SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Genelec GoldenEar Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Polk Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus Faber Sony SVS Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers
      By Brand
      Advance Paris Anthem Arcam AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Peachtree Primare PS Audio Rega Roksan Rotel Sonos Sony SVS TEAC Technics WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • AMP MATCHER
  • BLOG
Wilson Audio Subsonic vs Klipsch SPL-120 Comparison
x
Subwoofer to replace
Change

Wilson Audio Subsonic

Powered Subwoofer | 10-150 Hz

Wilson Audio Subsonic
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Klipsch SPL-120

Powered Subwoofer | 24-125 Hz

Klipsch SPL-120
CHECK PRICE
Wilson Audio Subsonic Wilson Audio Subsoni...
See at AMAZON
Klipsch SPL-120 Klipsch SPL-120
See at AMAZON
Wilson Audio Subsoni...
See at AMAZON
Klipsch SPL-120
See at AMAZON
Wilson Audio Subsonic vs Klipsch SPL-120 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Subsonic and SPL-120, two Powered Subwoofer speakers from Wilson Audio and Klipsch. Being Powered subwoofers, they both have built-in amplifiers so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp to power them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Wilson Audio Subsonic and Klipsch SPL-120 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Wilson Audio Subsonic Key Specs

  • 3 x 12" Paper pulp Woofer
  • 10-150 Hz Frequency Response
  • Weight:229.00kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 65-1/16" x 18-1/16" x 27-3/16" ( 1653.0 x 459.0 x 691.0mm )

Klipsch SPL-120 Key Specs

  • 12" Cerametallic Woofer
  • 24-125 Hz Frequency Response
  • 300 watts Max Amplifier Output
  • Weight:20.45kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 17-11/16" x 14-3/4" x 21-1/4" ( 450.0 x 375.0 x 540.0mm )

In the following sections, we will get into details in order to better understand how the Wilson Audio Subsonic and Klipsch SPL-120 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these subwoofers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Drivers

The efficiency of a subwoofer is directly proportional to the total radiating are squared hence the woofer quantity and diameter.Wilson Audio Subsonic and Klipsch SPL-120 have a totally different setup: the Wilson Audio Subsonic features 3 x 12-inch drivers whereas the SPL-120 features 1 x 12-inch drivers.

Frequency Response

Subsonic has a frequency range of 10-150 Hz whereas SPL-120 has a frequency range of 24-125 Hz. With a minimum frequency of 10Hz, the Subsonic can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the SPL-120's min frequency of 24Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Subwoofer class in our database.

Low Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Wilson Audio Subsonic
Klipsch SPL-120
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Subwoofer Speakers

Wilson Audio Subsonic
Klipsch SPL-120
Min
Average
Max

Cabinet Type

Both Wilson Audio Subsonic and Klipsch SPL-120 have Bass Reflex type cabinets. Bass Reflex type subwoofers (aka Ported, Vented or Reflex Port) have enclosures that uses a port, hole or vent cut into the cabinet. Ported designs are generally more efficient than the Sealed designs.

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Wilson Audio Subsonic's and Klipsch SPL-120's external dimensions. Wilson Audio Subsonic has external dimensions of 1653.0 x 459.0 x 691.0mm ( 65-1/16 x 18-1/16 x 27-3/16inch) whereas Klipsch SPL-120 has external dimensions of 450.0 x 375.0 x 540.0mm ( 17-11/16 x 14-3/4 x 21-1/4inch) .

Wilson Audio Subsonic is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 84mm wider, 1203mm taller and 151mm deeper than Klipsch SPL-120.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Wilson Audio Subsonic is approximately 3171.7cm2 / 491.6inch2 and base area of the Klipsch SPL-120 is approximately 2025.0cm2 / 313.9inch2. The Subsonic requires 57% more surface area than the SPL-120 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a subwoofer may become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often to find the optimal positioning, also known as 'Subwoofer Crawling'. The Wilson Audio Subsonic weighs 229.00kg / 503.8lbs and the Klipsch SPL-120 weighs 20.45kg / 45lbs. This makes the Subsonic 1,020% heavier than the SPL-120.

Here is a comparison of how Subsonic and SPL-120's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Powered Subwoofer class.

Weight
All Subwoofer Speakers
Wilson Audio Subsonic
Klipsch SPL-120
Min
Average
Max

Reasons to choose Wilson Audio Subsonic over Klipsch SPL-120
Number of Woofers 3 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 10 Hz vs 24 Hz Generates deeper bass
High Frequency Response 150k Hz vs 125k Hz Generates higher frequency
Reasons to choose Klipsch SPL-120 over Wilson Audio Subsonic
Port Position Front vs Rear Gives more flexibility placing close to walls
Height 450mm vs 1653mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 2025cm2 vs 3171cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 499USD vs 47250USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
Wilson Audio Subsonic vs Klipsch SPL-120 Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Wilson Audio Subsonic Klipsch SPL-120
Brand Wilson Audio Klipsch
Speaker Type Powered Subwoofer Powered Subwoofer
Sensitivity 87 dB n/a
Impedance 4 ohms n/a
Frequency Response 10-150 Hz 24-125 Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) n/a 300-watt RMS
Watts Peak (Max) n/a 600-watt RMS
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 3 1
Woofer Size 12" 12"
Woofer Composition Paper pulp Cerametallic
Tweeter Size - -
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Firing Direction rear front
Physical Specs
Height 1653.0mm (65.1") 450.0mm (17.7")
Width 459.0mm (18.1") 375.0mm (14.8")
Depth 691.0mm (27.2") 540.0mm (21.3")
Weight 229.00kg (503.8lbs) 20.45kg (45lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No n/a
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 2 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 2 Years

Latest Powered Subwoofers
Emotiva Nostala FT12
Emotiva Nostala FT12
12-inch Woofer | 25-150 Hz | 800 watts
Emotiva Airmotiv XS12e
Emotiva Airmotiv XS12e
12-inch Woofer | 28-200 Hz | 300 watts
DALI Sub V-16 F
DALI Sub V-16 F
16-inch Woofer | 19-200 Hz | 1500 watts
DALI Sub P-10 DSS
DALI Sub P-10 DSS
10-inch Woofer | 24-250 Hz | 300 watts
DALI Sub K-14 F
DALI Sub K-14 F
14-inch Woofer | 29-160 Hz | 450 watts
DALI Sub E-9 F
DALI Sub E-9 F
9-inch Woofer | 37-200 Hz | 170 watts
DALI Sub E-12 F
DALI Sub E-12 F
12-inch Woofer | 28-190 Hz | 170 watts
DALI Sub C-8 D
DALI Sub C-8 D
8-inch Woofer | 33-200 Hz | 170 watts
Wilson Audio Subsonic
Wilson Audio Subsonic
12-inch Woofer | 10-150 Hz | watts
Triangle Thetis 340
Triangle Thetis 340
10-inch Woofer | 25-120 Hz | 250 watts

Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction