SpeakerDecision
  • SPEAKERS by TYPE
    • Passive Bookshelf Speakers
    • Passive Floor-standing Speakers
    • Passive Center Channel Speakers
    • Passive In-wall Speakers
    • All Passive Speakers
    • Powered Subwoofers
    • Powered Stereo Speakers
  • AMPLIFIERS
  • SMART FIND

Klipsch RP-504C II vs Klipsch R-34C Comparison

x
Speaker to replace
Change

Klipsch RP-504C II

Passive Center Channel | 50-25k Hz

Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-504C II
CHECK PRICE
Change
    
Klipsch R-34C

Passive Center Channel | 82-21k Hz

Klipsch Reference R-34C
CHECK PRICE
Klipsch RP-504C II Klipsch RP-504C II
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-34C Klipsch R-34C
See at AMAZON
Klipsch RP-504C II
See at AMAZON
Klipsch R-34C
See at AMAZON
Klipsch RP-504C II vs Klipsch R-34C Speaker Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing RP-504C II and R-34C, two Passive Center Channel speakers by Klipsch

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Klipsch RP-504C II and Klipsch R-34C first before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Klipsch RP-504C II Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • 1" Tractrix Horn Tweeter
  • 4 x 5.25" Cerametallic cone Woofer
  • 50-25k Hz Frequency Response
  • 96 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:up to 150watts
  • Weight:16.50kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 177.0" x 32-3/16" x 15-1/8"( 177.0 x 818.0 x 385.0mm )

Klipsch R-34C Key Specs

  • 2-way Design
  • 1" Tractrix horn Tweeter
  • 4 x 3.5" copper spun IMG Woofer
  • 82-21k Hz Frequency Response
  • 96 dB Sensitivity
  • Impedance: 8ohms
  • Power Range:up to 100watts
  • Weight:5.91kg
  • Dimensions (H x W x D): 126.0" x 26-1/16" x 6-1/4"( 126.0 x 662.0 x 159.0mm )

What size room are the Klipsch RP-504C II and Klipsch R-34C speakers good for?

The size of the room in which you are planning to use these loudspeakers is an important decision factor. Here we have compared their suitability to various sizes of environments considering their size and max power parameters:

Listening Environment* Klipsch RP-504C II Klipsch R-34C
Near-field Poor Average
Small Room Average Good
Mid-size Room Good Average
Large Room Average Poor
Very Large Room Poor Bad

(* Approximate Room sizes: Small < 100sq. ft / 9 m2, Mid-size: 100-220 sq. ft / 9-20 m2, Large 220-400 sq. ft / 20-36 m2, Very Large: > 400 sq. ft / 36 m2. Average Floor Height: 9" / 2.7m. Typical room sizes differ from country to country, and the actual listening experience changes depending on floor height, room shape, surface materials, listening position, speaker locations, etc.)

In the following sections, we will get into more detail in order to better understand how the Klipsch RP-504C II and Klipsch R-34C compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one of these loudspeakers is the better choice for you.


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


Drivers

Both RP-504C II and R-34C are 2-way speakers.

Driver Klipsch RP-504C II Klipsch R-34C
Driver Setup 2-way 2-way
Tweeter 1-inch 1-inch
Midrange - -
Woofer 4 x 5.25-inch 4 x 3.5-inch

RP-504C II features a 1" titanium Tractrix Horn Tweeter and 4 x 5.25" Cerametallic cone Woofer with a Crossover frequency at 1950 Hz. On the other hand, the R-34C features a 1" aluminum Tractrix horn Tweeter and 4 x 3.5" copper spun IMG Woofer .

Frequency Response

RP-504C II has a frequency range of 50-25k Hz whereas R-34C has a frequency range of 82-21k Hz. With a minimum frequency of 50Hz, the RP-504C II can go significantly deeper on the low side and provide stronger bass compared to the R-34C's min frequency of 82Hz.

Below graphs depict how these two speakers compare with the max, min and average values of the Min and Max Frequencies of other speakers in the Center Channel class in our database.

Low Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

RP-504C II
R-34C
Min
Average
Max
High Frequency

Center Channel Speakers

Klipsch RP-504C II
Klipsch R-34C
Min
Average
Max

None of these speakers achieves full range experience which is commonly agreed as 20Hz-20kHz. In order to achieve lower lows / deeper bass, we recommend you pair these with a subwoofer. Visit our Powered Subwoofers section to find out more about the available options.

Impedance and Sensitivity

RP-504C II and R-34C have the same Impedance of 8 ohms and their sensitivity is also same at 96 dB.

Sensitivity

Center Channel Speakers

RP-504C II
R-34C
Min
Average
Max

Power Range

Power range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance , inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker.

RP-504C II can handle a max power of 150 watts RMS from the amp the whereas R-34C has a max power handling value of 100 watts RMS, 50 watts less than the RP-504C II.

Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speaker compared to a lower max handling speaker. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies.

Input Type and Bi-Amping / Bi-Wiring

RP-504C II features Binding post type posts and R-34C has a Binding post type posts. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.

