SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS
    • By Type
      Passive Bookshelf Speakers Passive Floor-standing Speakers Passive Center Channel Speakers Passive In-wall Speakers All Passive Speakers Powered Subwoofers Powered Stereo Speakers
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Front Firing Port Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Acoustic Energy Aperion ATC Audio-Technica Audioengine Bluesound Bowers Wilkins Buchardt Cambridge Audio Canton DALI Definitive Technology Dynaudio ELAC Emotiva Fluance Focal Fyne Audio Genelec GoldenEar Harbeth Jamo JBL Kanto KEF KLH Klipsch Leak Mackie Magnepan MartinLogan McIntosh Mission MoFi Monitor Audio Nuvo Onkyo OSD Paradigm Perlisten Polk Audio PS Audio PSB Q Acoustics REL Revel Russound Sennheiser Sonos Sonus faber Sony Spendor SVS Tannoy Technics Triangle Velodyne Victrola Wharfedale Wilson Audio Yamaha
  • AMPLIFIERS
    • By Type
      All Amplifiers Integrated Amplifiers Stereo Receivers Streaming Amplifiers Power Amplifiers Compact Amplifiers
      Home Theater
      All Home Theater Receivers AnthemARCAMDenonIntegraJBLMarantzMcIntoshNADOnkyoSonyYamaha
      By Power
      Up to 60 watts 61 to 90 watts 91 to 120 watts 121 to 180 watts Over 180 watts
      By Feature
      HDMI Input Room Correction Subwoofer Output Handheld Remote Roon Ready
      By Brand
      Accuphase Advance Paris Anthem Arcam Audio Research AudioControl Audioengine Audiolab Bluesound Bose Buchardt Cambridge Audio Denon Devialet ELAC Emotiva Eversolo FiiO Fosi Audio Hegel HiFi Rose Integra JBL LEAK Luxman Marantz Mark Levinson McIntosh Michi MISSION MOON Musical Fidelity NAD Naim Onkyo OSD Parasound Pass Labs Peachtree PrimaLuna Primare PS Audio Rega Rogue Audio Roksan Rotel Schiit Audio Sonos Sony SVS T+A TEAC Technics Vincent WiiM Yamaha
  • SMART FIND
  • TOOLS
  • BLOG
  1. Home
  2. Polk R700 vs ELAC Navis ARF-51

Polk R700 vs ELAC Navis ARF-51 Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Polk R700

Passive Floor-standing | 38-38k Hz

Polk Audio Reserve R700
Check price atAmazon›
Change
    
ELAC Navis ARF-51

Powered Floor-standing | 43-28k Hz

ELAC Navis ARF-51
Check price atAmazon›
Polk R700 Polk R700
Check price atAmazon›
ELAC Navis ARF-51 ELAC Navis ARF-51
Check price atAmazon›
Polk R700
See at AMAZON
ELAC Navis ARF-51
See at AMAZON

Polk R700 vs ELAC Navis ARF-51 Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing R700 and Navis ARF-51, two Floor-standing speakers from Polk Audio and ELAC. The main difference between these two speakers is that the ELAC Navis ARF-51 is a Powered speaker which means that it has a built-in amplifier inside the speaker body so you don't need an external power amp or an integrated amp whereas the Polk R700 is a Passive speaker so has to be matched with an amplifier to get any sound from it.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Polk R700 and ELAC Navis ARF-51 first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Key SpecsPolk R700ELAC Navis ARF-51
BrandPolk Audio
United States · founded 1972
ELAC
Germany · founded 1926
Design3-way3-way
Built-in amplifier—300-watt RMS
Tweeter1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator1" Soft-Dome
Midrange6.5"4"
Woofer2 x 8" Polypropylene5.25" Aluminum
Frequency response38-38k Hz43-28k Hz
Sensitivity88 dB—
Impedance8 ohms—
Power range50-300 watts—
Bluetooth—Optional
Weight35.90kg / 79lbs21.00kg / 46.2lbs
Dimensions (H x W x D)45" x 12.6" x 16.9"
1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3mm
42.125" x 9.6875" x 11.5625"
1070.0 x 247.0 x 294.0mm

The sections below take each area in turn: drivers, frequency response, physical size and what you get in the box.


