SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND

Klipsch RP-8000F II vs Sonus Lumina III Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Klipsch RP-8000F II

Passive Floor-standing | 32-25k Hz

Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-8000F II
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Sonus Lumina III

Passive Floor-standing | 40-24k Hz

Sonus Faber Lumina III
CHECK PRICE
Klipsch RP-8000F II Klipsch RP-8000F II
See at AMAZON
Sonus Lumina III Sonus Lumina III
See at AMAZON
Klipsch RP-8000F II
See at AMAZON
Sonus Lumina III
See at AMAZON
Klipsch RP-8000F II vs Sonus Lumina III Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing RP-8000F II and Lumina III, two Passive Floor-standing speakers from Klipsch and Sonus Faber.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch RP-8000F II and Sonus Lumina III first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Klipsch RP-8000F II Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • 1" Tractrix Horn Tweeter
  • 2 x 8" Cerametallic cone Woofer
  • 32-25k Hz Frequency Response
  • 98 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:up to 150watts
  • Weight:28.00kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 1097.0" x 10-7/8" x 17-9/16"( 1097.0 x 277.0 x 447.0mm )

Sonus Lumina III Key Specs

  • 3-way Design
  • 1.15" high definition DAD Tweeter
  • 6" Midrange
  • 2 x 6" paper cone Woofer
  • 6" Midrange
  • 40-24k Hz Frequency Response
  • 89 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 4ohms
  • Power Range:50-250watts
  • Weight:15.90kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 989.0" x 9" x 10.9"( 989.0 x 228.0 x 278.0mm )

What size room are the Klipsch RP-8000F II and Sonus Lumina III speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Klipsch RP-8000F II Sonus Lumina III
Near-field Bad Bad
Small Room Poor Poor
Mid-size Room Good Average
Large Room Good Good
Very Large Room Poor Average

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the Klipsch RP-8000F II and Sonus Lumina III compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

One of the fundamental differences between these two speakers is that RP-8000F II is a 2-way design whereas the Lumina III is a 3-way speaker. 3-way designs utilize a midrange driver in addition to the tweeter and woofer on 2-way designs. Designing a crossover for a 3-way speaker is a complicated process and generally increases the overall cost of the speaker.

Driver Klipsch RP-8000F II Sonus Lumina III
Driver Setup 2-way 3-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1.15-inch
Midrange - 1 x 6-inch
Woofer 2 x 8-inch 2 x 6-inch

RP-8000F II features a 1" titanium Tractrix Horn Tweeter and 2 x 8" Cerametallic cone Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 1630 Hz. On the other hand, the Lumina III features a 1.15" high definition DAD Tweeter , a 6" Midrange and 2 x 6" paper cone Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 350 and 3500 Hz.

Frequency Response

RP-8000F II has a frequency range of 32-25k Hz whereas Lumina III has a frequency range of 40-24k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 32Hz, the RP-8000F II can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the Lumina III's min frequency of 40Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Floor-standing class in our database.

Low Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

RP-8000F II
Lumina III
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Floor-standing Speakers

Klipsch RP-8000F II
Sonus Lumina III
Min
Average
Max

None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

RP-8000F II is a 8 ohms speaker compared to the Lumina III which has a nominal impedance of 4 ohms. Lower impedance speakers, especially the ones that are rated at 4 ohms may put more pressure on the amplifier unit especially when played at high volume levels, so make sure the amp you pair with the Lumina III can provide this impedance level.

These two speakers also have different sensitivity levels. RP-8000F II sensitivity is rated at 98 dB and the Lumina III's is rated at 89 dB. This 9 dB difference makes the Klipsch RP-8000F II a more sensitive speaker compared to Sonus Lumina III, hence will play louder with the same amount of watts.

Sensitivity

Floor-standing Speakers

RP-8000F II
Lumina III
Min
Average
Max

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.

RP-8000F II can handle a max power of 250 watts RMS from the amp the whereas RP-8000F II has a max power handling value of 150 watts RMS , 100 watts less than the Lumina III.

Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

Both RP-8000F II and Lumina III features dual binding post speaker terminals for bi-amping or bi-wiring.

Klipsch RP-8000F II Terminals
Klipsch RP-8000F II's Binding post terminals allows Bi-amping or bi-wiring

Cabinet Type and Port Position

RP-8000F II has a rear firing port whereas Lumina III has a bottom firing ports. Sonus Lumina III's bottom-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to Klipsch RP-8000F II with its rear-firing port.