Klipsch RP-504C II Terminals
Klipsch RP-504C II's Binding post terminals

Klipsch R-34CBinding post Terminals
Klipsch R-34C's Binding post terminals

Physical Specs

Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch RP-504C II's and Klipsch R-34C's external dimensions. Klipsch RP-504C II has external dimensions of 177.0 x 818.0 x 385.0mm ( 6-15/16 x 32-3/16 x 15-1/8inch) whereas Klipsch R-34C has external dimensions of 126.0 x 662.0 x 159.0mm ( 4-15/16 x 26-1/16 x 6-1/4inch) .

Klipsch RP-504C II is clearly the larger of the two speakers. Its body is 156mm wider, 51mm taller and 226mm deeper than Klipsch R-34C.

Base Surface Area Comparison
Base surface area of a loudspeaker may become a determining factor when the space in your room or desk is limited. The base surface area of the Klipsch RP-504C II is approximately 3149.3cm2 / 488.1inch2 and base area of the Klipsch R-34C is approximately 1052.6cm2 / 163.2inch2. The RP-504C II requires 199% more surface area than the R-34C which gives it a small disadvantage on placement in tight spaces.

Weight Comparison

The weight of a loudspeaker can become an important factor if you need to move and reposition the unit often. Weight of a speaker can also "sometimes" be an indicator of the rigidity of the enclosure and the quality of the internal components used. The Klipsch RP-504C II weighs 16.50kg / 36.3lbs and the Klipsch R-34C weighs 5.91kg / 13lbs. This makes the RP-504C II 179% heavier than the R-34C.

Here is a comparison of how RP-504C II and R-34C's weights compare with the average, max and min weights in Passive Center Channel class.

Weight
All Center Channel Speakers
Klipsch RP-504C II
Klipsch R-34C
Min
Average
Max

What's in the Box of Klipsch RP-504C II?

Here are the items that are included inside the box of RP-504C II:
  • Center channel loudspeaker
  • Grille
  • User Manual
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information
  • What's in the Box of Klipsch R-34C?

    Here are the items that come with the R-34C:
  • Center-channel loudspeaker
  • Grille (installed)
  • 8 Self-adhesive rubber feet
  • Quick Setup Guide
  • Important Safety Instructions
  • Warranty Information

  • Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-504C II over Klipsch Reference R-34C
    Max Input Power 150 watts vs 100 watts Handle more power from your amplifier
    Woofer Size 5.25 inches vs 3.5 inches Larger woofer
    Low Frequency Response 50 Hz vs 82 Hz Generates deeper bass
    High Frequency Response 25k Hz vs 21k Hz Generates higher frequency

    Reasons to choose Klipsch Reference R-34C over Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-504C II

    Height 126mm vs 177mm Easier to fit in smaller spaces
    Base Surface Area 1052cm2 vs 3149cm2 Takes less floor space
    Klipsch RP-504C II vs Klipsch R-34C Specs Table
    Detailed comparison of specifications
    General Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-504C II Klipsch Reference R-34C
    Brand Klipsch Klipsch
    Speaker Type Center channel speaker Center channel speaker
    Power Range up to 150 watts up to 100 watts
    Sensitivity 96 dB 96 dB
    Impedance 8 ohms 8 ohms
    Frequency Response 50-25k Hz 82-21k Hz
    Drivers
    Woofer Quantity 4 4
    Woofer Size 5.25" 3.5"
    Woofer Composition Cerametallic cone copper spun IMG
    Woofer Surround Material Rubber n/a
    Tweeter Size 1" 1"
    Tweeter Type Tractrix Horn Tractrix horn
    Aimable Tweeter No No
    Midrange Driver No N/A"
    Crossover Frequency 1950 Hz n/a
    Firing Direction rear n/a
    Physical Specs
    Height 177.0mm (7") 126.0mm (5")
    Width 818.0mm (32.2") 662.0mm (26.1")
    Depth 385.0mm (15.2") 159.0mm (6.3")
    Weight 16.50kg (36.3lbs) 5.91kg (13lbs)
    Enclosure Bass Reflex Bass Reflex
    Finish MDF/Wood-grain vinyl textured wood grain viny
    Available Colors Walnut, Black Black
    Grille Yes Yes
    Moisture Resistancy No No
    Connections
    Biamp Inputs No n/a
    Other
    Parts Warranty 5 Years 5 Years
    Labor Warranty 5 Years 5 Years

    Most Popular Speakers
    Klipsch Reference R-51M
    Klipsch R-51M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    Wharfedale Elysian 2
    3-way | 89 dB | 4 ohms
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
    2-way | 87 dB | 6 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 Anniversary Edition
    B&W 606 S2
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    KEF Q150
    KEF Q150
    2-way | 86 dB | 8 ohms
    Klipsch Reference Premiere RP-500M
    Klipsch RP-500M
    2-way | 93 dB | 8 ohms
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    Wharfedale EVO4.1
    2-way | 87 dB | 8 ohms
    Bowers & Wilkins 606
    B&W 606
    2-way | 88 dB | 8 ohms
    Copyright © 2025 by SpeakerDecision
    About Privacy Contact US Camera Decision

    Report a Correction