Drivers

Both R700 and Navis ARF-51 are 3-way speakers.

Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 6.5 inchWoofer - 8 inchWoofer - 8 inch
Polk R700
Tweeter - 1 inchMidrange - 4 inchWoofer - 5.25 inch
ELAC Navis ARF-51

TweeterMidrangeWoofer

Front view, drawn to scale - cabinets and drivers share one scale, so sizes are directly comparable. Hover a driver for its size.

Driver Polk R700 ELAC Navis ARF-51
Driver Setup 3-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange 1 x 6.5-inch 1 x 4-inch
Woofer 2 x 8-inch 1 x 5.25-inch

R700 features a 1" Pinnacle Ring Radiator Tweeter, a 6.5" Midrange and 2 x 8" Polypropylene Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 350Hz and 2700Hz. On the other hand, the Navis ARF-51 features a 1" Fabric Soft-Dome Tweeter, a 4" Midrange and 1 x 5.25" Aluminum Woofer.

Frequency Response

R700 has a frequency range of 38-38k Hz whereas Navis ARF-51 has a frequency range of 43-28k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 38Hz, the R700 can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Navis ARF-51's min frequency of 43Hz.

The graph below depicts how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average Low Frequency values of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

R700
Navis ARF-51
Min
Average
Median

Neither pair reaches down to 20Hz, the usual definition of full-range, which is normal for speakers of this size. If you want the bottom octave for movies or bass-heavy music, add a subwoofer to whichever you choose. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Cabinet Type and Port Position

R700 has a bottom firing port whereas Navis ARF-51 has a rear firing ports. Polk R700's bottom-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to ELAC Navis ARF-51 with its rear-firing port.

Polk R700  Port
Polk R700 Port

Physical Specs

The size of a speaker can sometimes be an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Polk R700's and ELAC Navis ARF-51's external dimensions. Polk R700 has external dimensions of 1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3mm (45 x 12.6 x 16.9inch) whereas ELAC Navis ARF-51 has external dimensions of 1070.0 x 247.0 x 294.0mm (42.125 x 9.6875 x 11.5625inch).

Polk R700 is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 73.7mm wider, 73.8mm taller and 134.3mm deeper than ELAC Navis ARF-51.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Polk R700 and ELAC Navis ARF-51 in scale.

Polk R700 vs ELAC Navis ARF-51 Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Polk R700 and ELAC Navis ARF-51 Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Polk R700 is approximately 1373.6cm2 / 212.9inch2 and base area of the ELAC Navis ARF-51 is approximately 726.2cm2 / 112.6inch2. The R700 requires 89% more surface area than the Navis ARF-51 which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

What's in the Box of Polk R700?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of R700:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • 4 Outrigger feet (pre-installed)
  • 4 Rubber feet (pre-installed)
  • 4 Spike feet (pre-installed)
  • Grille
  • Hex-key
  • Owner's Manual
  • Online Registration

What's in the Box of ELAC Navis ARF-51?

Here are the items that come with the Navis ARF-51:
  • Powered floorstanding loudspeaker
  • 8-feet AC power cord
  • Base plate
  • 4 Spikes
  • 4 Isolation pucks
  • 4 Screws
  • Operating Instructions


Reasons to choose Polk Audio Reserve R700 over ELAC Navis ARF-51

Woofer Size 8 inches vs 5.25 inches Larger woofer
Number of Woofers 2 vs 1 More woofers
Low Frequency Response 38 Hz vs 43 Hz Generates deeper bass
Price per pair* 2198USD vs 3798USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

Reasons to choose ELAC Navis ARF-51 over Polk Audio Reserve R700

Speaker Type Powered vs Passive Built-in amplifier
Height 1070mm vs 1143mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
Base Surface Area 726cm2 vs 1373cm2 Takes less floor space
RCA Connection Yes vs No Connection via RCA input
XLR Connection Yes vs No Connection via XLR input