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch RP-8000F II's and Sonus Lumina III's external dimensions. Klipsch RP-8000F II has external dimensions of 1097.0 x 277.0 x 447.0mm ( 43-3/16 x 10-7/8 x 17-9/16inch) whereas Sonus Lumina III has external dimensions of 989.0 x 228.0 x 278.0mm ( 38.9 x 9 x 10.9inch) .

Klipsch RP-8000F II is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 49mm wider, 108mm taller and 169mm deeper than Sonus Lumina III.

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Klipsch RP-8000F II and Sonus Lumina III in scale.

Klipsch RP-8000F II vs Sonus Lumina III Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Klipsch RP-8000F II and Sonus Lumina III Size and External Dimensions

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Klipsch RP-8000F II is approximately 1238.2cm2 / 191.9inch2 and base area of the Sonus Lumina III is approximately 633.8cm2 / 98.2inch2. The RP-8000F II requires 95% more surface area than the Lumina III which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Klipsch RP-8000F II weighs 28.00kg / 61.6lbs and the Sonus Lumina III weighs 15.90kg / 35lbs. This makes the RP-8000F II 76% heavier than the Lumina III.

Here is a comparison of how RP-8000F II and Lumina III's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Floor-standing class.

Weight
All Floor-standing Speakers
Klipsch RP-8000F II
Sonus Lumina III
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Klipsch RP-8000F II?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of RP-8000F II:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • Stabilizer feet (pre-installed)
  • Grille
  • 2 Terminal jumpers (pre-installed)
  • Rubber cap (pre-installed)
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information
  • What's in the Box of Sonus Lumina III?

    Here are the items that come with the Lumina III:
  • Floorstanding loudspeaker
  • 1 Manual
  • 2 Jumpers
  • 2 Grilles
  • 2 Fabric dust guards
  • 4 Spikes
  • 4 Under spikes
  • 4 Spikes locks

  • Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-8000F II over Sonus Faber Lumina III
    Sensitivity 98 dB vs 89 dB Play louder with same amount of amplification power
    Nominal Impedance 8 ohms vs 4 ohms Less selective with amplifiers
    Woofer Size 8 inches vs 6 inches Larger woofer
    Low Frequency Response 32 Hz vs 40 Hz Generates deeper bass
    High Frequency Response 25k Hz vs 24k Hz Generates higher frequency
    Dolby Atmos Drivers Optional vs No Dolby Atmos Compatibility
    Price per pair* 1798USD vs 2199USD costs less (*prices may change depending on the seller, location and time)

    Reasons to choose Sonus Faber Lumina III over Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-8000F II

    Max Input Power 250 watts vs 150 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
    Driver Setup 3-way vs 2-way Have a dedicated mid-range driver
    Height 989mm vs 1097mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 633cm2 vs 1238cm2 Takes less floor space
    Klipsch RP-8000F II vs Sonus Lumina III Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-8000F II Sonus Faber Lumina III
    Brand Klipsch Sonus Faber
    Speaker Type Floor-standing speaker Floor-standing speaker
    Power Range up to 150 watts 50-250 watts
    Sensitivity 98 dB 89 dB
    Impedance 8 ohms 4 ohms
    Frequency Response 32-25k Hz 40-24k Hz
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 2 2
    Woofer Size 8" 6"
    Woofer Composition Cerametallic cone paper cone
    Woofer Surround Material Rubber n/a
    Tweeter Size 1" 1.15"
    Tweeter Type Tractrix Horn high definition DAD
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No 6"
    Crossover Frequency 1630 Hz 350 and 3500 Hz
    Firing Direction rear bottom
    Physical Specs
    Height 1097.0mm (43.2") 989.0mm (38.9")
    Width 277.0mm (10.9") 228.0mm (9")
    Depth 447.0mm (17.6") 278.0mm (10.9")
    Weight 28.00kg (61.6lbs) 15.90kg (35lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
    Finish MDF/Wood-grain vinyl real multilayer wood
    Available Colors Walnut, Black Black, Wenge, Walnut
    Grille Yes Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Biamp Inputs Yes Yes
    Other
    Parts Warranty 5 Years
    Labor Warranty 5 Years

    Most Popular Speakers
    Klipsch Reference R-51M
    Klipsch R-51M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
    B&W 606 S2
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    KEF Q150
    KEF Q150
    2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
    Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
    Klipsch RP-500M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606
    B&W 606
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction