One is a streaming all-in-one and the other is an amplifier. Judge them on how many boxes you want and what you already own, not on the spec sheet alone.
| Area | Better | Why |
|---|
| Power | B | Marantz Model 30 has more power - 100W against 60W into 8 ohms. That is about 2.2dB, so it plays usefully louder before it runs out and has more in hand on peaks. |
| Room size | depends | We rate Marantz Model 60n the better fit for desk or near-field listening and a small room, and Marantz Model 30 for a mid-size room, a large room and a very large room. Match the amplifier to the room you actually have, not the one you want. |
| Grip on hard loads | B | Marantz Model 30 holds up better into a 4-ohm load: its output nearly doubles to 200W, where the other increases modestly. That matters with demanding speakers far more than the 8-ohm figure does. |
| Bass control | B | Marantz Model 30 has the higher damping factor (500 vs 100), which usually means a tighter grip on a woofer. Above about 100 the returns flatten out, so read this as a tendency rather than a ranking. |
| Noise floor | A | Marantz Model 60n is the quieter design on paper - 113dB against 88dB. Audible mainly with sensitive speakers in a quiet room. |
| Built-in DAC | A | Marantz Model 60n has a DAC on board; the other needs an external one, which is another box, another power lead and another purchase. |
| Streaming | A | Only Marantz Model 60n has AirPlay 2, Roon and HEOS. |
| Analogue inputs | B | Marantz Model 30 takes more analogue sources - 6 against 3. |
| Room to grow | evenly matched | The same expansion options on both. |
| Amplifier class | depends | Marantz Model 60n is Class A/B and Marantz Model 30 is Class D. Class A/B runs warm and is the long-established mainstream choice; Class D runs cool and draws almost nothing at idle. Modern examples of both measure well - judge by the rest of the page. |
| Price | A | Marantz Model 60n costs less - $1,600 against $2,999 at list. |
A Marantz Model 60n B Marantz Model 30
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both amplifiers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.
Which should you choose?
Marantz Model 30 is ahead, but on only 1 of the measured areas, and it costs about 87% more. That is a lot of money for a narrow margin - Marantz Model 60n is the sensible buy unless a specific feature above decides it for you. If your speakers are a difficult load - 4 ohms nominal, big woofers, or a sensitivity in the low 80s - Marantz Model 30 is the safer partner, because how an amplifier behaves when the impedance drops matters more than its 8-ohm rating. Start with the room. In a large or open-plan room, or with speakers that are hard to drive - low sensitivity, or an impedance that dips - Marantz Model 30 has the headroom, and headroom is what stops an amplifier hardening up on peaks. At desk distance or in a small room, 60 watts is already more than most people ever use, and the extra 40 watts would be headroom you pay for and never hear - we rate Marantz Model 30 poorly for near-field use for exactly that reason.
What a spec sheet cannot show: how either sounds with your speakers, how the controls feel day to day, and what the app is like to live with - which is where most all-in-one amplifiers are actually won or lost. Power figures are the manufacturers' own and are not measured to a common standard, so treat small differences as noise. If you can hear both, that will tell you more than any row above.