Polk R700 vs ELAC Navis ARF-51 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications
General Polk Audio Reserve R700 ELAC Navis ARF-51
Brand Polk Audio ELAC
Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Powered Stereo Speakers
Sensitivity 88 dB n/a
Impedance 8 ohms n/a
Impedance 3.6 ohms n/a
Frequency Response 38-38k Hz 43-28k Hz
Amplifier
Watts RMS (Continuous) n/a 300-watt RMS
Drivers
Woofer Quantity 2 1
Woofer Size 8" 5.25"
Woofer Composition Polypropylene Aluminum
Woofer Surround Material Rubber n/a
Tweeter Size 1" 1"
Tweeter Type Pinnacle Ring Radiator Soft-Dome
Aimable Tweeter No No
Midrange Driver 6.5" 4"
Crossover Frequency 350Hz and 2700Hz n/a
Firing Direction bottom rear
Physical Specs
Height 1143.8mm (45") 1070.0mm (42.1")
Width 320.7mm (12.6") 247.0mm (9.7")
Depth 428.3mm (16.9") 294.0mm (11.6")
Weight 35.90kg (79lbs) 21.00kg (46.2lbs)
Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
Finish MDF/Vinyl n/a
Available Colors Black, Walnut, White n/a
Grille Yes n/a
Moisture Resistancy No No
Connections
Biamp Inputs Yes n/a
Aux Inputs n/a XLR, RCA
USB Port n/a No
Phone Input n/a No
Subwoofer Output n/a No
Digital Input n/a No
HDMI Input n/a No
Headphone Jack n/a No
Ethernet Port n/a No
Other
Parts Warranty 5 Years 3 Years
Labor Warranty 5 Years 3 Years

Verdict

Different kinds of product: one is active with its amplifier built in, the other passive and needs one. Judge them on how you want to own the system, not just the specs.

AreaBetterWhy
BassAPolk R700 digs deeper - 38Hz against 43Hz. A subwoofer would even that out.
What you buydependsELAC Navis ARF-51 is a complete system - just add a source. Polk R700 also needs an amplifier: more money and another box, but you choose it.
ConnectionsdependsELAC Navis ARF-51 has Bluetooth built in. With Polk R700 that all comes from the amplifier you pair it with.
Upgrade pathdependsPolk R700 can be re-amped later and outlive several amplifiers; ELAC Navis ARF-51 ages as one unit.
SizedependsELAC Navis ARF-51 is easier to place; Polk R700 is bigger, which usually goes with fuller bass. Your room decides.
ExpandabilityAPolk R700: bi-amping. Polk R700 sits in a wider range (10 models), so a matched surround system is easier later.
PriceAPolk R700 is cheaper - $2,198 against $3,798, about 42% less; arguably a different class. Speakers only - an amplifier narrows that gap.

A Polk R700  B ELAC Navis ARF-51
depends neither is better in the abstract - it turns on your room, your system or how you will use them. Only specs published for both speakers are judged; anything missing on either side is left out rather than guessed.

Which should you choose?

ELAC Navis ARF-51 suits you if you want one box, ready to play, with nothing else to buy. Polk R700 suits you if you already have an amplifier, want to choose the electronics, or expect to upgrade in stages. Neither is the better speaker in the abstract. If a subwoofer is in your plans, the bass gap largely stops mattering - you would be crossing over above 43Hz anyway, so judge these on the other rows instead. In a large or open-plan room, Polk R700 has the cabinet volume to fill it more easily; in a small room, near a wall or at desk distance, ELAC Navis ARF-51 is the easier speaker to get right.

And remember what a spec sheet cannot show: how each looks in your room and whether the finish suits it, what dealer support and warranty are like where you live, and how they actually sound to you. If you can hear them first - ideally with your own music - that will tell you more than any number above.


Most Popular Speakers
Klipsch Reference R-51M
Klipsch R-51M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
Wharfedale Elysian 2
Wharfedale Elysian 2
3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
KEF Q150
KEF Q150
2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
B&W 606 S2
2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
Klipsch RP-500M
2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
Wharfedale EVO5.1
Wharfedale EVO5.1
2-way | 87 dB | 4 ohms
Wharfedale EVO4.1
Wharfedale EVO4.1
2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
This site contains affiliate links. We may be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through one of them. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2026 by SpeakerDecision
About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

Report a Correction