SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SOUNDBARS
    • Soundbars
      Soundbars Home All Soundbars (filter + sort) Size Simulator
      By TV Size
      43-50 inch TVs 55 inch TVs 65 inch and larger
      By Feature
      Dolby Atmos height channels Subwoofer included Can add rear speakers Compact (30 in or narrower) Under $500
      By Brand
      Bluesound Bose Denon Devialet Dual Furrion Harman Kardon JBL KEF Klipsch Marshall Polk Audio Samsung Sennheiser Sonos Sony WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Bookshelf Speakers
  3. Q Acoustics 5020 vs Wharfedale Denton 85

Q Acoustics 5020 vs Wharfedale Denton 85 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Q Acoustics 5020

Passive Bookshelf | 53-30k Hz

Q Acoustics 5020
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
Wharfedale Denton 85

Passive Bookshelf | 45-20k Hz

Wharfedale Denton 85
Check price atAmazon›
Q Acoustics 5020 Q Acoustics 5020
Check price atAmazon›
Wharfedale Denton 85 Wharfedale Denton 85
Check price atAmazon›
Q Acoustics 5020
See at AMAZON
Wharfedale Denton 85
See at AMAZON

Q Acoustics 5020 vs Wharfedale Denton 85 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing 5020 and Denton 85, two Passive Bookshelf speakers from Q Acoustics and Wharfedale.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Q Acoustics 5020 and Wharfedale Denton 85 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsQ Acoustics 5020Wharfedale Denton 85
BrandQ Acoustics
United Kingdom · founded 2006
Wharfedale
United Kingdom · founded 1932
Design2-way2-way
Tweeter1" Soft-dome1" Soft-Dome
Woofer5" Continuous Curved Cone6.5" Woven Kevlar
Frequency response53-30k Hz45-20k Hz
Sensitivity87.9 dB88 dB
Impedance6 ohms4 ohms
Power range25-100 watts20-120 watts
Weight7.00kg / 15.4lbs9.00kg / 19.8lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)11-1/4" x 7-1/8" x 11-1/2"
286.0 x 181.0 x 293.0mm
13-7/16" x 9-7/16" x 11-15/16"
342.0 x 240.0 x 304.0mm

What size room are the Q Acoustics 5020 and Wharfedale Denton 85 speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Q Acoustics 5020 Wharfedale Denton 85
Near-field Average Poor
Small Room Good Average
Mid-size Room Average Good
Large Room Poor Average
Very Large Room Bad Poor

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both 5020 and Denton 85 are 2-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5 inch
Q Acoustics 5020
Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
Wharfedale Denton 85

TweeterWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Q Acoustics 5020 Wharfedale Denton 85
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 1 x 5-inch 1 x 6.5-inch

5020 features a 1" Soft-dome Tweeter and 1 x 5" Continuous Curved Cone Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2500 Hz. On the other hand, the Denton 85 features a 1" woven textile Soft-Dome Tweeter and 1 x 6.5" Woven Kevlar Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 3100Hz.

Q Acoustics 5020 driver frequency bandsQ Acoustics 5020Wharfedale Denton 8553-2.5k45-3.1kWoofer2.5k-30k3.1k-20kTweeter20501002005001k2k5k10k20k40kHz, log scale

Frequency Response

5020 has a frequency range of 53-30k Hz whereas Denton 85 has a frequency range of 45-20k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 45Hz, the Denton 85 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the 5020's min frequency of 53Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Bookshelf class in our database.

Low Frequency

Bookshelf Speakers

5020
Denton 85
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

5020 is a 6 ohms speaker compared to the Denton 85 which has a nominal impedance of 4 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the Denton 85 can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. 5020 sensitivity is rated at 87.9 dB and the Denton 85's is rated at 88 dB.

Sensitivity

Bookshelf Speakers

5020
Denton 85
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Denton 85 can handle a max power of 120 watts RMS, whereas 5020 has a max power handling value of 100 watts RMS, 20 watts less than the Denton 85.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Q Acoustics 5020
 
Wharfedale Denton 85
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Denton 85 features Post posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. 5020 has a Binding post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Q Acoustics 5020 Terminals
Q Acoustics 5020's Binding post terminals

Wharfedale Denton 85 Terminals
Wharfedale Denton 85's Post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Cabinet Type and Port Position

Both 5020 and Denton 85 have rear firing ports. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy.

If you are limited in space and can't get the speakers away from the backwall, check our Speakers with Front Firing Ports page.

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Q Acoustics 5020's and Wharfedale Denton 85's external dimensions. Q Acoustics 5020 has external dimensions of 286.0 x 181.0 x 293.0mm (11-1/4nch x 7-1/8inch x 11-1/2inch) whereas Wharfedale Denton 85 has external dimensions of 342.0 x 240.0 x 304.0mm (13-7/16 x 9-7/16 x 11-15/16inch).

Wharfedale Denton 85 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 59mm wider, 56mm taller and 11mm deeper than Q Acoustics 5020.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Q Acoustics 5020 and Wharfedale Denton 85 in scale.

Q Acoustics 5020 vs Wharfedale Denton 85 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Q Acoustics 5020 and Wharfedale Denton 85 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Q Acoustics 5020 is approximately 530.3cm2 / 82.2inch2 and base area of the Wharfedale Denton 85 is approximately 729.6cm2 / 113.1inch2. The 5020 requires 27% less surface area than the Denton 85 which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.

Here is another comparison that shows both speakers on a BDI Octave Media Cabinet, next to a standard size amplifier and turntable in scale:

Q Acoustics 5020 vs Wharfedale Denton 85 Size Comparison on a Media Console
Size Comparison image of Q Acoustics 5020 and Wharfedale Denton 85 on a Media Console
Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Q Acoustics 5020 weighs 7.00kg / 15.4lbs and the Wharfedale Denton 85 weighs 9.00kg / 19.8lbs. This makes the Denton 85 29% heavier than the 5020.

Here is a comparison of how 5020 and Denton 85's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Bookshelf class.

Weight
All Bookshelf Speakers
Q Acoustics 5020
Wharfedale Denton 85
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Q Acoustics 5020?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of 5020:
  • 2x 5020 loudspeaker
  • 1x Owners manual
  • 2x Foam bung

What's in the Box of Wharfedale Denton 85?

Here are the items that come with the Denton 85:
  • 2 Bookshelf loudspeakers
  • 2 Grilles
  • 4 Jumper-bars (pre-installed)
  • 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • Pair of white cloth gloves
  • User Manual


Reasons to choose Q Acoustics 5020 over Wharfedale Denton 85

Nominal Impedance 6 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
High Frequency Response 30k Hz vs 20k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 286mm vs 342mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 530cm2 vs 729cm2 Takes less floor space
Price per pair* 899USD vs 999USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Reasons to choose Wharfedale Denton 85 over Q Acoustics 5020

Max Input Power 120 watts vs 100 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Minimum Impedance 3.8 ohms vs 3.3 ohms Very low impedance levels puts more pressure on amplifier
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 45 Hz vs 53 Hz Generates deeper bass
Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections

Q Acoustics 5020 vs Wharfedale Denton 85 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Q Acoustics 5020 Wharfedale Denton 85
Brand Q Acoustics Wharfedale
Speaker Type Bookshelf speakers Bookshelf speakers
Power Range 25-100 watts 20-120 watts
Sensitivity 87.9 dB 88 dB
Impedance 6 ohms 4 ohms
Impedance 3.3 ohms 3.8 ohms
Frequency Response 53-30k Hz 45-20k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 1 1
Woofer Size 5" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Continuous Curved Cone Woven Kevlar
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Soft-dome Soft-Dome
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No No
Crossover Frequency 2500 Hz 3100Hz
Firing Direction rear rear
Physical Specs
Height 286.0mm (11.3") 342.0mm (13.5")
Width 181.0mm (7.1") 240.0mm (9.4")
Depth 293.0mm (11.5") 304.0mm (12")
Weight 7.00kg (15.4lbs) 9.00kg (19.8lbs)
Enclosure Bass Relfex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF MDF/Wood Veneer
Available Colors Holme Oak,Satin Black,Satin White,Santos Rosewood Walnut, Mahogany, Black
Mounting Bracket No No
Recommended Stand Height n/a 24-28"
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 years 5 Years
Labor Warranty 5 years 5 Years

Verdict

A generation apart: Q Acoustics 5020 is the newer design, against a 2018 model. Newer is not automatically better, but the older one is more likely to be discounted or near run-out.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBWharfedale Denton 85 digs deeper - 45Hz against 53Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
Amplifier needsevenly matchedSimilar sensitivity (88dB vs 88dB) - both want much the same power.
Amplifier matchAQ Acoustics 5020 is the easier load at 6 ohms; the other is 4 ohms and wants an amplifier rated for it.
Headroomevenly matchedSimilar power handling (100W vs 120W).
SizedependsQ Acoustics 5020 is easier to place; Wharfedale Denton 85 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilityBWharfedale Denton 85: bi-amping.
PriceAQ Acoustics 5020 is cheaper - $899 against $999, about 10% less.

A Q Acoustics 5020  B Wharfedale Denton 85
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

The usual trade-off: Wharfedale Denton 85 measures better, Q Acoustics 5020 costs about about 11% more% less. Whether that gap is worth the money is the call only you can make - and in a normal room it is often smaller than the numbers suggest. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 53Hz anyway, which makes the cheaper Q Acoustics 5020 much easier to justify. Match it to your room: we rate Q Acoustics 5020 the better fit for near-field listening and a small room, and Wharfedale Denton 85 for a mid-size room and a large room.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction