SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers Anthem ARCAM Denon Integra JBL Marantz McIntosh NAD Onkyo Sony Yamaha
      Headphone Amps
      All Headphone Amplifiers Cambridge Audio iFi Audio McIntosh Naim Pro-Ject Rotel Schiit Audio Sennheiser Yamaha
      Multi-Zone
      All Multi-Zone Amplifiers JBL McIntosh OSD Rotel Russound Sonos
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Cayin Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL Layer Audio Design LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SOUNDBARS
    • Soundbars
      Soundbars Home All Soundbars (filter + sort) Size Simulator
      By TV Size
      43-50 inch TVs 55 inch TVs 65 inch and larger
      By Feature
      Dolby Atmos height channels Subwoofer included Can add rear speakers Compact (30 in or narrower) Under $500
      By Brand
      Bluesound Bose Denon Devialet Dual Furrion Harman Kardon JBL KEF Klipsch Marshall Polk Audio Samsung Sennheiser Sonos Sony WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Passive Floor-standing Speakers
  3. Q Acoustics 5040 vs KLH Kendall

Q Acoustics 5040 vs KLH Kendall Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Q Acoustics 5040

Passive Floor-standing | 39-30k Hz

Q Acoustics 5040
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
KLH Kendall

Passive Floor-standing | 25-23k Hz

KLH Kendall
Check price atAmazon›
Q Acoustics 5040 Q Acoustics 5040
Check price atAmazon›
KLH Kendall KLH Kendall
Check price atAmazon›
Q Acoustics 5040
See at AMAZON
KLH Kendall
See at AMAZON

Q Acoustics 5040 vs KLH Kendall Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing 5040 and Kendall, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from Q Acoustics and KLH.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Q Acoustics 5040 and KLH Kendall first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsQ Acoustics 5040KLH Kendall
BrandQ Acoustics
United Kingdom · founded 2006
KLH
United States · founded 1957
Design2-way3-way
Tweeter1" Soft-dome1"
Midrange—5.25"
Woofer2 x 5" Continuous Curved Cone2 x 6.5" Woven Kevlar
Frequency response39-30k Hz25-23k Hz
Sensitivity91.5 dB96 dB
Impedance6 ohms8 ohms
Power range25-150 wattsup to 250 watts
Weight18.05kg / 39.7lbs22.14kg / 48.7lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)38-1/8" x 14-1/4" x 11-1/2"
969.0 x 362.0 x 293.0mm
40-3/16" x 8-5/16" x 14-15/16"
1021.0 x 212.0 x 380.0mm

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that 5040 is a 2-way design whereas the Kendall is a 3-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Tweeter - 1 inchWoofer - 5 inchWoofer - 5 inch
Q Acoustics 5040
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 5.25 inchWoofer - 6.5 inchWoofer - 6.5 inch
KLH Kendall

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Q Acoustics 5040 KLH Kendall
Driver Setup 2-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - 1 x 5.25-inch
Woofer 2 x 5-inch 2 x 6.5-inch

5040 features a 1" Soft-dome Tweeter and 2 x 5" Continuous Curved Cone Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 2500 Hz. On the other hand, the Kendall features a 1" anodized aluminum Tweeter, a 5.25" Midrange and 2 x 6.5" Woven Kevlar Woofer.

Frequency Response

5040 has a frequency range of 39-30k Hz whereas Kendall has a frequency range of 25-23k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 25Hz, the Kendall can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the 5040's min frequency of 39Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

5040
Kendall
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

5040 is a 6 ohms speaker compared to the Kendall which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. 5040 sensitivity is rated at 91.5 dB and the Kendall's is rated at 96 dB. This 4 dB difference makes the KLH Kendall a more sensitive speaker compared to Q Acoustics 5040, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

5040
Kendall
Min
Average
Median

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. Staying within that range gives nominal performance; driving the speaker beyond its maximum wattage can damage it.

Kendall can handle a max power of 250 watts RMS, whereas 5040 has a max power handling value of 150 watts RMS, 100 watts less than the Kendall.

Note that higher power handling does not make a speaker louder: that depends mainly on sensitivity and impedance. The calculator below shows how loud each of these actually plays on a real amplifier.

Which plays louder on your amplifier?

Starting with a popular amplifier - change it to the one you own, or any you are considering, and watch both numbers move.

Q Acoustics 5040
 
KLH Kendall
 

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Kendall features Binding post posts which make bi-amping or bi-wiring possible. 5040 has a Binding post which doesn't feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Q Acoustics 5040 Terminals
Q Acoustics 5040's Binding post terminals

KLH KendallBinding post Terminals
KLH Kendall's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Q Acoustics 5040's and KLH Kendall's external dimensions. Q Acoustics 5040 has external dimensions of 969.0 x 362.0 x 293.0mm (38-1/8inch x 14-1/4inch x 11-1/2inch) whereas KLH Kendall has external dimensions of 1021.0 x 212.0 x 380.0mm (40-3/16 x 8-5/16 x 14-15/16inch).

Q Acoustics 5040 is 52mm shorter and 87mm less deeper than KLH Kendall but it is also 150mm wider.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Q Acoustics 5040 and KLH Kendall in scale.

Q Acoustics 5040 vs KLH Kendall Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Q Acoustics 5040 and KLH Kendall Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Q Acoustics 5040 is approximately 1060.7cm2 / 164.4inch2 and base area of the KLH Kendall is approximately 805.6cm2 / 124.9inch2. The 5040 requires 32% more surface area than the Kendall which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Q Acoustics 5040 weighs 18.05kg / 39.7lbs and the KLH Kendall weighs 22.14kg / 48.7lbs. This makes the Kendall 23% heavier than the 5040.

Here is a comparison of how 5040 and Kendall's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
Q Acoustics 5040
KLH Kendall
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Q Acoustics 5040?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of 5040:
  • 1x 5040 loudspeaker
  • 1x Owners manual
  • 2x Foam bung
  • 4x Spike feet
  • 4x Spike cover
  • 4x M5 screw
  • 2x Rear stabiliser

What's in the Box of KLH Kendall?

Here are the items that come with the Kendall:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • Foam port
  • 4 Rubber feet
  • 4 Spike feet (with nuts)
  • 4 Protective discs
  • Manual


Reasons to choose Q Acoustics 5040 over KLH Kendall

High Frequency Response 30k Hz vs 23k Hz Generates higher frequency
Height 969mm vs 1021mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Price per pair* 1498USD vs 1500USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Reasons to choose KLH Kendall over Q Acoustics 5040

Max Input Power 250 watts vs 150 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
Sensitivity 96 dB vs 92 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 6 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
Woofer Size 6.5 inches vs 5 inches Larger woofer
Low Frequency Response 25 Hz vs 39 Hz Generates deeper bass
Bi-Amping and Bi-Wiring Yes vs No Allows bi-amping and bi-wiring connections
Base Surface Area 805cm2 vs 1060cm2 Takes less floor space

Q Acoustics 5040 vs KLH Kendall Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Q Acoustics 5040 KLH Kendall
Brand Q Acoustics KLH
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
Power Range 25-150 watts up to 250 watts
Sensitivity 91.5 dB 96 dB
Impedance 6 ohms 8 ohms
Impedance 3.0 ohms n/a
Frequency Response 39-30k Hz 25-23k Hz
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 2
Woofer Size 5" 6.5"
Woofer Composition Continuous Curved Cone Woven Kevlar
Woofer Surround Material Rubber Butyl Rubber
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Soft-dome n/a
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver No 5.25"
Crossover Frequency 2500 Hz n/a
Firing Direction rear n/a
Physical Specs
Height 969.0mm (38.1") 1021.0mm (40.2")
Width 362.0mm (14.3") 212.0mm (8.3")
Depth 293.0mm (11.5") 380.0mm (15")
Weight 18.05kg (39.7lbs) 22.14kg (48.7lbs)
Enclosure Bass Relfex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF MDF/Wood Veneer
Available Colors Holme Oak,Satin Black,Satin White,Santos Rosewood Black
Grille Yes Yes
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs No Yes
Other
Parts Warranty 5 years 10 Years
Labor Warranty 5 years 10 Years

Verdict

A generation apart: Q Acoustics 5040 is the newer design, against a 2019 model. Newer is not automatically better, but the older one is more likely to be discounted or near run-out.

AreaBetterWhy
BassBKLH Kendall digs deeper - 25Hz against 39Hz.
Amplifier needsBKLH Kendall is more sensitive (96dB vs 92dB), so it goes louder on the same amplifier.
Amplifier matchBKLH Kendall is the easier load at 8 ohms.
HeadroomBKLH Kendall takes more power (250W vs 150W) - more in hand in a big room.
SizedependsSimilar cabinet size - neither is easier to fit.
ExpandabilitydependsKLH Kendall: bi-amping. Q Acoustics 5040 sits in a wider range (5 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
Priceevenly matchedMuch the same money ($1,498 vs $1,500 a pair).

A Q Acoustics 5040  B KLH Kendall
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

KLH Kendall has the edge on paper, though the margin is not large. The rows marked "depends" may matter more to you than the score does. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 39Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. If your amplifier is modest, vintage or valve-based, KLH Kendall is the safer partner - the other will want more current or more watts to sound its best.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction