Q650c features a 1" vented aluminum Dome Tweeter and 2 x 6.5" aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2500Hz. On the other hand, the R400 features a 1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator Tweeter and 2 x 6.5" Polypropylene Turbine Cone Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2500Hz.

Frequency Response

Q650c has a frequency range of 64-28k Hz whereas R400 has a frequency range of 48-39K Hz. With a minimum frequency of 48Hz, the R400 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Q650c's min frequency of 64Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Center Channel class in our database.

Low Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

Q650c
R400
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

KEF Q650c
Polk R400
Min
Average
Max

None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Q650c and R400 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. Q650c sensitivity is rated at 87 dB and the R400's is at 89 dB. This 2 dB difference makes the Polk R400 a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF Q650c, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Center Channel Speakers

Q650c
R400
Min
Average
Max

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.

Q650c can handle a max power of 200 watts RMS from the amp the whereas Q650c has a max power handling value of 150 watts RMS , 50 watts less than the R400.

Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Q650c features Binding post type posts and R400 has a Binding post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

KEF Q650c Terminals
KEF Q650c's Binding post terminals

Polk R400Binding post Terminals
Polk R400's Binding post terminals

Polk R400  Port
Polk R400 dual Port

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare KEF Q650c's and Polk R400's external dimensions. KEF Q650c has external dimensions of 212.0 x 631.0 x 304.0mm ( 8-5/16 x 24-13/16 x 11-15/16inch) whereas Polk R400 has external dimensions of 199.0 x 618.0 x 372.0mm ( 7-13/16 x 24-5/16 x 14-5/8inch) .

Polk R400 is 13mm narrower and 13mm shorter than KEF Q650c but it is also 68mm deeper.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the KEF Q650c is approximately 1918.2cm2 / 297.3inch2 and base area of the Polk R400 is approximately 2299.0cm2 / 356.3inch2. The Q650c requires 17% less surface area than the R400 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The KEF Q650c weighs 13.64kg / 30lbs and the Polk R400 weighs 14.91kg / 32.8lbs. This makes the R400 9% heavier than the Q650c.

Here is a comparison of how Q650c and R400's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Center Channel class.

Weight
All Center Channel Speakers
KEF Q650c
Polk R400
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of KEF Q650c?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Q650c:
  • Center-channel loudspeaker
  • 4 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • Owners Manual
  • Warranty Information
  • What's in the Box of Polk R400?

    Here are the items that come with the R400:
  • Center-channel loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Owners Manual
  • Online Registration

  • Reasons to choose KEF Q650c over Polk Audio Reserve R400
    Minimum Impedance 4.2 ohms vs 4.1 ohms Very low impedance levels puts more pressure on amplifier
    Passive Radiator one 6.5-inch vs None Increases the bass performance
    Base Surface Area 1918cm2 vs 2299cm2 Takes less floor space

    Reasons to choose Polk Audio Reserve R400 over KEF Q650c

    Max Input Power 200 watts vs 150 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
    Sensitivity 89 dB vs 87 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
    Low Frequency Response 48 Hz vs 64 Hz Generates deeper bass
    High Frequency Response 39k Hz vs 28k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Height 199mm vs 212mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Price per pair* 649USD vs 750USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    KEF Q650c vs Polk R400 Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General KEF Q650c Polk Audio Reserve R400
    Brand KEF Polk Audio
    Speaker Type Center channel speaker Center channel speaker
    Power Range 15-150 watts 20-200 watts
    Sensitivity 87 dB 89 dB
    Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
    Impedance 4.2 ohms 4.1 ohms
    Frequency Response 64-28k Hz 48-39K Hz
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 2 2
    Woofer Size 6.5" 6.5"
    Woofer Composition aluminum Polypropylene Turbine Cone
    Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
    Tweeter Size 1" 1"
    Tweeter Type Dome Pinnacle Ring Radiator
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No N/A"
    Crossover Frequency 2500Hz 2500Hz
    Firing Direction n/a rear
    Physical Specs
    Height 212.0mm (8.3") 199.0mm (7.8")
    Width 631.0mm (24.8") 618.0mm (24.3")
    Depth 304.0mm (12") 372.0mm (14.6")
    Weight 13.64kg (30lbs) 14.91kg (32.8lbs)
    Enclosure Passive Radiator Bass Reflex
    Available Colors Satin White, Satin Black, Walnut Black, Walnut
    Grille optional Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Biamp Inputs n/a No
    Other
    Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
    Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

    Most Popular Speakers
    Klipsch Reference R-51M
    Klipsch R-51M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
    B&W 606 S2
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    KEF Q150
    KEF Q150
    2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
    Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
    Klipsch RP-500M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606
    B&W 606
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction