In this review, we will be comparing R2 Meta and RC-64 III, two Passive Center Channel speakers from KEF and Klipsch. Let's have a brief look at the main features
of KEF R2 Meta and Klipsch RC-64 III first before getting into our more
detailed comparison.
What size room are the KEF R2 Meta and Klipsch RC-64 III speakers good for?
The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:
In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the KEF R2 Meta and Klipsch RC-64 III compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.
**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking
through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Drivers
One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that R2 Meta is a 3-way design whereas the RC-64 III is a 2-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.
Driver |
KEF R2 Meta |
Klipsch RC-64 III |
Driver Setup
|
3-way
|
2-way
|
Tweeter
|
1-inch
|
1-3/4-inch
|
Midrange
|
1 x 5-inch |
- |
Woofer
|
2 x 5.25-inch
|
4 x 6.5-inch
|
R2 Meta features a 1" Aluminum with MAT absorber Hard-Dome Tweeter , a 5" Midrange and 2 x 5.25" Hybrid Aluminum Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 560Hz and 2500Hz. On the other hand, the RC-64 III features a 1-3/4" titanium Tractrix horn Tweeter and 4 x 6.5" Cerametallic cone Woofer .
Frequency Response
R2 Meta has a frequency range of 67-28k Hz whereas RC-64 III has a frequency range of 57-24k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 57Hz, the RC-64 III can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R2 Meta's min frequency of 67Hz.
Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Center Channel class in our database.
Low Frequency
Center Channel Speakers
High Frequency
Center Channel Speakers
None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.
Impedance and Sensitivity
R2 Meta is a 4 ohms speaker compared to the RC-64 III which has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the R2 Meta can provide this impedance level.
These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. R2 Meta sensitivity is rated at 87 dB and the RC-64 III's is rated at 99 dB. This 12 dB difference makes the Klipsch RC-64 III a more sensitive speaker compared to KEF R2 Meta, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.
Sensitivity
Center Channel Speakers
Power Range
Power
range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.
Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker
compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters
such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.
Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring
Both R2 Meta and RC-64 III features dual binding post speaker terminals for bi-amping or bi-wiring.
Physical Specs
Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare KEF R2 Meta's and Klipsch RC-64 III's external dimensions. KEF R2 Meta has external dimensions of 177.0 x 553.0 x 312.0mm ( 6-15/16-inch x 21-3/4-inch x 12-1/4-inch) whereas Klipsch RC-64 III has external dimensions of 204.0 x 909.0 x 388.0mm ( 8 x 35-3/4 x 15-1/4inch) .
Klipsch RC-64 III is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 356mm wider, 27mm taller and 76mm deeper than KEF R2 Meta.
Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited.
The base surface area of the KEF R2 Meta is approximately 1725.4cm2 / 267.4inch2 and base area of the Klipsch RC-64 III is approximately 3526.9cm2 / 546.7inch2. The R2 Meta requires 51% less surface area than the RC-64 III which gives it a small advantage on placement in tight spaces.
Weight Comparison The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The KEF R2 Meta weighs 15.45kg / 34lbs and the Klipsch RC-64 III weighs 25.00kg / 55lbs. This makes the RC-64 III 62% heavier than the R2 Meta.
Here is a comparison of how R2 Meta and RC-64 III's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Center Channel class.
Weight
All Center Channel Speakers
What's in the Box of KEF R2 Meta?
Here are the items that are included inside the box of R2 Meta:
1 R2 Meta 1 microfiber grille Rubber feet User manual and warranty information
What's in the Box of Klipsch RC-64 III?
Here are the items that come with the RC-64 III:
Center channel loudspeakerGrille6 Self-adhesive rubber feet2 Jumpers (pre-installed)Owners Manual
Driver Setup |
3-way
vs
2-way
|
Have a dedicated mid-range driver |
High Frequency Response |
28k Hz
vs
24k Hz
|
Generates higher frequency |
Height |
177mm
vs
204mm
|
Easier to fit in smaller spaces |
Base Surface Area |
1725cm2 (553x312mm)
vs
3526cm2 (909x388mm)
|
Takes less floor space |
Price per pair* |
1399USD
vs
1829USD
|
costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time) |
Sensitivity |
99 dB
vs
87 dB
|
Play louder with same amount of amplification power |
Nominal Impedance |
8 ohms
vs
4 ohms
|
Less selective with amplifiers |
Woofer Size |
6.5 inches
vs
5.25 inches
|
Larger woofer |
Number of Woofers |
4
vs
2
|
More woofers |
Low Frequency Response |
57 Hz
vs
67 Hz
|
Generates deeper bass |
General |
KEF R2 Meta |
Klipsch RC-64 III |
Brand |
KEF |
Klipsch |
Speaker Type |
Center channel speaker |
Center channel speaker |
Power Range |
15-200 watts |
up to 200 watts |
Sensitivity |
87 dB |
99 dB |
Impedance |
4 ohms |
8 ohms |
Impedance |
3.2 ohms |
n/a |
Frequency Response |
67-28k Hz |
57-24k Hz |
Drivers |
|
|
Woofer Quantity |
2 |
4 |
Woofer Size |
5.25" |
6.5" |
Woofer Composition |
Hybrid Aluminum |
Cerametallic cone |
Woofer Surround Material |
Rubber |
n/a |
Tweeter Size |
1" |
1-3/4" |
Tweeter Type |
Hard-Dome |
Tractrix horn |
Aimable Tweeter |
No |
No |
Midrange Driver |
5" |
N/A" |
Crossover Frequency |
560Hz and 2500Hz |
n/a |
Physical Specs |
|
|
Height |
177.0mm (7") |
204.0mm (8") |
Width |
553.0mm (21.8") |
909.0mm (35.8") |
Depth |
312.0mm (12.3") |
388.0mm (15.3") |
Weight |
15.45kg (34lbs) |
25.00kg (55lbs) |
Enclosure |
Sealed |
Passive Radiator |
Finish |
n/a |
furniture grade veneer |
Available Colors |
Black Gloss, White Gloss, Walnut |
Walnut |
Grille |
n/a |
Yes |
Moisture Resistancy |
No |
No |
Connections |
|
|
Biamp Inputs |
Yes |
Yes |
Other |
|
|
Parts Warranty |
5 years |
5 Years |
Labor Warranty |
5 years |
5 Years |