SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND

Focal Omada No.3 vs Focal Theva No2 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Focal Omada No.3

Passive Floor-standing | 42-30k Hz

Focal Omada No.3
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Focal Theva No2

Passive Floor-standing | 53-28kHz

Focal Theva No2
CHECK PRICE
Focal Omada No.3 Focal Omada No.3
See at AMAZON
Focal Theva No2 Focal Theva No2
See at AMAZON
Focal Omada No.3
See at AMAZON
Focal Theva No2
See at AMAZON
Focal Omada No.3 vs Focal Theva No2 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing Omada No.3 and Theva No2, two Passive Floor-standing speakers by Focal

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Focal Omada No.3 and Focal Theva No2 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Focal Omada No.3 Key Specs

  • 3-way Design
  • 1" Inverted Hard-Dome Tweeter
  • 6.5" Midrange
  • 3 x 6.5" Carbon Fiber + Polymer Woofer
  • 42-30k Hz Frequency Response
  • 91.5 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:40-300watts
  • Weight:26.55kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 1128.0" x 10-1/8" x 13-11/16"( 1128.0 x 258.0 x 348.0mm )

Focal Theva No2 Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • 1" inverted dome Tweeter
  • 6.5" Midrange
  • 2 x 6.5" Slatefiber Woofer
  • 6.5" Midrange
  • 53-28kHz Frequency Response
  • 90 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:40-200watts
  • Weight:16.82kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 931.0" x 7-1/2" x 13-7/8"( 931.0 x 191.0 x 353.0mm )

In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the Focal Omada No.3 and Focal Theva No2 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that Omada No.3 is a 3-way design whereas the Theva No2 is a 2-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Driver Focal Omada No.3 Focal Theva No2
Driver Setup 3-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 6.5-inch 1 x 6.5-inch
Woofer 3 x 6.5-inch 2 x 6.5-inch

Omada No.3 features a 1" Al/Mg Inverted Hard-Dome Tweeter , a 6.5" Midrange and 3 x 6.5" Carbon Fiber + Polymer Woofer . On the other hand, the Theva No2 features a 1" TNF Al/Mg inverted dome Tweeter , a 6.5" Midrange and 2 x 6.5" Slatefiber Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 280 Hz - 2900 Hz.

Frequency Response

Omada No.3 has a frequency range of 42-30k Hz whereas Theva No2 has a frequency range of 53-28kHz. With a minimum frequency of 42Hz, the Omada No.3 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Theva No2's min frequency of 53Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Omada No.3
Theva No2
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Focal Omada No.3
Focal Theva No2
Min
Average
Max

None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

Omada No.3 and Theva No2 have the same Impedance of 8 ohms but where they differ is the sensitivity levels. Omada No.3 sensitivity is rated at 91.5 dB and the Theva No2's is at 90 dB. This 2 dB difference makes the Focal Omada No.3 a more sensitive speaker compared to Focal Theva No2, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

Omada No.3
Theva No2
Min
Average
Max

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.

Omada No.3 can handle a max power of 300 watts RMS from the amp the whereas Theva No2 has a max power handling value of 200 watts RMS, 100 watts less than the Omada No.3.

Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Omada No.3 features Binding post type posts and Theva No2 has a Binding post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Focal Theva No2Binding post Terminals
Focal Theva No2's Binding post terminals

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Omada No.3 has a front firing port whereas Theva No2 has a rear firing ports. Focal Omada No.3's front-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to Focal Theva No2 with its rear-firing port.

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Focal Omada No.3's and Focal Theva No2's external dimensions. Focal Omada No.3 has external dimensions of 1128.0 x 258.0 x 348.0mm ( 44-3/8inch x 10-1/8inch x 13-11/16inch ) whereas Focal Theva No2 has external dimensions of 931.0 x 191.0 x 353.0mm ( 365/8 x 71/2 x 137/8) .

Focal Theva No2 is 67mm narrower and 197mm shorter than Focal Omada No.3 but it is also 5mm deeper.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Focal Omada No.3 is approximately 897.8cm2 / 139.2inch2 and base area of the Focal Theva No2 is approximately 674.2cm2 / 104.5inch2. The Omada No.3 requires 33% more surface area than the Theva No2 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Focal Omada No.3 weighs 26.55kg / 58.4lbs and the Focal Theva No2 weighs 16.82kg / 37lbs. This makes the Omada No.3 58% heavier than the Theva No2.

Here is a comparison of how Omada No.3 and Theva No2's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
Focal Omada No.3
Focal Theva No2
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Focal Omada No.3?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of Omada No.3:
  • 2 Floorstanding loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles
  • 2 Bases
  • 8 Spike feet
  • 8 Nuts
  • 8 Rubber feet
  • 8 Screws
  • Cleaning cloth
  • Hex-key
  • User Manual
  • Focal brochure

  • Reasons to choose Focal Omada No.3 over Focal Theva No2
    Max Input Power 300 watts vs 200 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
    Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
    Sensitivity 92 dB vs 90 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
    Number of Woofers 3 vs 2 More woofers
    Low Frequency Response 42 Hz vs 53 Hz Generates deeper bass
    High Frequency Response 30k Hz vs 28k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Port Position Front vs Rear Gives more flexibility placing close to walls

    Reasons to choose Focal Theva No2 over Focal Omada No.3

    Height 931mm vs 1128mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 674cm2 vs 897cm2 Takes less floor space
    Price per pair* 1798USD vs 2598USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)
    Focal Omada No.3 vs Focal Theva No2 Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General Focal Omada No.3 Focal Theva No2
    Brand Focal Focal
    Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
    Power Range 40-300 watts 40-200 watts
    Sensitivity 91.5 dB 90 dB
    Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
    Impedance n/a 4 ohms
    Frequency Response 42-30k Hz 53-28kHz
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 3 2
    Woofer Size 6.5" 6.5"
    Woofer Composition Carbon Fiber + Polymer Slatefiber
    Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
    Tweeter Size 1" 1"
    Tweeter Type Inverted Hard-Dome inverted dome
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver 6.5" 6.5"
    Crossover Frequency n/a 280 Hz - 2900 Hz
    Firing Direction front rear
    Physical Specs
    Height 1128.0mm (44.4") 931.0mm (36.7")
    Width 258.0mm (10.2") 191.0mm (7.5")
    Depth 348.0mm (13.7") 353.0mm (13.9")
    Weight 26.55kg (58.4lbs) 16.82kg (37lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
    Finish MDF/Lacquer n/a
    Available Colors Black Black High Gloss,Dark Wood,Light Wood
    Grille Yes Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Biamp Inputs No No
    Other
    Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
    Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

    Most Popular Speakers
    Klipsch Reference R-51M
    Klipsch R-51M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
    KEF Q150
    KEF Q150
    2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
    B&W 606 S2
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
    Klipsch RP-500M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale EVO5.1
    Wharfedale EVO5.1
    2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction